LSUTigers1404 0 Posted May 5, 2006 Share Posted May 5, 2006 I apologize if this has already been posted. I just wanted to get your comments about USC maybe having to give up its 2004 National Championship. If that is the case do you think there is anyway the BCS or either of the polls awards the title to Auburn? Don't forget that Utah was also undefeated. Personally I think the 2004 Championship would just be vacated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aumoore 0 Posted May 5, 2006 Share Posted May 5, 2006 I apologize if this has already been posted. I just wanted to get your comments about USC maybe having to give up its 2004 National Championship. If that is the case do you think there is anyway the BCS or either of the polls awards the title to Auburn? Don't forget that Utah was also undefeated. Personally I think the 2004 Championship would just be vacated. 233972[/snapback] I will take it but I bet the NCAA finds a way to keep the condoms out of the hole the Crimson Tide dug. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SouthLink02 8 Posted May 5, 2006 Share Posted May 5, 2006 This will never happen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texan4Auburn 1,626 Posted May 5, 2006 Share Posted May 5, 2006 Personally I could care less about the 04 title now. It would be hilarious to see USC stripped of it though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarDlowe 39 Posted May 5, 2006 Share Posted May 5, 2006 i wouldn't feel right accepting it so i think it should just be vacated but i would LOVE to see USC stripped. either way i know who the best TEAM in america was in 2004, and it was my tigers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vatz22au 142 Posted May 5, 2006 Share Posted May 5, 2006 Accepting a title? We won the SEC (in convincing fashion with one of the hardest schedules in America, beating top ten team Tenn. (twice), top ten team Georgia, top ten team LSU, top ten team VTech) .... we won every game.... we won the Sugar bowl.... I already claim something that other teams cant claim that season. I could care less what happens to USC, just another media hyped team that plays a joke of a season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abrnfanatc 6 Posted May 5, 2006 Share Posted May 5, 2006 There's only 1 title that I want to see Auburn accepting at this point...the 2006 BCS title. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CircleDrill 178 Posted May 5, 2006 Share Posted May 5, 2006 Retro-active MNC's should be limited to the UAT "dynasty." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarTim 3,456 Posted May 5, 2006 Share Posted May 5, 2006 Retro-active MNC's should be limited to the UAT "dynasty." 234007[/snapback] BINGO! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Tigrinum Major Posted May 5, 2006 Share Posted May 5, 2006 If USC is forced to forfeit those games, Oklahoma should be awarded the crystal trophy. They were in the BCS game and therefore would be the winners if USC forfeits. I hope this scenario plays out rather than Auburn getting any benefit from the misdeeds of others. I am at peace with the decisions of 2004/early 2005. Besides, Oklahoma and Alabama share that "brotherhood" thing, so it would only be fitting for Oklahoma to be awarded a MNC in such a fashion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcgufcm 4,107 Posted May 5, 2006 Share Posted May 5, 2006 we were already the best team in the nation in 2004. no one beat us and no one would have. that's all i'll remember. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aubie16 1 Posted May 5, 2006 Share Posted May 5, 2006 we were already the best team in the nation in 2004. no one beat us and no one would have. that's all i'll remember. 234044[/snapback] No need for me to put in my 2 cents because its already been done... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WeagleDMS 0 Posted May 5, 2006 Share Posted May 5, 2006 If USC is forced to forfeit those games, Oklahoma should be awarded the crystal trophy. They were in the BCS game and therefore would be the winners if USC forfeits. I hope this scenario plays out rather than Auburn getting any benefit from the misdeeds of others. I am at peace with the decisions of 2004/early 2005. Besides, Oklahoma and Alabama share that "brotherhood" thing, so it would only be fitting for Oklahoma to be awarded a MNC in such a fashion. 234023[/snapback] That being said, screw the BCS. Have there been any reports from the AP folks concerning this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texan4Auburn 1,626 Posted May 5, 2006 Share Posted May 5, 2006 Tuberville skated the question on Finebaum, though he did say we would have beaten OU and the USC would have been a good game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnDeere 0 Posted May 9, 2006 Share Posted May 9, 2006 If USC is forced to forfeit those games, Oklahoma should be awarded the crystal trophy. They were in the BCS game and therefore would be the winners if USC forfeits. I hope this scenario plays out rather than Auburn getting any benefit from the misdeeds of others. I am at peace with the decisions of 2004/early 2005. Besides, Oklahoma and Alabama share that "brotherhood" thing, so it would only be fitting for Oklahoma to be awarded a MNC in such a fashion. 234023[/snapback] That would be fitting. Keith Jackson could retire a happy man. Having the OUs win the MNC instead of his beloved Terds would be the next best thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarTiger 3,910 Posted May 9, 2006 Share Posted May 9, 2006 IMO, if enough evidence is there to strip USC of the title, then the title should REMAIN vacant. I certainly don't want us to benefit from someone elses screwup. That we reserve for the "bammers". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.