Aubie7 0 Posted August 4, 2005 Share Posted August 4, 2005 Every article I have read about the RB's list them each at about 5-10 and around 200-208. Do we not have any big backs like Ronnie? Why can't/don't we recuriut big backs? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StatTiger 3,188 Posted August 4, 2005 Share Posted August 4, 2005 Two years ago, I researched the average size of the starting RB for each NFL team. It came out to 5-11 / 219, which is about the size of Carnell Williams. This is also about the average size of the backs, who have played for Tuberville at Ole Miss and Auburn. I believe they are beefing up Carl Stewart to fill the role of Ronnie Brown but he just won't be as fast. As long as we stay in the range of 205-220, I think we're just fine. I cannot see Tuberville ever signing RB's we were cursed with under Bowden. 2 cents Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.