AUAeroEngineer 0 Posted June 11, 2010 Share Posted June 11, 2010 Just for clarification purposes, Classic look: Modern look: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Autiger88 Posted June 11, 2010 Share Posted June 11, 2010 What are you meaning? Pants or what??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUAeroEngineer 0 Posted June 11, 2010 Author Share Posted June 11, 2010 Mainly pants and socks but also whether the bill is bent at all. I couldn't find a good one for the modern day version with someone who wasn't wearing a batting helmet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Autiger88 Posted June 11, 2010 Share Posted June 11, 2010 I personally don't really care as long as they play Baseball But if I had to choose the Classic works for me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
imsoauburn 0 Posted June 11, 2010 Share Posted June 11, 2010 Man Prince Fielder doesnt do the modern look too much justice Regardless i like the classic look. Thats how ide wear it. Pretty much flat bill though except for a little bend in it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUAeroEngineer 0 Posted June 11, 2010 Author Share Posted June 11, 2010 Yeah he really doesn't and I don't blame him for wearing such baggy stuff that is one big guy. I just wanted to exaggerate the look. But I hate that pretty much every team wears baggy pants nowadays. The hat bill doesn't really get me as much but I do like a bend in it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevon67 2,368 Posted June 11, 2010 Share Posted June 11, 2010 Man Prince Fielder doesnt do the modern look too much justice Regardless i like the classic look. Thats how ide wear it. Pretty much flat bill though except for a little bend in it. You took the words right out of my mouth, 1st thing I noticed , I would say classic because I like ole school anything pretty much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bro Johnny Mac 1,398 Posted June 12, 2010 Share Posted June 12, 2010 I played ball all the way through college and a little after(around 1989) and Im happy to say I missed the fad of wearing baseball pants that look like over sized pajamas Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jackson-Sullivan 0 Posted June 14, 2010 Share Posted June 14, 2010 It's kind of funny that the actual "classic" look is the baggy look that you are seeing these days. The only difference is the material (scratchy wool) was different and they always had them pulled up close to the knees like the OP's classic look, instead of the wide bottoms covering the shoe. Linked is a nice little read on the evolution of baseball unis. MASH: http://www.baseball-almanac.com/articles/uniforms.shtml Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
augolf1716 21,223 Posted June 14, 2010 Share Posted June 14, 2010 Now this is a classic baseball uniform. imo of course Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronald McDonald 0 Posted June 14, 2010 Share Posted June 14, 2010 Now this is a classic baseball uniform. imo of course We are going for classic not ancient! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guerra aguila 0 Posted June 14, 2010 Share Posted June 14, 2010 Now this is a classic baseball uniform. imo of course We are going for classic not ancient! Lol, funny stuff West. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
augolf1716 21,223 Posted June 14, 2010 Share Posted June 14, 2010 Now this is a classic baseball uniform. imo of course We are going for classic not ancient! Lol, funny stuff West. You would think so ga since you're only 29 or is it 27 or 25 or 23 :P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronald McDonald 0 Posted June 14, 2010 Share Posted June 14, 2010 :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bro Johnny Mac 1,398 Posted June 15, 2010 Share Posted June 15, 2010 It's kind of funny that the actual "classic" look is the baggy look that you are seeing these days. The only difference is the material (scratchy wool) was different and they always had them pulled up close to the knees like the OP's classic look, instead of the wide bottoms covering the shoe. Linked is a nice little read on the evolution of baseball unis. MASH: http://www.baseball-almanac.com/articles/uniforms.shtml I hear ya,its the EXTRA long pants that I dont like,no sterrups= no baseball uni IMO.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.