AUFAN78

Well, it's obviously on the thread, so it's a comprehension issue. Hard to argue.

Ha! And you sir should try reading.

I've often referred to the "mindless loop of stupidity" related to convos with you homey.

I'm not worried about that which you find at issue here. I responded in kind to poo-flinging remarks.

I'm referring to your intentional failure to read the thread and acknowledge the poo-flinging remarks to which I responded.

That you refuse to read and acknowledge the truth isn't my problem.

Thank you, sir. I must admit, your failure to read makes it easy.

I'm not particularly interested in his excuses fidy.

It is a two-page thread homey. How hard can this possibly be for you? I'll help you further, eliminate page two as it contains only your drivel.

For the record, McLaughlin was raised in Christianity and served as a missionary in college. He was later introduced to drugs and alcohol and became agnostic.

I responded to poo-flinging in kind.

That would require a book. I'm not interested in writing a book. The 316 page Durham Report will suffice. I provided quotes for your convenience. Read them.

I responded to poo. Go back and check.

Those who used them for political purposes.

Incorrect

That was one weird article/interview. I'm not saying this type of stuff isn't happening, but I cannot relate.

They were deceitful lies.

Prototypical oxymoron

I responded to insults and name-calling in kind.

An example of having a spine, not a brain fart. Duncan should pay attention.

It amazes me how quickly the contents of a single thread escape you.

Like New Republic and Salon? Yes, on that we agree.

No homey, it is you already forgot the point made.

4:45 cocktails?

Russian collusion, Crossfire Hurricane, the Steel Dossier. All garbage. After four years, we finally have the full 316-page report from Justice Department special counsel John Durham, and it’s a damning indictment of some of our country’s leading institutions. Durham said the FBI should have never launched an investigation into alleged Russian collusion with Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign, given the slim evidence. urham slammed the FBI’s investigation – dubbed Crossfire Hurricane – into the Trump campaign for its “serious lack of analytic rigor” and a “cavalier attitude” for accuracy. “...We conclude that the Department and the FBI failed to uphold their important mission of strict fidelity to the law in connection with certain events and activities described in this report,” Durham wrote. For its part, the FBI does not dispute the report’s findings, but says it has already taken action and added safeguards in its investigations. Durham also called out the role of the (now-discredited) Steele dossier, the opposition research gathered for the Hillary Clinton campaign that was in turn given to the FBI. Durham said the dossier was “unvetted and unverified,” yet was used as justification for surveillance. “Indeed, based on the evidence gathered in multiple exhaustive and costly federal investigations of these matters, including the instant investigation, neither U.S. law enforcement nor the Intelligence Community appears to have possessed any actual evidence of collusion in their holdings at the commencement of the Crossfire Hurricane investigation," the report stated. As Durham details, the FBI fumbled the “collusion” investigation. But mainstream media outlets also deserve blame for breathlessly going along with the Trump-Russia allegations.