Jump to content

PSUPat

Verified Member
  • Posts

    51
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

PSUPat last won the day on September 16 2021

PSUPat had the most liked content!

About PSUPat

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

PSUPat's Achievements

Contributor

Contributor (5/14)

  • First Post
  • Collaborator
  • Reacting Well
  • Very Popular Rare
  • Week One Done

Recent Badges

126

Reputation

  1. You're saying college football analysts over-react? Say it ain't so!!!!! Yes it's funny. Yes it happens every year. Among the 5-30 best teams in the country, there's a razor thin margin between them. And we're both in that group. PSU is capable of winning the B1G and going to the playoffs, or ending up 9th in the conference, and the difference between those two extremes is a few lucky bounces and an inch here and there. I think the same can be said of Auburn. You have a lot of solid teams on your schedule, just like us, and you're going to have a lot of close games, just like us. We happened to escape our first 2 of them with a win.
  2. I'm PSU through and through. Lived in PA all my life and a PSU alum. Just getting a chance to look at last weekends game in more detail. But yes, always admired Auburn.
  3. The dig on that is, that this play was copied from Bammer. https://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2014/11/9/7180957/alabama-trick-play-lsu-brandon-greene
  4. I don't know whether your secondary is any good or not. Is it: 1. You weren't generating a pass rush, so you had to sit in a soft zone to prevent the deep ball? (i.e. the weakness is DL). 2. You weren't generating a pass rush BECAUSE your coaches were afraid of getting burnt deep and therefore playing coverage instead of pressure. (weakness is secondary). Not sure, but a couple of notes. - Ya'll didn't run a single stunt on the DL the entire game I don't think. I found that strange. Not sure I've ever seen anyone just try to man up like that. It was gap sound and contained the run game, but you couldn't get pressure like that. - On 1 of the big TE plays, it was a tackle eligible type play. We split out the RT to look like a WR, and put the center between the LG and LT. Thus, the TE was only 2 players to the left of the center, looking like a LT but eligible, and your secondary didn't pick up on it and viewed him as an ineligible lineman. - The other big TE plays were actually on blitzes. One reason you didn't blitz much is because the few times you did turned into big plays for us. I believe the streaking TE is a hot route for PSU, but we're still learning our own offensive system. That would mean you didn't disguise it well and Clifford read blitz before the snap.
  5. fyi, I saw lots of comments about Auburns secondary losing the TE. The one real long pass to the TE was a tackle eligible play.
  6. I think we're a playoff "contender" in the sense that we're a solid but not spectacular team right now and the B1G has 6 or 8 teams at the same level as us. The difference between 1st and 9th in this conference is razor thin this year. Teams aren't static. Who improves the most from here? Who gets the ball to bounce their way? We're in that mix though.
  7. @Iowa, @MSU, @OSU, @Maryland even looks tough at 3-0 with a W over WVU. Michigan - still untested but look solid, at least we get them at home. Rutgers doesn't even look like a pushover.
  8. fyi, I see ya arguing. Ya'll are very well coached. You had 2 stud running backs, and our backs are pretty weak, honestly. PSU was more talented pretty much everywhere else, dominated the line of scrimmage, and was a constant threat to go ahead 2 scores and force you to pass, where we woulda broken it open. We couldn't do it. Secondary jumping routes and coming up inches away. Every time we score, there was a response by Auburn to stay in it. Very gritty effort. Yeah a couple of questionable play calls, but so did we. Your players were disciplined and played with heart. Really impressed. A good WR and a pass rushing DE would change your fortunes quickly.
  9. If this was at Auburn we'd switch the outcome. PSU d-line was first off the ball all night long with Auburn's tackles going on PSU's movement. Thats what home field does. Yours does too, I'm sure.
  10. Congrats to Auburn. We couldn't quite put it away, and you couldn't quite win it. Ended up a fantastic game that was about like the talking heads thought it'd be. Beat Bammer. Time to party.
  11. https://www.google.com/amp/s/nittanylionswire.usatoday.com/2021/09/18/our-barkley-is-better-and-other-college-gameday-signs-from-penn-state-auburn/amp/ A few good ones. Peace Auburn folks. Nice showing by you guys, good luck in every game but tonight!
  12. I agree, point was it was was a good bammer team. Hey, we had bad years in there too. Part of that 8-8 record is a few bad PSU teams still calling a whiteout against top teams. Most of the time we play in these, we're underdogs, and they turn into dogfights.
  13. So in perspective. 16 total white outs. - won 4/5 when favored (loss was in a monsoon) - won 4/11 as an underdog. - worst loss was to eventual BCS champ Alabama by 16. Who beat Auburn by 28. Florida by 28. And LSU by 21 in the natty game. - 7 of the opponents were in the top 10. Underdog in all 7 of these. Went 2-5 in those games. - 6 of the opponents were ranked 10-25. Favored in 3 of these. Went 4-2. - 3 opponents were unranked. PSU was a favorite in all 3. Went 2-1 with the loss being to Iowa in a monsoon. Based on this you'd think we're a 10-20 type program with occasional top 10 years or something.
  14. Added spreads to above. Penn St was the underdog in 11 out of 16 white outs.
  15. I dunno actually. Obviously pretty much all wore white jerseys. I doubt going all white has any strategic advantage. If anything a disadvantage if your qb loses recievers in the crowd. But I doubt that, the field is green, lol. From a motivational standpoint, I think its a cool move. Buy in and have fun with it.
×
×
  • Create New...