CRuthven 0 Posted May 30, 2010 Share Posted May 30, 2010 i hear ya man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vandelay 5 Posted May 30, 2010 Share Posted May 30, 2010 Liddell / Franklin should not be a main event. Any fight that involves Liddell these days is just another legacy match. He had a good run, but it should be those fighting for a title or a contender for the title who get the spotlight in the main event. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CRuthven 0 Posted May 30, 2010 Share Posted May 30, 2010 well you cant have a title fight every two weeks. its UFC not WWE! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EagleFlight34 101 Posted May 30, 2010 Share Posted May 30, 2010 I said Rashad would win it way back when they were first supposed to fight, and I said it again this time. Rashad had too much speed and Rampage wasn't in good enough shape! Yeah, I agree AA. I have thought they are having too many PPV events too. and $55 for you to order it? They are only $45 for me. What do you have? I have DirectTV. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vandelay 5 Posted May 30, 2010 Share Posted May 30, 2010 well you cant have a title fight every two weeks. its UFC not WWE! Yeah, that's why they need to put on fewer events. They're getting watered down, as someone has already mentioned. Better yet, they need to strike a TV deal with ESPN. They already have one in the UK, as people over there are not accustomed to buying PPV events. I could see them having a lot more "fight night" type of events for exposure if they went to a larger network than Spike or Versus. They are waiting for the perfect TV network contract here in the states. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TAYLORKEETON 794 Posted May 30, 2010 Author Share Posted May 30, 2010 NOW...one more Fight till Carwin and Lesnar! WOOP WOOP!!! :party: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AA 1 Posted May 31, 2010 Share Posted May 31, 2010 I have directv too, but order it in hd. 10 bucks more Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
around4ever 4,139 Posted May 31, 2010 Share Posted May 31, 2010 I have directv too, but order it in hd. 10 bucks more He likes to see the blood in HD. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CRuthven 0 Posted May 31, 2010 Share Posted May 31, 2010 well you cant have a title fight every two weeks. its UFC not WWE! Yeah, that's why they need to put on fewer events. They're getting watered down, as someone has already mentioned. Better yet, they need to strike a TV deal with ESPN. They already have one in the UK, as people over there are not accustomed to buying PPV events. I could see them having a lot more "fight night" type of events for exposure if they went to a larger network than Spike or Versus. They are waiting for the perfect TV network contract here in the states. i hear ya, and i agree. fewer events would make everything about it better! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.