vatz22au 142 Posted February 2, 2006 Share Posted February 2, 2006 Looks like we filled the big gap at WR with a solid #2 ranking in the country for WR recruits!! I'm really excited about this class and I can't wait to see how they contribute in the future. Recruiting Rankings: QB: 16 RB: 28 OL: 21 WR: 2 TE: 15 DT: 2 DE: 13 LB: 24 ATH: 12 Link Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vatz22au 142 Posted February 2, 2006 Author Share Posted February 2, 2006 Here it is compared to bama: Recruiting Rankings: AU Bama QB: #16 #26 RB: #28 #9 OL: #21 #2 WR: #2 #12 TE: #15 #41 DT: #2 Bama did not sign a DT DE: #13 #43 LB: #24 #27 ATH: #12 #11 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DKW 86 7,425 Posted February 2, 2006 Share Posted February 2, 2006 Seems to me that the qb and rb stats are a little subjective there. I would rate our rbs higher and the Bama qbs higher, but that is just me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vatz22au 142 Posted February 2, 2006 Author Share Posted February 2, 2006 Seems to me that the qb and rb stats are a little subjective there. I would rate our rbs higher and the Bama qbs higher, but that is just me. 216957[/snapback] They only signed one 3 star qb....We signed 2 star qb Steven Ensminger and 4 star Neil Caudle. Therefore, the higher ranking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jumbo 0 Posted February 2, 2006 Share Posted February 2, 2006 Bammers inflated ratings come from mike ford and nikita stover signing twice ford is a 5 star and stover a 4 star Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vatz22au 142 Posted February 3, 2006 Author Share Posted February 3, 2006 One more thing I left off: DB: AU #53 (we only signed one I believe) Bama #1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
auskull 239 Posted February 3, 2006 Share Posted February 3, 2006 Look at the DE---How do we rate behind Miami and Louisville? We both signed 3. We have 2 four stars and 1 three star. They both signed 3, 1 four star and 2 three stars. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DKW 86 7,425 Posted February 3, 2006 Share Posted February 3, 2006 Let me better state MHO. I think the Auburn RBs should be higher than they presently are. I think the Bama QBs should be higher than they presently are. I did not mean that they should jump over the other one's ratings, just that these two seem low to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vatz22au 142 Posted February 3, 2006 Author Share Posted February 3, 2006 Let me better state MHO. I think the Auburn RBs should be higher than they presently are. I think the Bama QBs should be higher than they presently are. I did not mean that they should jump over the other one's ratings, just that these two seem low to me. 217379[/snapback] Thats just it...its not bama qbs...its bama "qb." Some of the schools that were recruiting this superstar qb are: Brigham Young, Colorado, North Carolina, Stanford, UNLV, & TCU. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.