AU9377 5,109 Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 "Former President Trump lacked any lawful discretionary authority to defy federal criminal law and he is answerable in court for his conduct." They specifically pointed out that if proven, his actions were an “unprecedented assault on the structure of our government.” https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/appeals-court-rejects-trumps-immunity-claim-in-federal-election-interference-case/ar-BB1hRHdE 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NolaAuTiger 3,295 Posted February 7 Share Posted February 7 Obiter dictum anyone? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AU9377 5,109 Posted February 7 Author Share Posted February 7 29 minutes ago, NolaAuTiger said: Obiter dictum anyone? When the other things mentioned include the obvious acts of a former President to undermine our entire electoral system, they are worthy of being mentioned. We have an entire portion of the electorate that would rather adopt a lie than to deal with the truth. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NolaAuTiger 3,295 Posted February 7 Share Posted February 7 9 hours ago, AU9377 said: When the other things mentioned include the obvious acts of a former President to undermine our entire electoral system, they are worthy of being mentioned. We have an entire portion of the electorate that would rather adopt a lie than to deal with the truth. Obiter dictum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
economystupid 25 Posted February 7 Share Posted February 7 1 hour ago, NolaAuTiger said: Obiter dictum. Stop being such a dictum 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoffeeTiger 5,198 Posted February 7 Share Posted February 7 (edited) https://abovethelaw.com/2024/02/maga-lawyer-doesnt-have-a-computer-has-to-borrow-one-from-the-government/ One the lawyers Trump hired doesn't even have a computer of any kind to review court/discovery documents and had to be loaned a computer from the government and has to use them as a resource on how to use it. This lawyer is for the case before judge Cannon though Edited February 7 by CoffeeTiger Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AU9377 5,109 Posted February 7 Author Share Posted February 7 3 hours ago, NolaAuTiger said: Obiter dictum. I understand the Latin. That doesn't discount the discussion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NolaAuTiger 3,295 Posted February 7 Share Posted February 7 5 minutes ago, AU9377 said: I understand the Latin. That doesn't discount the discussion. Yes, yes it does. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now