Our free republic?

[Bottomfeeder 244]

"A government that is best at destroying life, is not a free republic, but rather tyrannical in nature."

The Bill of Rights comprises the first ten amendments to the Constitution. Those amendments were adopted between 1789 and 1791, and all relate to limiting the power of the federal government. They were added in response to criticisms of the Constitution by the state ratification conventions and by prominent individuals such as Thomas Jefferson (who was not a delegate to the Constitutional Convention). These critics argued that without further restraints, the strong central government would become tyrannical.

We spend a lot of money on defense, but box cutters ruled our little world on 911. Now, that's money well spent wouldn't you say?

[WinCrimson 61]

I think it comes down to someone being asleep at the CIA, actually. That and the idiots who taught those fools how "fly but not to land." How stupid can you get?

[Bottomfeeder 244]

It falls to a uat level of ignorance and delusion that we not treat ISLAMO terrosit   to the level of real enemies to the u.s.

9/11 enmies.

244337[/snapback]

Looks like some of my typos.

[Tiger in Spain 0]

I think it comes down to someone being asleep at the CIA, actually.

244253[/snapback]

No, it comes down to political correctness depleting our intelligence agencies of their best agents. The agencies became more interested in promoting sensitivity training rather than hiring "potentially bad people" from Middle Eastern countries that could have helped us keep our ears open to the arab street.

That and the idiots who taught those fools how "fly but not to land." How stupid can you get? 

244253[/snapback]

Hindsight is a #@*$% isn't it?

Prior to 9/11, did you ever envision someone flying planes into buildings in order to attack the country?

[AURaptor 1,125]

It falls to a uat level of ignorance and delusion that we not treat ISLAMO terrosit   to the level of real enemies to the u.s.

9/11 enmies.

244337[/snapback]

Looks like some of my typos.

244396[/snapback]

Typos, yes. Had I made a more coherent remark than the one I 'attempted' , you'd still overlook the message and comment only on the typos, or some other irrelevent stuff. Point being, its Islamic terrorism that is the enemy here, and folks like you are overlooking the basic fact so you can bash Bush instead.

[Bottomfeeder 244]

You must have really meant "Islamo-fascist."

They were bribing Osama bin Ladin 300 million dollars a year to stay out of Saudi Arabia and go blow up someone else.

And we have to end the evil in this world. We have to recognize that al Qaeda simply didn't spring up on its own. The evil route was Nazism. The al Qaeda Doctrine is the same as the Arab Nazis held. They hated Jews, they hate democracy, and they hate Westerners for Western culture. Al Qaeda is nothing more than the religious expression of Arab Fascism. We allowed this branch of the Nazi trunk to survive, to flourish, and it has come back to haunt us.

The enemies are a creation of our own government, indirectly, fighting the Russians in Afghanistan. Then problems arose form neglect of monitoring their activities when they were moved to Saudi. Taxation for the creation and taxation for the destruction and taxation for the rebuilding. Not to mention paying taxes for the lawsuits that will come after this admin. is long gone.

Has anyone here considered the fact that if we funded the Muslim Nazis to fight Russian in Afghanistan, then why wouldn't the Russians do the same to us? Menaing the funding of the insurgence and/or Al Qaeda.

The Nazi/CIA/Saudi/al Qaeda Connection

What the British did then, they sold the Arab Nazis to the predecessor of what became the CIA. It may sound stupid; it may sound evil, but it did happen. The idea was that we were going to use the Arab Nazis in the Middle East as a counterweight to the Arab communists. Just as the Soviet Union was funding Arab communists, we would fund the Arab Nazis to fight against. And lots of secret classes took place. We kept the Muslim Brotherhood on our payroll.

But the Egyptians became nervous. Nasser ordered all of the Muslim Brotherhood out of Egypt or be imprisoned, and we would execute them all. During the 1950's, the CIA evacuated the Nazis of the Muslim Brotherhood to Saudi Arabia. Now when they arrived in Saudi Arabia, some of the leading lights of the Muslim Brotherhood like Azzam, became the teachers in the Madrasas, the religious schools. And there they combined the doctrines of Nazism with this weird Islamic cult, Wahhabiism.

Everyone thinks that Islam is this fanatical religion, but it is not. They think that Islam -- the Saudi version of Islam - -is typical, but it's not. The Wahhabi cult was condemned as a heresy more than 60 times by the Muslim nations. But when the Saudis got wealthy, they bought a lot of silence. This is a very harsh cult. The Wahhabiism was only practiced by two nations, the Taliban and Saudi Arabia. That's how extreme it is. It really has nothing to do with Islam. Islam is a very peaceful and tolerant religion. It has always had good relationships with the Jews for the first thousand years of its existence.

For the Saudis, there was a ruler in charge of Saudi Arabia, and they were the new home of the Muslim Brotherhood, and fascism and extremism were mingled in these schools. And there was a young student who paid attention - - and Azzam's student was named Osama Bin Ladin. Osama Bin Ladin was taught by the Nazis of the Muslim Brotherhood who had emigrated to Saudi Arabia.

http://www.navyseals.com/community/article...cle.cfm?id=4328

You weren't a little tight earlier were you, there AURaptor?

http://www.pro-american.com/forums/printthread.php?t=12241

[AURaptor 1,125]

The enemies are a creation of our own government, indirectly, fighting the Russians in Afghanistan. Then problems arose form neglect of monitoring their activities when they were moved to Saudi. Taxation for the creation and taxation for the destruction and taxation for the rebuilding. Not to mention paying taxes for the lawsuits that will come after this admin. is long gone.

Has anyone here considered the fact that if we funded the Muslim Nazis to fight Russian in Afghanistan, then why wouldn't the Russians do the same to us? Menaing the funding of the insurgence and/or Al Qaeda.

The enemies are NOT 'our' creation, direct or other wise. Their religious dogma existed long before we sent any Stinger missles over to Afghanistan. And we knew what / who we were dealing with, but a choice had to be made. Do nothing and watch the Soviet Union devour yet another country and move closer to the M.E. oil fields AND a warm water port, OR try to stop them in their tracks. Had the Soviets taken Iran or Pakistan next, Communism might not have fallen as it did.

Iran seems to have more to gain from funding the Islamo terrorist than the current Russian Gov't. Remember, it's al-Qaeda that is helping their Chechen brothers slaughter Russian school children and trying to blow up opera houses. While there may be some old school Soviets still around in the Gov't, I don't think there's an overall grudge in Moscow over what happened 25 yrs ago.