What do you want to see against Samford?

[bigbird 60,580]

7 minutes ago, TexasTiger said:

The first interception likely wouldn’t have happened if the previous low percentage corner passes weren’t called.

It's a TD if Hooks jumps at all. Terrible effort on that one

[TitanTiger 20,542]

49 minutes ago, TexasTiger said:

The first interception likely wouldn’t have happened if the previous low percentage corner passes weren’t called.

I would agree. But this is the kind of game to work on stuff, so while I didn’t like the INT, I get why we did it. 

[Strychnine 1,804]

5 minutes ago, TitanTiger said:

I would agree. But this is the kind of game to work on stuff, so while I didn’t like the INT, I get why we did it. 

It was obviously a gameplan that favored working on passing offense, as plenty of people seemed to hope for.  The mistakes are coaching opportunities, and I suspect coaches will make the best of them.  They could have probably put together a 400+ rushing gameplan, that wins in prettier fashion, but helps no one.

[TexasTiger 13,136]

1 hour ago, TitanTiger said:

I would agree. But this is the kind of game to work on stuff, so while I didn’t like the INT, I get why we did it. 

I’m thinking mostly of the moronic announcers going on and on about 2 interceptions in the end zone. I was pretty pleased with Thorne’s performance.

[LPTiger 5,202]

Disappointed in the oline in short yardage situations.

[TitanTiger 20,542]

7 hours ago, TexasTiger said:

I’m thinking mostly of the moronic announcers going on and on about 2 interceptions in the end zone. I was pretty pleased with Thorne’s performance.

Well luckily I was at the game and didn’t have to listen to such BS.