TMAN34 0 Posted October 27, 2009 Share Posted October 27, 2009 Who in here believes in Global Warming? I would like to know how many idiots and psychotic morons we have here. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article6891362.ece Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SouthLink02 8 Posted October 27, 2009 Share Posted October 27, 2009 I would like to know how many idiots and psychotic morons we have here. Just put a poll up asking who voted for George Bush in 2004. Should answer your question quite easily Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldNewby 27 Posted October 27, 2009 Share Posted October 27, 2009 FTR, I voted for Auburn in 2004. And personally, I find beans cause more gas. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lukeduke 8 Posted October 27, 2009 Share Posted October 27, 2009 I personally don't think global warming is true, but then again you can skew numbers to support either side. Some wackos would still be screaming it in the middle of an ice age and some would be denying it on beachfront property in Omaha. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MDM4AU 336 Posted October 27, 2009 Share Posted October 27, 2009 Here is a link from November where many of the Bush 2004 supporters actually discuss this topic quite articulately. What's your thought on Global Warming, SLink? I'll give you time to consult with your new friends at ThinkProgress. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
au2004ece 30 Posted October 28, 2009 Share Posted October 28, 2009 Global Warming exists. Global Cooling exists at other times. The Earth warms and cools. There is climate change, but whether it is manmade (and what percentage of it is manmade) is reasonable to doubt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldNewby 27 Posted October 28, 2009 Share Posted October 28, 2009 Yes, I'm guilty. I farted towards Al Gore's general GPS coordinates. White beans, pinto beans, butter beans, baked beans - hey, I'm a beanatarian. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aufan59 80 Posted October 28, 2009 Share Posted October 28, 2009 Who in here believes in Global Warming? I would like to know how many idiots and psychotic morons we have here. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article6891362.ece There is good reason to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. A climate changing mechanism exists, and its exact effects are hard to pinpoint. It should be considered an unknown risk. But global warming is used as a mechanism to control people and energy production. The solution to global warming is using nuclear power. But the goals of this administration and the left isn't reduction in global warming, it is capping human energy production. They do not trust people with cheap, abundant energy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
au2004ece 30 Posted October 29, 2009 Share Posted October 29, 2009 The solution to global warming is using nuclear power. But the goals of this administration and the left isn't reduction in global warming, it is capping human energy production. They do not trust people with cheap, abundant energy. Yep. They won't allow new nuclear plants, and they won't allow new oil refineries that would be more efficient, and they won't allow new coal plants that would be more efficient that older ones. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SouthLink02 8 Posted October 29, 2009 Share Posted October 29, 2009 What's your thought on Global Warming, SLink? The same as they have always been. I have no idea. Something that should be stated more by about 99% of this country on such issues. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
au2004ece 30 Posted October 29, 2009 Share Posted October 29, 2009 What's your thought on Global Warming, SLink? The same as they have always been. I have no idea. Something that should be stated more by about 99% of this country on such issues. If 99% of the country has no idea, then why does a large portion support candidates that would tax the hell out of us to prevent something that they have no idea whether it is exists or not. Why are they blindly following those candidates? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SouthLink02 8 Posted October 29, 2009 Share Posted October 29, 2009 What's your thought on Global Warming, SLink? The same as they have always been. I have no idea. Something that should be stated more by about 99% of this country on such issues. If 99% of the country has no idea, then why does a large portion support candidates that would tax the hell out of us to prevent something that they have no idea whether it is exists or not. Why are they blindly following those candidates? For the same reason they would elect a moron like Bush for a 2nd term? Who knows Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
au2004ece 30 Posted October 29, 2009 Share Posted October 29, 2009 What's your thought on Global Warming, SLink? The same as they have always been. I have no idea. Something that should be stated more by about 99% of this country on such issues. If 99% of the country has no idea, then why does a large portion support candidates that would tax the hell out of us to prevent something that they have no idea whether it is exists or not. Why are they blindly following those candidates? For the same reason they would elect a moron like Bush for a 2nd term? Who knows Deflection. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
autigeremt 6,717 Posted October 29, 2009 Share Posted October 29, 2009 What's your thought on Global Warming, SLink? The same as they have always been. I have no idea. Something that should be stated more by about 99% of this country on such issues. If 99% of the country has no idea, then why does a large portion support candidates that would tax the hell out of us to prevent something that they have no idea whether it is exists or not. Why are they blindly following those candidates? For the same reason they would elect a moron like Bush for a 2nd term? Who knows Who is the bigger moron? Someone who voted for Bush in 2004, or someone who voted for John Kerry? I think it's best to slam the Dems for having such a candidate as Kerry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SouthLink02 8 Posted October 29, 2009 Share Posted October 29, 2009 What's your thought on Global Warming, SLink? The same as they have always been. I have no idea. Something that should be stated more by about 99% of this country on such issues. If 99% of the country has no idea, then why does a large portion support candidates that would tax the hell out of us to prevent something that they have no idea whether it is exists or not. Why are they blindly following those candidates? For the same reason they would elect a moron like Bush for a 2nd term? Who knows Who is the bigger moron? Someone who voted for Bush in 2004, or someone who voted for John Kerry? I think it's best to slam the Dems for having such a candidate as Kerry. Bush But Kerry was bad, I will admit that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SouthLink02 8 Posted October 29, 2009 Share Posted October 29, 2009 What's your thought on Global Warming, SLink? The same as they have always been. I have no idea. Something that should be stated more by about 99% of this country on such issues. If 99% of the country has no idea, then why does a large portion support candidates that would tax the hell out of us to prevent something that they have no idea whether it is exists or not. Why are they blindly following those candidates? For the same reason they would elect a moron like Bush for a 2nd term? Who knows Deflection. No, I actually meant that....I really don't know. I don't know why the public majority does a lot of things Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
au2004ece 30 Posted October 29, 2009 Share Posted October 29, 2009 What's your thought on Global Warming, SLink? The same as they have always been. I have no idea. Something that should be stated more by about 99% of this country on such issues. If 99% of the country has no idea, then why does a large portion support candidates that would tax the hell out of us to prevent something that they have no idea whether it is exists or not. Why are they blindly following those candidates? For the same reason they would elect a moron like Bush for a 2nd term? Who knows Deflection. No, I actually meant that....I really don't know. I don't know why the public majority does a lot of things The deflection was the part about people electing Bush. That had no bearing on the question asked. The correct answer of "who knows" was fine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SouthLink02 8 Posted October 29, 2009 Share Posted October 29, 2009 The deflection was the part about people electing Bush. That had no bearing on the question asked. The correct answer of "who knows" was fine. That wasn't a deflection. That was just an example of me not knowing why the public does something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arnaldoabru 11 Posted October 30, 2009 Share Posted October 30, 2009 The solution to global warming is using nuclear power. But the goals of this administration and the left isn't reduction in global warming, it is capping human energy production. They do not trust people with cheap, abundant energy. Yep. They won't allow new nuclear plants, and they won't allow new oil refineries that would be more efficient, and they won't allow new coal plants that would be more efficient that older ones. New oil refineries are not being built because of the oil companies. Matter of fact, they bought independant refineries and shut them down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TigerHeat 9 Posted October 30, 2009 Share Posted October 30, 2009 The solution to global warming is using nuclear power. But the goals of this administration and the left isn't reduction in global warming, it is capping human energy production. They do not trust people with cheap, abundant energy. Yep. They won't allow new nuclear plants, and they won't allow new oil refineries that would be more efficient, and they won't allow new coal plants that would be more efficient that older ones. New oil refineries are not being built because of the oil companies. Matter of fact, they bought independant refineries and shut them down. Got a link? Here's mine: refineries face shutdowns Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AURaptor 1,128 Posted October 30, 2009 Share Posted October 30, 2009 Who in here believes in Global Warming? I would like to know how many idiots and psychotic morons we have here. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article6891362.ece While I have made my views on the man caused 'Climate Change' scam very clear, I think I'd have gone a different way in starting out a thread in this manner. But I agree, you've got to be very ignorant or very naive to buy into Climate Change. ( And, on a side note, voting for Bush in '00 or '04 made a world of common sense. Gore or Kerry would have only brought Obama like disaster to us earlier. ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
autigeremt 6,717 Posted October 30, 2009 Share Posted October 30, 2009 It should be about pollution reduction! If you reduce/cease pollution, the rest takes care of itself. Politics will destroy what's best for the American people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arnaldoabru 11 Posted October 30, 2009 Share Posted October 30, 2009 The solution to global warming is using nuclear power. But the goals of this administration and the left isn't reduction in global warming, it is capping human energy production. They do not trust people with cheap, abundant energy. Yep. They won't allow new nuclear plants, and they won't allow new oil refineries that would be more efficient, and they won't allow new coal plants that would be more efficient that older ones. New oil refineries are not being built because of the oil companies. Matter of fact, they bought independant refineries and shut them down. Got a link? Here's mine: refineries face shutdowns http://www.rawstory.com/news/2005/Group_Internal_memos_show_oil_companies_limited_refineries_to_drive_up__0907.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TigerHeat 9 Posted October 30, 2009 Share Posted October 30, 2009 The solution to global warming is using nuclear power. But the goals of this administration and the left isn't reduction in global warming, it is capping human energy production. They do not trust people with cheap, abundant energy. Yep. They won't allow new nuclear plants, and they won't allow new oil refineries that would be more efficient, and they won't allow new coal plants that would be more efficient that older ones. New oil refineries are not being built because of the oil companies. Matter of fact, they bought independant refineries and shut them down. Got a link? Here's mine: refineries face shutdowns http://www.rawstory.com/news/2005/Group_Internal_memos_show_oil_companies_limited_refineries_to_drive_up__0907.html This article was very disingenuous. What would you do with a surplus capacity that costs money to maintain? They're not in business to provide the goat mobile with discount gas. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.