Tigermike 3,046 Posted July 8, 2008 Share Posted July 8, 2008 A new kind of politics? I think not. Just another hypocrite. "We've got to run a different kind of campaign. So we're not going to go around doing negative ads. We're going to keep it positive. We're going to talk about the issues." - Sen. Barack Obama You know an attack ad when you see it. They have lots of red text and "ominous" stills. They have that voice. You've seen them. The DNC has been running them for months now against John McCain. Senator Obama, though, is bringing a new kind of politics. Right? If the New York Times knows it's a negative ad, then it's a negative ad. Negative, as in not "positive." As the McCain campaign said today, "Barack Obama's commitment to a new type of politics is officially over." Obama's commitment to not airing negative ads apparently had as much weight as his promise to use public financing. He's the candidate of change, alright. He does it all the time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
au2004ece 30 Posted July 8, 2008 Share Posted July 8, 2008 What I don't get about all of Obama's acting like a centrist and his win at all costs campaign is this: he was going to win anyway since everybody hates Bush. Is he that insecure in his liberal socialist beliefs that he believes he needs to lie or act like he is something else? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rexbo 104 Posted July 8, 2008 Share Posted July 8, 2008 Is he that insecure in his liberal socialist beliefs that he believes he needs to lie or act like he is something else? He's so secure in his liberal socialist backers that he knows he can say anything, even that we should nuke Iran before they nuke us, and they will still vote for him... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TexasTiger 12,979 Posted July 9, 2008 Share Posted July 9, 2008 As the McCain campaign said today, "Barack Obama's commitment to a new type of politics is officially over." You guys are hilarious. McCain camp says it, you guys regurgitate it as reliably as Pavlov's dog. Negative? It's a DIRECT response to McCain's ad against Obama. A factual reply-- Oh, the horror!!! http://www.newsweek.com/id/143344 "Why isn't Obama just laying down and taking it!!!" "He's mean. Mommy!!!" I miss the days when McCain wasn't so whiny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tigermike 3,046 Posted July 9, 2008 Author Share Posted July 9, 2008 As the McCain campaign said today, "Barack Obama's commitment to a new type of politics is officially over." You guys are hilarious. McCain camp says it, you guys regurgitate it as reliably as Pavlov's dog. Negative? It's a DIRECT response to McCain's ad against Obama. A factual reply-- Oh, the horror!!! http://www.newsweek.com/id/143344 "Why isn't Obama just laying down and taking it!!!" "He's mean. Mommy!!!" I miss the days when McCain wasn't so whiny. And if you were responding to the ads linked, you would have a point. I miss the days when Obama actually meant what he said and said what he meant. Ooops, never mind that has never happened. A new kind of politics? I think not. Just another hypocrite. "We've got to run a different kind of campaign. So we're not going to go around doing negative ads. We're going to keep it positive. We're going to talk about the issues." - Sen. Barack Obama Hypocrite thy name is Barrack Obama Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TexasTiger 12,979 Posted July 9, 2008 Share Posted July 9, 2008 As the McCain campaign said today, "Barack Obama's commitment to a new type of politics is officially over." You guys are hilarious. McCain camp says it, you guys regurgitate it as reliably as Pavlov's dog. Negative? It's a DIRECT response to McCain's ad against Obama. A factual reply-- Oh, the horror!!! http://www.newsweek.com/id/143344 "Why isn't Obama just laying down and taking it!!!" "He's mean. Mommy!!!" I miss the days when McCain wasn't so whiny. And if you were responding to the ads linked, you would have a point. I miss the days when Obama actually meant what he said and said what he meant. Ooops, never mind that has never happened. A new kind of politics? I think not. Just another hypocrite. "We've got to run a different kind of campaign. So we're not going to go around doing negative ads. We're going to keep it positive. We're going to talk about the issues." - Sen. Barack Obama Hypocrite thy name is Barrack Obama So when a Dem responds to a Republican ad, that's negative? Please define how your using the term, so we'll have a working definition for the breadth of the campaign. Here's McCain's tv ad that rain currently with his dishonest attack ad on the web: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tigermike 3,046 Posted July 9, 2008 Author Share Posted July 9, 2008 Let me quote the New York Times: "Updated Senator Barack Obama has begun his first negative television advertising campaign of the general election, calling Senator John McCain “part of the problem†of high gas prices." "We've got to run a different kind of campaign. So we're not going to go around doing negative ads. We're going to keep it positive. We're going to talk about the issues." - Sen. Barack Obama I will say again: If the New York Times knows it's a negative ad, then it's a negative ad. Negative, as in not "positive." As the McCain campaign said today, "Barack Obama's commitment to a new type of politics is officially over." If the NY Times says its negative, then it must be negative. Afterall you and the dims have agreed with the NYT, in leaking documents, Valarie Plame, anti Bush, anti Bush, anti Bush. so why not now Tex? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TexasTiger 12,979 Posted July 9, 2008 Share Posted July 9, 2008 Let me quote the New York Times: "Updated Senator Barack Obama has begun his first negative television advertising campaign of the general election, calling Senator John McCain “part of the problem†of high gas prices." "We've got to run a different kind of campaign. So we're not going to go around doing negative ads. We're going to keep it positive. We're going to talk about the issues." - Sen. Barack Obama I will say again: If the New York Times knows it's a negative ad, then it's a negative ad. Negative, as in not "positive." As the McCain campaign said today, "Barack Obama's commitment to a new type of politics is officially over." If the NY Times says its negative, then it must be negative. Afterall you and the dims have agreed with the NYT, in leaking documents, Valarie Plame, anti Bush, anti Bush, anti Bush. so why not now Tex? Okay, I understand. From this point forward, the NYTs speaks for TigerMike. Got it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tigermike 3,046 Posted July 9, 2008 Author Share Posted July 9, 2008 Let me quote the New York Times: "Updated Senator Barack Obama has begun his first negative television advertising campaign of the general election, calling Senator John McCain “part of the problem†of high gas prices." "We've got to run a different kind of campaign. So we're not going to go around doing negative ads. We're going to keep it positive. We're going to talk about the issues." - Sen. Barack Obama I will say again: If the New York Times knows it's a negative ad, then it's a negative ad. Negative, as in not "positive." As the McCain campaign said today, "Barack Obama's commitment to a new type of politics is officially over." If the NY Times says its negative, then it must be negative. Afterall you and the dims have agreed with the NYT, in leaking documents, Valarie Plame, anti Bush, anti Bush, anti Bush. so why not now Tex? Okay, I understand. From this point forward, the NYTs speaks for TigerMike. Got it. Nope but I will use their articles to make a point. And as you know I have linked to the NYT many on other occasions as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arnaldoabru 11 Posted July 9, 2008 Share Posted July 9, 2008 Is he that insecure in his liberal socialist beliefs that he believes he needs to lie or act like he is something else? He's so secure in his liberal socialist backers that he knows he can say anything, even that we should nuke Iran before they nuke us, and they will still vote for him... And your quoting Condy Rice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheDrewYouKnew 3 Posted July 9, 2008 Share Posted July 9, 2008 As the McCain campaign said today, "Barack Obama's commitment to a new type of politics is officially over." You guys are hilarious. McCain camp says it, you guys regurgitate it as reliably as Pavlov's dog. Negative? It's a DIRECT response to McCain's ad against Obama. A factual reply-- Oh, the horror!!! http://www.newsweek.com/id/143344 "Why isn't Obama just laying down and taking it!!!" "He's mean. Mommy!!!" I miss the days when McCain wasn't so whiny. Wow, you are too cool for school. By the way, pot meet kettle. You are not smarter than anyone on here. That would have been a nice reference to Pavlov if it makes any sense in the context you used it in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
autiger4life 3 Posted July 9, 2008 Share Posted July 9, 2008 Is he that insecure in his liberal socialist beliefs that he believes he needs to lie or act like he is something else? Meet Richard Nixon, except not liberal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TexasTiger 12,979 Posted July 9, 2008 Share Posted July 9, 2008 That would have been a nice reference to Pavlov if it makes any sense in the context you used it in. You respond reflexively on cue, even if there is no substance being provided by your master. No real thinking is employed. Don't feel bad, Drew, the dog didn't realize what he was doing either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheDrewYouKnew 3 Posted July 9, 2008 Share Posted July 9, 2008 That would have been a nice reference to Pavlov if it makes any sense in the context you used it in. You respond reflexively on cue, even if there is no substance being provided by your master. No real thinking is employed. Don't feel bad, Drew, the dog didn't realize what he was doing either. That's all you got? It took you 53 minutes to come up with that?! I guess you win. I will become a liberal now. ALL HAIL OBAMA!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
autigeremt 6,660 Posted July 9, 2008 Share Posted July 9, 2008 Texas drinks Kool-Aid and smokes lucky strikes. Obama isn't what he "said" he was a few months back. It's getting him in trouble with the voters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.