TexasTiger 13,017 Posted November 21, 2006 Share Posted November 21, 2006 November 2006: "President Bush said Monday that he has made no decisions about altering the number of U.S. troops in Iraq, and he refused to discuss the pros and cons that would accompany such a decision." August 2005: President Bush said Thursday no decision has been made on increasing or decreasing U.S. troop levels in Iraq, saying that as "Iraqis stand up, we will stand down" and that only conditions on the ground will dictate when it is time for a reduction in U.S. forces. April 2004: "Gen. John P. Abizaid, the senior commander in the Middle East, has asked for contingency plans for increasing the number of troops in Iraq. No decision has been made to supplement the 134,000 troops now there, and White House officials said it was unclear whether such a move would help the situation." November 2003: "The President is going to do what is most effective in Iraq, and he gets recommendations from his commanders on troop levels and what is needed. No decisions have been made about future troops levels," said National Security Advisor Condoleeza Rice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rexbo 104 Posted November 21, 2006 Share Posted November 21, 2006 How about this one? U.S. Considers Large, Temporary Troop Increase in Iraq Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TexasTiger 13,017 Posted November 21, 2006 Author Share Posted November 21, 2006 How about this one? U.S. Considers Large, Temporary Troop Increase in Iraq "Considers"...they've been considering for years, right? Make a decision. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TexasTiger 13,017 Posted November 26, 2006 Author Share Posted November 26, 2006 How about this one? U.S. Considers Large, Temporary Troop Increase in Iraq "Considers"...they've been considering for years, right? Make a decision. While Bush continues to not be "the decider" he claims to be, Iraq continues to collapse. And Afghanistan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bottomfeeder 244 Posted November 26, 2006 Share Posted November 26, 2006 Iran is the problem. Syria, all the way to Damascus, is a region of religious zealots who wish ill against the government of the United States of America. Not as much the people of the US, just the government and their foreign policies, which includes the presence of US troops in Arab countries and support for Israel. The real porblem lies with having too many troops in Iraq, setting us up for heavy losses in our military ranks. Iran could effectively wipe out our military forces in Iraq with little or no effort. That's the highest risk of having too many troops in Iraq at one time. Our forefathers warned against entanglements of foreign lands, and this includes more than just Britain. Russia delivering Tor-M1 rockets to Iran Saturday, November 25, 2006 - ©2005 IranMania.com LONDON, November 25 (IranMania) - Russia has begun deliveries of the Tor-M1 air defense rocket system to Iran, Russian news agencies quoted military industry sources as saying, in the latest sign of a Russian-US rift over Iran. “Deliveries of the Tor-M1 have begun. The first systems have already been delivered to Tehran,“ ITAR-TASS quoted an unnamed, high-ranking source as saying. http://www.iranmania.com/News/ArticleView/...rrent%20Affairs Moscow Moved Weapons to Syria and Lebanon According to a former top Bush administration official, Russian special forces teams moved weapons of mass destruction out of Iraq to Syria. "I am absolutely sure that Russian Spetsnatz units moved WMD out of Iraq before the war," stated John Shaw, the former deputy undersecretary for international technology security. http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2.../2/230625.shtml Iraq is a mess and everyone knows it. The John Wayne approach is good for movies but not reality, as seen in Iraq. Let the boy genius solve his own mess. I'm not participating in martial law if they declare it. I don't agree with what they are doing and wish a change would come before their little experiment gets too far out of hand. Remember, the word "govenment" means "control." There is plenty of crude in the Northern Slope of Alaska, enough to last us at least 200+ years. http://mp3-2.rbnlive.com/Stadt/0406/200406...tadtmiller1.mp3 http://mp3-2.rbnlive.com/Stadt/0406/200406...tadtmiller2.mp3 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jh.../ixopinion.html Poppa Bush talks with Jr. Seriously though, I do have a plan. Only problem is they won't listen and enact the steps of my plan. So, why waste time on 'em? They're hard-headed, just like most people I know. They have all of the answers, but they're all wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bottomfeeder 244 Posted December 3, 2006 Share Posted December 3, 2006 Why Not Invade Vietnam Too? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.