Robert Hur is a liar and Jim Jordan’s latest hearing blew up in his big dumb face

[aubiefifty 16,873]

98@yahoo.com

 

Wed, Mar 13 at 10:25 AM

 

 

	Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more Robert Hur is a ******* liar and Jim Jordan’s latest hearing blew up in his big dumb face once again, Democrats brought the heat Jeff Tiedrich Mar 13     READ IN APP   is Jim Jordan a masochist? does he get off on being publicly humiliated? it’s a legit question, because yesterday, the shouty half-dressed degenerate wrestling coach pantsed himself on live television for like the eleventy-millionth time. Upgrade to paid ever since that whole “impeaching Joe Biden for imaginary corruption” thing didn’t pan out (pro tip: don’t get conned by Russian spies), Jimmy and his partner in idiocy, Comer Fudd, have been sniffing up the pantleg of a new line of attack: we’re gonna figure out just how old Joe Biden is, and we’re gonna impeach him for that. Jimmy Jord’s star witness for yesterday’s hearing was MAGA stooge Robert Hur, the former Special Counsel who, it must be stressed, had exonerated Biden for that whole Hey DOJ, I Found Some Classified Documents, Come Take Them Back affair. Robert Hur is hot garbage — and a ******* liar — because at the center of this whole JoE bIdEn iS ToO oLd hysteria — a twenty-megaton panic attack that kept the Ezra Kleins of the world running around with their hair on fire for a solid ******* month — has been Hur’s allegation that Biden is quote-unquote “an elderly man with a poor memory” who couldn’t remember when his son Beau died. and guess what — that was a ******* lie. Hur made the whole thing up. yesterday morning, just before the hearing started, the Washington Post published the transcript of Hur’s five-hour-long interview with Biden — and oh, look: here’s Biden’s actual answer to the question: “What month did Beau die? Oh God, May 30.” got that? Hur lied. which, by the way, raises the question: why the **** did Merrick Garland sit on the interview transcript for a solid month before releasing it? he could have put it out the same day as the report, and saved us all weeks of teeth-gnashing and garment-rending. I keep trying to give Garland the benefit of the doubt, but seriously, he keeps making these errors of judgment. what the hell, Merrick? oh, and check this out: “you appear to have a photographic understanding and recall.” that is verbatim what Hur said to Biden — and during yesterday’s hearing, Eric Swalwell pressed Hur on that point. Swalwell: “I now want to turn you the transcript and day one, page 47. you said to President Biden, ‘you have … appear to have a photographic understanding and recall of the House.’ did you say that to President Biden?” Hur: “[long pause] those words do appear on page 47 of the transcript.” Swalwell: “‘photographic’ is what you said, is that right?” Hur: “that word does appear on page 47 of the transcript.” Swalwell: “never appeared in your report, though, is that correct? the word ‘photographic’?” Hur: “it does not appear in my report.” what a slimy little shitweasel Hur is. he never actually admits to saying what he obviously said. he just agrees that it’s in the transcript — like it just magically appeared there. yeah, maybe that’s what it says in the transcript, but look over there — space aliens! Democrats used Hur for a chew toy and it was glorious to behold. Madeleine Dean: “I want to give you a chance, since the transcript is out, to correct the record on an important point. very sadly, your report on page 208 says that Mr. Biden couldn’t come up with the date, the year, of his son Beau Biden’s death, when in fact in the transcript that you asked him the month, and do you know what he said, Mr. Hur? he said ‘oh god, May 30th.’ would you like to correct the record? his memory was pretty firm on the month and the day.” Hur: “congresswoman, I don’t believe that’s correct in respect to the transcript. but if you could refer me to a specific page, I’d be happy to look.” Dean: “to clarify for you, sir, Mr. Hur, from the transcription, page 82. the words are President Biden’s. ‘what month did Beau die? oh god, May 30th.’” Hur ‘doesn’t believe that’s correct’? look at him flip through his copy of the transcript, totally bewildered to find his own words staring him back in the face. how could this have happened? did Democrats use the hearing to contrast the difference between Biden and Trump? you ******* well bet they did. bring it, Ted Lieu: Lieu: “here’s my first question. in your investigation, did you find that President Biden directed his lawyer to lie to the FBI?” Hur: “we identified no such evidence.” Lieu: “did you find that President Biden directed his lawyer to destroy classified documents?” Hur: “nope.” Lieu: “did you find that President Biden directed his personal assistant to move boxes of documents and hide them from the FBI?” Hur: “no.” Lieu: “did you find that President Biden directed his personal assistant to delete security camera footage, after the FBI asked for that footage?” Hur: “no.” Lieu: “did you find that President Biden showed a classified map related to an ongoing military operation to a campaign aide who did not have clearance.” Hur: no.” Lieu: “did you find that President Biden engaged in a conspiracy to obstruct justice?” Hur: “no.” Lieu: “did you find that President Biden engaged in a scheme to conceal?” Hur: “no.” Lieu: “each of the activities I just laid out describe what Donald Trump did in his willful mishandling of classified information and his criminal efforts to deceive the FBI. in contrast, President Biden handed over documents without delay and complied fully with investigators. Adam Schiff took Hur to the woodshed and beat him like a rented mule. Schiff: “what you did write was deeply prejudicial to the interest of president, and you say it wasn’t political, and yet must have understood — you must have understood the impact of your words. you must have understood the impact of your decision to go beyond the specifics of a particular document to go … to your own prejudicial opinion about the president — one you knew would be amplified by his political opponent. you knew that would influence a political campaign. you had to understand that.” Republicans, for their part, were also hella mad at Hur — for not charging Biden with any crimes. here’s GOP Rep Tom Tiffany: “I want to thank you for the work you did as far as you could, but unfortunately you are part of the praetorian guard that guards that swamp out here in Washington DC, protecting the elites.” yeah, Hur certainly protected the elites, all right — by igniting a month-long feeding frenzy over Sleepy Joe’s imaginary decline. only in Republicanland does that make any ******* sense. and they were pissed off at Merrick Garland, too — for releasing the transcript. “I don’t think it serves this process well for the Justice Department to dump these transcripts into the public right now.” yes, it’s so unfair of Garland to prevent Republicans from being able to lie about Biden’s cognitive acuity — because without lies, the GOP ain’t got s***. boo ******* hoo, crybabies. honestly, the whole hearing could have been an email: Scott Fitzgerald: “Attorney Hur, Webster’s Dictionary defines ‘senile’ as ‘exhibiting a decline of cognitive ability, such as memory associated with old age.’ Mr Hur, based on your report, did you find that the president was senile?” Hur: “I did not.” end of story. the hearing ended not with a bang, but with a whimper. so I guess that’s it for the impeach Joe Biden for being old thing — but don’t worry, it won’t be too long before the Jimmys get a hankering for kicking themselves in the nuts again, and concoct some new cockamamie reason for impeaching Biden. it’s a long way to November, and Dear Leader demands an impeachment, so he can have something to run on besides I don’t want to go to prison. it’s probably too much to ask our worthless corporate-controlled media to stop letting themselves get played by Republican operatives and MAGA stooges like Robert Hur. they could have demanded to see the actual transcripts, insteal of falling all over each other in a mad dash to be the first to report that Sleepy Brandon is senile. Democrats, can we talk? there’s a lesson for you to learn here: this “we’re appointing a Republican to investigate us in order to appear fair” bull**** doesn’t work. it didn’t work when Janet Reno named Robert Fisk and Ken Starr to investigate Bill Clinton. it didn’t work when Barack Obama let James Comey go after the email lady. and it sure as hell did not work when Merrick Garland appointed MAGA operative Robert Hur. for ****’s sake, Hur is the guy wrote the false summary that Bill Barr used to mislead everyone about the Mueller Report. this is the guy you choose to investigate Biden? Republicans will **** you every time. stop giving them the opportunity. notice that Republicans never appoint Democrats to head investigations. why do you think that is? figure it out. everyone is entitled to my own opinion is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

[I_M4_AU 7,949]

Two choices, fifty.  Biden is too senile and old to stand trial or he is as sharp as he ever was and should stand trial.  Which do you think the Dems will go?

[aubiefifty 16,873]

Just now, I_M4_AU said:

Two choices, fifty.  Biden is too senile and old to stand trial or he is as sharp as he ever was and should stand trial.  Which do you think the Dems will go?

did you read the article? they are both old. trump screws up stuff every single day.

[I_M4_AU 7,949]

9 minutes ago, aubiefifty said:

did you read the article? they are both old. trump screws up stuff every single day.

That guy is so bias you really can’t take anything he prints as serious.

[homersapien 11,426]

Man, how I would love to see an investigation of Jim Jordan's history during the Ohio State sexual abuse scandal.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/rep-jim-jordan-turned-blind-eye-sex-abuse/story?id=104060698

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/former-osu-wrestlers-say-jim-jordan-betrayed-shouldnt-house-speaker-rcna119116

https://www.cnn.com/2020/03/06/politics/jordan-osu-wrestlers-strauss-invs/index.html

[creed 1,645]

2 hours ago, aubiefifty said:

98@yahoo.com

 

Wed, Mar 13 at 10:25 AM

 

 

	Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more Robert Hur is a ******* liar and Jim Jordan’s latest hearing blew up in his big dumb face once again, Democrats brought the heat Jeff Tiedrich Mar 13     READ IN APP   is Jim Jordan a masochist? does he get off on being publicly humiliated? it’s a legit question, because yesterday, the shouty half-dressed degenerate wrestling coach pantsed himself on live television for like the eleventy-millionth time. Upgrade to paid ever since that whole “impeaching Joe Biden for imaginary corruption” thing didn’t pan out (pro tip: don’t get conned by Russian spies), Jimmy and his partner in idiocy, Comer Fudd, have been sniffing up the pantleg of a new line of attack: we’re gonna figure out just how old Joe Biden is, and we’re gonna impeach him for that. Jimmy Jord’s star witness for yesterday’s hearing was MAGA stooge Robert Hur, the former Special Counsel who, it must be stressed, had exonerated Biden for that whole Hey DOJ, I Found Some Classified Documents, Come Take Them Back affair. Robert Hur is hot garbage — and a ******* liar — because at the center of this whole JoE bIdEn iS ToO oLd hysteria — a twenty-megaton panic attack that kept the Ezra Kleins of the world running around with their hair on fire for a solid ******* month — has been Hur’s allegation that Biden is quote-unquote “an elderly man with a poor memory” who couldn’t remember when his son Beau died. and guess what — that was a ******* lie. Hur made the whole thing up. yesterday morning, just before the hearing started, the Washington Post published the transcript of Hur’s five-hour-long interview with Biden — and oh, look: here’s Biden’s actual answer to the question: “What month did Beau die? Oh God, May 30.” got that? Hur lied. which, by the way, raises the question: why the **** did Merrick Garland sit on the interview transcript for a solid month before releasing it? he could have put it out the same day as the report, and saved us all weeks of teeth-gnashing and garment-rending. I keep trying to give Garland the benefit of the doubt, but seriously, he keeps making these errors of judgment. what the hell, Merrick? oh, and check this out: “you appear to have a photographic understanding and recall.” that is verbatim what Hur said to Biden — and during yesterday’s hearing, Eric Swalwell pressed Hur on that point. Swalwell: “I now want to turn you the transcript and day one, page 47. you said to President Biden, ‘you have … appear to have a photographic understanding and recall of the House.’ did you say that to President Biden?” Hur: “[long pause] those words do appear on page 47 of the transcript.” Swalwell: “‘photographic’ is what you said, is that right?” Hur: “that word does appear on page 47 of the transcript.” Swalwell: “never appeared in your report, though, is that correct? the word ‘photographic’?” Hur: “it does not appear in my report.” what a slimy little shitweasel Hur is. he never actually admits to saying what he obviously said. he just agrees that it’s in the transcript — like it just magically appeared there. yeah, maybe that’s what it says in the transcript, but look over there — space aliens! Democrats used Hur for a chew toy and it was glorious to behold. Madeleine Dean: “I want to give you a chance, since the transcript is out, to correct the record on an important point. very sadly, your report on page 208 says that Mr. Biden couldn’t come up with the date, the year, of his son Beau Biden’s death, when in fact in the transcript that you asked him the month, and do you know what he said, Mr. Hur? he said ‘oh god, May 30th.’ would you like to correct the record? his memory was pretty firm on the month and the day.” Hur: “congresswoman, I don’t believe that’s correct in respect to the transcript. but if you could refer me to a specific page, I’d be happy to look.” Dean: “to clarify for you, sir, Mr. Hur, from the transcription, page 82. the words are President Biden’s. ‘what month did Beau die? oh god, May 30th.’” Hur ‘doesn’t believe that’s correct’? look at him flip through his copy of the transcript, totally bewildered to find his own words staring him back in the face. how could this have happened? did Democrats use the hearing to contrast the difference between Biden and Trump? you ******* well bet they did. bring it, Ted Lieu: Lieu: “here’s my first question. in your investigation, did you find that President Biden directed his lawyer to lie to the FBI?” Hur: “we identified no such evidence.” Lieu: “did you find that President Biden directed his lawyer to destroy classified documents?” Hur: “nope.” Lieu: “did you find that President Biden directed his personal assistant to move boxes of documents and hide them from the FBI?” Hur: “no.” Lieu: “did you find that President Biden directed his personal assistant to delete security camera footage, after the FBI asked for that footage?” Hur: “no.” Lieu: “did you find that President Biden showed a classified map related to an ongoing military operation to a campaign aide who did not have clearance.” Hur: no.” Lieu: “did you find that President Biden engaged in a conspiracy to obstruct justice?” Hur: “no.” Lieu: “did you find that President Biden engaged in a scheme to conceal?” Hur: “no.” Lieu: “each of the activities I just laid out describe what Donald Trump did in his willful mishandling of classified information and his criminal efforts to deceive the FBI. in contrast, President Biden handed over documents without delay and complied fully with investigators. Adam Schiff took Hur to the woodshed and beat him like a rented mule. Schiff: “what you did write was deeply prejudicial to the interest of president, and you say it wasn’t political, and yet must have understood — you must have understood the impact of your words. you must have understood the impact of your decision to go beyond the specifics of a particular document to go … to your own prejudicial opinion about the president — one you knew would be amplified by his political opponent. you knew that would influence a political campaign. you had to understand that.” Republicans, for their part, were also hella mad at Hur — for not charging Biden with any crimes. here’s GOP Rep Tom Tiffany: “I want to thank you for the work you did as far as you could, but unfortunately you are part of the praetorian guard that guards that swamp out here in Washington DC, protecting the elites.” yeah, Hur certainly protected the elites, all right — by igniting a month-long feeding frenzy over Sleepy Joe’s imaginary decline. only in Republicanland does that make any ******* sense. and they were pissed off at Merrick Garland, too — for releasing the transcript. “I don’t think it serves this process well for the Justice Department to dump these transcripts into the public right now.” yes, it’s so unfair of Garland to prevent Republicans from being able to lie about Biden’s cognitive acuity — because without lies, the GOP ain’t got s***. boo ******* hoo, crybabies. honestly, the whole hearing could have been an email: Scott Fitzgerald: “Attorney Hur, Webster’s Dictionary defines ‘senile’ as ‘exhibiting a decline of cognitive ability, such as memory associated with old age.’ Mr Hur, based on your report, did you find that the president was senile?” Hur: “I did not.” end of story. the hearing ended not with a bang, but with a whimper. so I guess that’s it for the impeach Joe Biden for being old thing — but don’t worry, it won’t be too long before the Jimmys get a hankering for kicking themselves in the nuts again, and concoct some new cockamamie reason for impeaching Biden. it’s a long way to November, and Dear Leader demands an impeachment, so he can have something to run on besides I don’t want to go to prison. it’s probably too much to ask our worthless corporate-controlled media to stop letting themselves get played by Republican operatives and MAGA stooges like Robert Hur. they could have demanded to see the actual transcripts, insteal of falling all over each other in a mad dash to be the first to report that Sleepy Brandon is senile. Democrats, can we talk? there’s a lesson for you to learn here: this “we’re appointing a Republican to investigate us in order to appear fair” bull**** doesn’t work. it didn’t work when Janet Reno named Robert Fisk and Ken Starr to investigate Bill Clinton. it didn’t work when Barack Obama let James Comey go after the email lady. and it sure as hell did not work when Merrick Garland appointed MAGA operative Robert Hur. for ****’s sake, Hur is the guy wrote the false summary that Bill Barr used to mislead everyone about the Mueller Report. this is the guy you choose to investigate Biden? Republicans will **** you every time. stop giving them the opportunity. notice that Republicans never appoint Democrats to head investigations. why do you think that is? figure it out. everyone is entitled to my own opinion is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Did you find the people's (our) secret documents in a place they should not have found...yes.

Is this in violation 18 U.S. Code § 1924 - Unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents or material...yes

End of story...our documents were stolen...to the thief "your services are not longer needed...you are fired".

Edited March 13 by creed

[aubiefifty 16,873]

47 minutes ago, creed said:

Did you find the people's (our) secret documents in a place they should not have found...yes.

Is this in violation 18 U.S. Code § 1924 - Unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents or material...yes

End of story...our documents were stolen...to the thief "your services are not longer needed...you are fired".

get back  to me when he reaches trump level..................

[creed 1,645]

1 hour ago, aubiefifty said:

get back  to me when he reaches trump level..................

He won't reach Trump levels but that's not my point.

[aubiefifty 16,873]

Just now, creed said:

He won't reach Trump levels but that's not my point.

well no offense but that was all i was interested in.

[DKW 86 7,439]

22 hours ago, creed said:

Did you find the people's (our) secret documents in a place they should not have found...yes.

Is this in violation 18 U.S. Code § 1924 - Unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents or material...yes

End of story...our documents were stolen...to the thief "your services are not longer needed...you are fired".

Classic Whatabaoutism as there ever and it will of course never be called out by one mod or admin here. 

Hey <removed>, go start another thread. 

 

Edited March 14 by DKW 86
no need to escalate this

[auburnatl1 5,006]

For the maga folks let’s use pics and a familiar frame of reference  to explain the difference between what Biden did vs Trump regarding the documents.

Biden

Trump

[aubiefifty 16,873]

5 minutes ago, auburnatl1 said:

For the maga folks let’s use pics and a familiar frame of reference  to explain the difference between what Biden did vs Trump regarding the documents.

Biden

Trump

lets not forget he blabbed top secret details two times lately with foreigners and other folks.