Jump to content

Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew Named in New Jeffrey Epstein Documents


Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, homersapien said:

Pizzagate, QAnon and the ‘Epstein List’: Why the Far Right Is Obsessed with Sex Trafficking

An expert on conspiracy theories explains why MAGA figures are embracing the latest twist in the Jeffrey Epstein saga.

https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2024/01/09/why-maga-is-obsessed-with-jeffrey-epstein-00134394

So Sex trafficking is just not a part of your narrative? 

For the record, I have never said a word about Pizzagate, QAnon etc.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites





On 1/9/2024 at 3:19 PM, DKW 86 said:

I love how you can take the evidence given in courtrooms and documentary TV shows and just dismiss it in a nanosecond because it doesn't fit your narrative.

Blue Maga?

The title to this thread is even misleading. There is no "list" out there.  As an example, the only reason Clinton's name is included in any of the documents is that one woman stated that she heard from another woman that Epstein had told her (the other woman) that Clinton liked young girls.  That isn't even an accusation that Clinton did anything wrong, yet headlines all over the world imply that there is evidence of some kind showing that very thing being released.

The same woman said that she had sex with Bill Richardson, yet she couldn't remember when or what he looked like.  That is the level of credibility assigned to the rumor mill and doesn't come close to being serious allegations.  Richardson denied the allegations.  He died earlier in 2023.  How can anyone defend themselves from a vague rumor?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/10/2024 at 9:50 PM, AU9377 said:

The title to this thread is even misleading. There is no "list" out there.  As an example, the only reason Clinton's name is included in any of the documents is that one woman stated that she heard from another woman that Epstein had told her (the other woman) that Clinton liked young girls.  That isn't even an accusation that Clinton did anything wrong, yet headlines all over the world imply that there is evidence of some kind showing that very thing being released.

The same woman said that she had sex with Bill Richardson, yet she couldn't remember when or what he looked like.  That is the level of credibility assigned to the rumor mill and doesn't come close to being serious allegations.  Richardson denied the allegations.  He died earlier in 2023.  How can anyone defend themselves from a vague rumor?

And 26 trips on the Lolita Express. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/13/2024 at 8:52 AM, homersapien said:

Untitled.thumb.jpg.ddfa65c9e7605071c56c516fb8d4f573.jpg

Except the 26 flights are fact, blue maga.

https://rollcall.com/2016/05/13/report-bill-clinton-flew-on-disgraced-donors-jet-26-times/

You are so disappointing. You will ignore and dodge any fact that doesn't fit your narrative.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...