tiger88 934 Posted August 8, 2013 Share Posted August 8, 2013 ......than people who get more than say 5% (I feel like I'm being generous here.) of their post count from +1, +2, etc. type responses to other peoples posts. Nothing wrong with using it occassionally, but come on people. We don't need to be informed that you agree with 30-50% of what you read. Did I mention it clogs threads the hell up with a bunch of what in most cases is spam afa I'm concerned. Jmhfo. (The f is for freaking ) Discuss, or don't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarEagle2 53 Posted August 8, 2013 Share Posted August 8, 2013 ......than people who get more than say 5% (I feel like I'm being generous here.) of their post count from +1, +2, etc. type responses to other peoples posts. Nothing wrong with using it occassionally, but come on people. We don't need to be informed that you agree with 30-50% of what you read. Did I mention it clogs threads the hell up with a bunch of what in most cases is spam afa I'm concerned. Jmhfo. (The f is for freaking :)/> ) Discuss, or don't. +1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tiger88 934 Posted August 8, 2013 Author Share Posted August 8, 2013 ......than people who get more than say 5% (I feel like I'm being generous here.) of their post count from +1, +2, etc. type responses to other peoples posts. Nothing wrong with using it occassionally, but come on people. We don't need to be informed that you agree with 30-50% of what you read. Did I mention it clogs threads the hell up with a bunch of what in most cases is spam afa I'm concerned. Jmhfo. (The f is for freaking :)/> ) Discuss, or don't. +1 ^^^^ This Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BornaTiger 0 Posted August 8, 2013 Share Posted August 8, 2013 Word :/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
waspan 0 Posted August 8, 2013 Share Posted August 8, 2013 Yo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madkat7 233 Posted August 8, 2013 Share Posted August 8, 2013 In the grand scheme of things, does ones post count really matter all that much? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FHeal 4 Posted August 8, 2013 Share Posted August 8, 2013 ......than people who get more than say 5% (I feel like I'm being generous here.) of their post count from +1, +2, etc. type responses to other peoples posts. Nothing wrong with using it occassionally, but come on people. We don't need to be informed that you agree with 30-50% of what you read. Did I mention it clogs threads the hell up with a bunch of what in most cases is spam afa I'm concerned. Jmhfo. (The f is for freaking :)/> ) Discuss, or don't. +1 ^^^^ This ++ (and we surely don't want to clog hell) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kickemintheB3 5 Posted August 8, 2013 Share Posted August 8, 2013 What is the sound of one hand posting? If a post is logged in the woods, is still irrelevant? If you write something here too quickly, is it a post haste? If you are on fire when you write it, is it a post toastie? The room that you're in when you write something here, is that your post office? If you wrote it down and sent it to someone, would that be a post card? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wareagletd 0 Posted August 8, 2013 Share Posted August 8, 2013 What is the sound of one hand posting? If a post is logged in the woods, is still irrelevant? If you write something here too quickly, is it a post haste? If you are on fire when you write it, is it a post toastie? The room that you're in when you write something here, is that your post office? If you wrote it down and sent it to someone, would that be a post card? +1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
graffevj 0 Posted August 8, 2013 Share Posted August 8, 2013 ditto Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUIH1 1,515 Posted August 8, 2013 Share Posted August 8, 2013 OK wde Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gctiger 937 Posted August 8, 2013 Share Posted August 8, 2013 Maybe if new members weren't treared as second class citizens this wouldn't be an issue. i understand the reason but the 100 post requirement may be a bit of overkill. It was supposed to be temporary anyway... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AU_MB_01 1 Posted August 8, 2013 Share Posted August 8, 2013 I agree. You shouldn't reply to a post just to agree with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AU64 10,122 Posted August 8, 2013 Share Posted August 8, 2013 ......than people who get more than say 5% (I feel like I'm being generous here.) of their post count from +1, +2, etc. type responses to other peoples posts. Nothing wrong with using it occassionally, but come on people. We don't need to be informed that you agree with 30-50% of what you read. Did I mention it clogs threads the hell up with a bunch of what in most cases is spam afa I'm concerned. Jmhfo. (The f is for freaking :)/> ) Discuss, or don't. +1 ^^^^ This ++ (and we surely don't want to clog hell) Amen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AU64 10,122 Posted August 8, 2013 Share Posted August 8, 2013 Maybe if new members weren't treared as second class citizens this wouldn't be an issue. i understand the reason but the 100 post requirement may be a bit of overkill. It was supposed to be temporary anyway... I agree ...but you only have 69 to go...keep up the good work. WE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarTiger 3,910 Posted August 8, 2013 Share Posted August 8, 2013 Maybe if new members weren't treared as second class citizens this wouldn't be an issue. i understand the reason but the 100 post requirement may be a bit of overkill. It was supposed to be temporary anyway... The 100 post requirement was temporary just like it was originally intended to be. The requirement is now 50 and has been for months. But, don't let facts get in the way of your argument. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AU64 10,122 Posted August 8, 2013 Share Posted August 8, 2013 Maybe if new members weren't treared as second class citizens this wouldn't be an issue. i understand the reason but the 100 post requirement may be a bit of overkill. It was supposed to be temporary anyway... The 100 post requirement was temporary just like it was originally intended to be. The requirement is now 50 and has been for months. But, don't let facts get in the way of your argument. Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
douggwilliams 61 Posted August 8, 2013 Share Posted August 8, 2013 Maybe if new members weren't treared as second class citizens this wouldn't be an issue. i understand the reason but the 100 post requirement may be a bit of overkill. It was supposed to be temporary anyway... I agree with you, wait, why am I even talking to you, low poster? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scottie 124 Posted August 8, 2013 Share Posted August 8, 2013 Maybe if new members weren't treared as second class citizens this wouldn't be an issue. i understand the reason but the 100 post requirement may be a bit of overkill. It was supposed to be temporary anyway... The 100 post requirement was temporary just like it was originally intended to be. The requirement is now 50 and has been for months. But, don't let facts get in the way of your argument. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REInvestingTiger 2 Posted August 8, 2013 Share Posted August 8, 2013 ......than people who get more than say 5% (I feel like I'm being generous here.) of their post count from +1, +2, etc. type responses to other peoples posts. Nothing wrong with using it occassionally, but come on people. We don't need to be informed that you agree with 30-50% of what you read. Did I mention it clogs threads the hell up with a bunch of what in most cases is spam afa I'm concerned. Jmhfo. (The f is for freaking ) Discuss, or don't. +1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pwauburn 0 Posted August 8, 2013 Share Posted August 8, 2013 ......than people who get more than say 5% (I feel like I'm being generous here.) of their post count from +1, +2, etc. type responses to other peoples posts. Nothing wrong with using it occassionally, but come on people. We don't need to be informed that you agree with 30-50% of what you read. Did I mention it clogs threads the hell up with a bunch of what in most cases is spam afa I'm concerned. Jmhfo. (The f is for freaking :)/> ) Discuss, or don't. +1 One thing that IS more annoying are the people that care about "post count". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
im4au 44 Posted August 8, 2013 Share Posted August 8, 2013 A thread about posting is a great way to get our post counts up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ausburn 159 Posted August 8, 2013 Share Posted August 8, 2013 How many pages does this thread go for before it become annoying? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
br1ay 0 Posted August 8, 2013 Share Posted August 8, 2013 Three Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gctiger 937 Posted August 8, 2013 Share Posted August 8, 2013 Maybe if new members weren't treared as second class citizens this wouldn't be an issue. i understand the reason but the 100 post requirement may be a bit of overkill. It was supposed to be temporary anyway... The 100 post requirement was temporary just like it was originally intended to be. The requirement is now 50 and has been for months. But, don't let facts get in the way of your argument. So I guess I'm supposed to review that thread everyday in order to stay familiar with the post requirement? My daughter when to school with a couple of the players and my wife works with mother of a current player and there have been times when I felt I could have offered some unique insight regarding a new topic but was unable to create one. I find your flame unprofessional and personally offensive. The fact is that the post requirement is a cop out, but like you said yourself, don't let the facts get in the way... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.