Didba

Hey, I was pretty close! and honestly, it’s probably a good thing it got overturned otherwise it was gonna turn into a shitshow of red states and blue states removing candidates in retaliation. Also, won my first trial as second chair in January. Jury awarded our client a six figure judgment so I’ve been busy getting all that wrapped up.

This is peak Auburn football

Nah, just playing, way more.

Less…

I mean it was a classic example of an earhole

Getting our ass beat by a bunch of backups!

We are a joke

It’s not just our LBers. That’s a positional mismatch for everyone.

Respectfully disagree with that logic. Using new technology in a jury trial, your logic stands for sure but in a football game?

So tired of this team showing up flat. That’s coaching.

Hey, I found a great write-up that explains the whole process that occurred in Colorado from the district level to the Supreme Court: https://www.reddit.com/r/supremecourt/s/1Q0mPkdORa I implore everyone to read it objectively because that forum is extremely tightly moderated and any use of unsubstantiated argument/rhetoric will be removed so it really does have people just objectively explaining what’s going on with these complex topics. I actually consider the forum to be moderate right comparatively to other legal forums on Reddit.

That’s fair, I took your bored comment differently but I see what you meant now. Apologies.

I wasn’t going to hop in on this because I’m just here to talk about the actual court proceedings but the above made me laugh so I had to chime in while talking to a man about a horse. however, don’t be dishonest about being bored. You love this shiz, you love arguing over this stuff with these guys. All of you do on both sides. You are entertained and loving every minute of this adversarial conversation. You wouldn’t be in these threads all the time sparring if you were bored by all of this. I know because I used to be the same way, it doesn’t do anything for me anymore as such I’m rarely in here unless something substantive has happened regarding court proceedings/developments in the law.

It’s not a red/blue thing it’s just appellate courts following the standards of review required for appellate courts. but to answer your question; yes, if a lower court ruled the same exact stuff but against Biden the appellate court reviewing it would be bound by those findings of fact absent evidence of clear error/abuse of discretion by the lower court. my other posts explain it better so you may want to read them if you want a better understanding of standards of review for appellate courts. If you haven’t yet of course.

Also, the standards of review for matters of law vs fact are pretty much the same in every state so what I am talking about isn’t some unique blue state law/circumstance. I would expect the same outcome from the same facts/decisions in any state.