Unanimous court of appeals slams Trump's actions on January 6th while denying any immunity claim.

[AU9377 5,026]

"Former President Trump lacked any lawful discretionary authority to defy federal criminal law and he is answerable in court for his conduct."

They specifically pointed out that if proven, his actions were  an “unprecedented assault on the structure of our government.”

 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/appeals-court-rejects-trumps-immunity-claim-in-federal-election-interference-case/ar-BB1hRHdE

[NolaAuTiger 3,295]

Obiter dictum anyone?

[AU9377 5,026]

29 minutes ago, NolaAuTiger said:

Obiter dictum anyone?

When the other things mentioned include the obvious acts of a former President to undermine our entire electoral system, they are worthy of being mentioned.  We have an entire portion of the electorate that would rather adopt a lie than to deal with the truth.

[NolaAuTiger 3,295]

9 hours ago, AU9377 said:

When the other things mentioned include the obvious acts of a former President to undermine our entire electoral system, they are worthy of being mentioned.  We have an entire portion of the electorate that would rather adopt a lie than to deal with the truth.

Obiter dictum.

[economystupid 23]

1 hour ago, NolaAuTiger said:

Obiter dictum.

Stop being such a dictum

[CoffeeTiger 5,166]

https://abovethelaw.com/2024/02/maga-lawyer-doesnt-have-a-computer-has-to-borrow-one-from-the-government/

 

One the lawyers Trump hired doesn't even have a computer of any kind to review court/discovery documents and had to be loaned a computer from the government and has to use them as a resource on how to use it. 

 

This lawyer is for the case before  judge Cannon though

Edited February 7 by CoffeeTiger

[AU9377 5,026]

3 hours ago, NolaAuTiger said:

Obiter dictum.

I understand the Latin. That doesn't discount the discussion.

[NolaAuTiger 3,295]

5 minutes ago, AU9377 said:

I understand the Latin. That doesn't discount the discussion.

Yes, yes it does.