Tiger Al 0 Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 If he loses, Coleman still intent on seeking the help of "activist judges" Roberts, Alito, Thomas and Scalia on the Supreme Court. LINK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AFTiger 282 Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 If he loses, Coleman still intent on seeking the help of "activist judges" Roberts, Alito, Thomas and Scalia on the Supreme Court. LINK Coleman just wants to count all the votes. Surely you as a liberal can agree with that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
autigeremt 6,788 Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 Only if it fits his agenda, AF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CarolinaTiger 0 Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 I really think Franken is going to pull this thing off. It's amazing how close it is, and has remained throughout the contest. "312" sounds like a HUGE lead...but out of 3 million votes cast, it really is a drop in the bucket...about 1/10th of 1%. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SouthLink02 8 Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 Only if it fits his agenda, AF. Kind of like Coleman telling Franklin to just quit when Coleman was ahead early on? Then switching to the "Fight to the very end" when he was losing? Yes, people are doing what fits their agenda in this debate Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiger Al 0 Posted April 8, 2009 Author Share Posted April 8, 2009 Only if it fits his agenda, AF. Kind of like Coleman telling Franklin to just quit when Coleman was ahead early on? Then switching to the "Fight to the very end" when he was losing? Yes, people are doing what fits their agenda in this debate I think he meant MY agenda. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SouthLink02 8 Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 Only if it fits his agenda, AF. Kind of like Coleman telling Franklin to just quit when Coleman was ahead early on? Then switching to the "Fight to the very end" when he was losing? Yes, people are doing what fits their agenda in this debate I think he meant MY agenda. Ya but everyone has an agenda Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
au2004ece 30 Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 Al Franken's Lead Increases To 312 They must have found some more votes from dead people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiger Al 0 Posted April 8, 2009 Author Share Posted April 8, 2009 Al Franken's Lead Increases To 312 They must have found some more votes from dead people. Yes. If Franken wins it'll most certainly be because he cheated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
autigeremt 6,788 Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 If he wins, he wins. I think it needs to be over already. It's not going to change anything on Capitol Hill anyway. Like I have said before, Coleman should be ashamed that it has come to this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AURaptor 1,129 Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 If he loses, Coleman still intent on seeking the help of "activist judges" Roberts, Alito, Thomas and Scalia on the Supreme Court. LINK Not 1 damn thing wrong in holding up the law. It's when the bench MAKES UP laws , entirely out of thin air, like the Left wing judges do, that makes them "activist " judges. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AURaptor 1,129 Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 Yes. If Franken wins it'll most certainly be because he cheated. If not him, certainly the Democratic Party. No truer words were ever spoken by you, T.A. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justin5 20 Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 I wish I had been around these forums during the 2000 pres. I bet a lot of you were singing a different tune. I have no problem with Coleman exhausting EVERY possible outlet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
autigeremt 6,788 Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 I can't see Coleman winning this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiger Al 0 Posted April 8, 2009 Author Share Posted April 8, 2009 I wish I had been around these forums during the 2000 pres. I bet a lot of you were singing a different tune. I have no problem with Coleman exhausting EVERY possible outlet. Nor do I. I was being sarcastic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SouthLink02 8 Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 Not 1 damn thing wrong in holding up the law. It's when the bench MAKES UP laws , entirely out of thin air, like the Left wing judges do, that makes them "activist " judges. You don't know much Supreme Court history, do you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
au2004ece 30 Posted April 9, 2009 Share Posted April 9, 2009 I wish I had been around these forums during the 2000 pres. I bet a lot of you were singing a different tune. I have no problem with Coleman exhausting EVERY possible outlet. No, the democrats tried to steal that election also. Wasn't Coleman ahead in the initial count? Just like Bush? Now with a recount, where the rules are changed on how to count a ballot, the democrat pulls ahead (just like the democrats tried to do in 2000). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AFTiger 282 Posted April 9, 2009 Share Posted April 9, 2009 I wish I had been around these forums during the 2000 pres. I bet a lot of you were singing a different tune. I have no problem with Coleman exhausting EVERY possible outlet. No, the democrats tried to steal that election also. Wasn't Coleman ahead in the initial count? Just like Bush? Now with a recount, where the rules are changed on how to count a ballot, the democrat pulls ahead (just like the democrats tried to do in 2000). Only the originally rejected absentee ballots submited by Franken from heavily Democrat precincts are being added to the total. Coleman wants to examine all rejected absentee ballots from all counties. Seems fair enough. Remember, Frankin started this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinCrimson 61 Posted April 9, 2009 Share Posted April 9, 2009 Should the fact that it was close not tell you enough? Al Franken, a comedian, BEAT a sitting Republican U.S. Senator? Ouch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AFTiger 282 Posted April 9, 2009 Share Posted April 9, 2009 Should the fact that it was close not tell you enough? Al Franken, a comedian, BEAT a sitting Republican U.S. Senator? Ouch. And Barak Obama, a neighborhood activist, was elected President. This doesn't speak well of us as a nation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SouthLink02 8 Posted April 9, 2009 Share Posted April 9, 2009 This doesn't speak well of us as a nation. The fact that Bush was re-elected proved that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
autigeremt 6,788 Posted April 9, 2009 Share Posted April 9, 2009 This doesn't speak well of us as a nation. The fact that Bush was re-elected proved that Hey, the Democrats didn't help their cause by electing Kerry as his rival! Kerry was terrible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SouthLink02 8 Posted April 9, 2009 Share Posted April 9, 2009 This doesn't speak well of us as a nation. The fact that Bush was re-elected proved that Hey, the Democrats didn't help their cause by electing Kerry as his rival! Kerry was terrible. I don't disagree with that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.