OffensiveAlchemy 6 Posted August 30, 2011 Share Posted August 30, 2011 I just listened to the CGC presser and he was asked about why O'mac was listed first, and Dyer second. Of course CGC's answer was "don't read too much into it," but I believe that the depth chart was set that way as a complement to O'Mac and all the work he has put in. He has put on weight, worked on his vertical running, and has become a leader. I'm sure there will be message board spin that it was a shot, or a warning to Dyer because he missed a practice or two, but we know the truth. Fearless and True. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUCrete 0 Posted August 30, 2011 Share Posted August 30, 2011 If MD doesn't play at all Saturday, then I'll be concerned. Until then... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
auriptide 0 Posted August 30, 2011 Share Posted August 30, 2011 I just listened to the CGC presser and he was asked about why O'mac was listed first, and Dyer second. Of course CGC's answer was "don't read too much into it," but I believe that the depth chart was set that way as a complement to O'Mac and all the work he has put in. He has put on weight, worked on his vertical running, and has become a leader. I'm sure there will be message board spin that it was a shot, or a warning to Dyer because he missed a practice or two, but we know the truth. Fearless and True. Looking at the rest of depth chart...........I think it's more of a upper classmen thing. JMO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shift 350 Posted August 30, 2011 Share Posted August 30, 2011 Malzhan's offense utilizes multiple players in multiple sets so I don't read too much into #1 RB vs #2 RB on the depth chart. Dyer and OMAC will rotate in and out depending on the play so it really doesn't matter who is #1 or #2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OffensiveAlchemy 6 Posted August 30, 2011 Author Share Posted August 30, 2011 I'm looking forward to watching O'mac catching the ball out of the backfield like he did towards the end of last season. Talk about a home run threat! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keesler 5,926 Posted August 30, 2011 Share Posted August 30, 2011 There's not way to list the depth chart as #1a RB and #1b RB is there? 'Cause IMO that's exactly what OMc & MD are to this offense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meatsick 0 Posted August 30, 2011 Share Posted August 30, 2011 I just listened to the CGC presser and he was asked about why O'mac was listed first, and Dyer second. Of course CGC's answer was "don't read too much into it," but I believe that the depth chart was set that way as a complement to O'Mac and all the work he has put in. He has put on weight, worked on his vertical running, and has become a leader. I'm sure there will be message board spin that it was a shot, or a warning to Dyer because he missed a practice or two, but we know the truth. Fearless and True. Looking at the rest of depth chart...........I think it's more of a upper classmen thing. JMO Pretty sure it's this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
telling tiger 156 Posted August 30, 2011 Share Posted August 30, 2011 No disrespect intended to the op, I'm about to bash the forum/internet/blog reactions. If the man tied his left shoe first instead of his right one, someone would say that had some ulterior motive or message. It's just not that big of a deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JMassie11 1,610 Posted August 30, 2011 Share Posted August 30, 2011 The reason he's starting is bc he fits in better to the 1st script of plays that's all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
War Eagle TN 0 Posted August 30, 2011 Share Posted August 30, 2011 The reason he's starting is bc he fits in better to the 1st script of plays that's all DITTO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bwillaub 0 Posted August 30, 2011 Share Posted August 30, 2011 I believe OMac was listed as the "starter" in the NC game as well. We saw how that developed. MD will get his share of carries. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.