homersapien 11,812 Posted June 29, 2016 Share Posted June 29, 2016 http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/senate-zika-funding_us_5772937fe4b0dbb1bbbc00c2?section= Republicans were using the Zika bill to promote the Confederate flag, anti-contraception riders and exceptions to clean water laws. "The GOP bill would pay for the Zika response with $750 million in cuts elsewhere, including taking more than $100 million from the Ebola response, and more than $500 million from an Affordable Care Act fund. It also bars the money from going to contraceptive services for women in Zika-afflicted areas, and to groups such as Planned Parenthood. Zika is most threatening to pregnant women, whose babies can suffer from microcephaly and other irreversible problems while they are in the womb. There are nearly 2,700 people infected with the virus in the United States and its territories, including nearly 500 pregnant women. The GOP version of the bill also eliminates a rule that bars the flying of Confederate flags at veterans’ cemeteries. Further, it waives environmental rules to allow theincreased spraying of pesticides in waterways, although Zika-carrying mosquitoes do not breed in moving rivers and ponds. They prefer stagnant water, such as in old tires, cans or bottle caps." Brilliant! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AURaptor 1,137 Posted June 29, 2016 Share Posted June 29, 2016 This is how things get passed. It's called compromise. You really want something , you give a little. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
homersapien 11,812 Posted June 29, 2016 Author Share Posted June 29, 2016 This is how things get passed. It's called compromise. You really want something , you give a little. Yeah. This is apparently what Republicans want: It also bars the money from going to contraceptive services for women in Zika-afflicted areas, and to groups such as Planned Parenthood. Zika is most threatening to pregnant women, whose babies can suffer from microcephaly and other irreversible problems while they are in the womb. You can't justify that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AURaptor 1,137 Posted June 29, 2016 Share Posted June 29, 2016 Not the proper function of our government to provide condoms to foreign nations, is it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
channonc 466 Posted June 29, 2016 Share Posted June 29, 2016 Not the proper function of our government to provide condoms to foreign nations, is it? Typical. The only contraception Raptor thinks of is for the man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AURaptor 1,137 Posted June 30, 2016 Share Posted June 30, 2016 Not the proper function of our government to provide condoms to foreign nations, is it? Typical. The only contraception Raptor thinks of is for the man. Huh ? What other contraception that stops zika virus is there ? The pill won't do it. Nor will any surgical implant... but hey, do tell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
channonc 466 Posted June 30, 2016 Share Posted June 30, 2016 Not the proper function of our government to provide condoms to foreign nations, is it? Typical. The only contraception Raptor thinks of is for the man. Huh ? What other contraception that stops zika virus is there ? The pill won't do it. Nor will any surgical implant... but hey, do tell. Well, given that Zika is passed by sexual contact and can cause birth defects, you could argue any method that keeps a woman from getting pregnant helps with this epidemic. Zika is treatable, the birth defects are not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AURaptor 1,137 Posted June 30, 2016 Share Posted June 30, 2016 Not the proper function of our government to provide condoms to foreign nations, is it? Typical. The only contraception Raptor thinks of is for the man. Huh ? What other contraception that stops zika virus is there ? The pill won't do it. Nor will any surgical implant... but hey, do tell. Well, given that Zika is passed by sexual contact and can cause birth defects, you could argue any method that keeps a woman from getting pregnant helps with this epidemic. Zika is treatable, the birth defects are not. You didn't answer the question, I see. When it comes right down to it, this is saying people are incapable of thinking on their own, and need the govt to save them not from mosquitoes, but themselves. As a libertarian, I reject that concept. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
homersapien 11,812 Posted June 30, 2016 Author Share Posted June 30, 2016 Not the proper function of our government to provide condoms to foreign nations, is it? Typical. The only contraception Raptor thinks of is for the man. Huh ? What other contraception that stops zika virus is there ? The pill won't do it. Nor will any surgical implant... but hey, do tell. Well, given that Zika is passed by sexual contact and can cause birth defects, you could argue any method that keeps a woman from getting pregnant helps with this epidemic. Zika is treatable, the birth defects are not. You didn't answer the question, I see. When it comes right down to it, this is saying people are incapable of thinking on their own, and need the govt to save them not from mosquitoes, but themselves. As a libertarian, I reject that concept. Yeah, but you know squat about public health. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AURaptor 1,137 Posted June 30, 2016 Share Posted June 30, 2016 Yeah, but you know squat about public health. I know 1.1 billion can buy a hell of a lot of things needed to fight Zika, and whining about 0.8 billion dollars more , which is what Obama wants, is pretty damn petty and arrogant. YOU want to buy condoms for foreigners ? Start up your own campaign and GoFund yourself Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
icanthearyou 4,468 Posted July 2, 2016 Share Posted July 2, 2016 Not the proper function of our government to provide condoms to foreign nations, is it? Typical. The only contraception Raptor thinks of is for the man. Huh ? What other contraception that stops zika virus is there ? The pill won't do it. Nor will any surgical implant... but hey, do tell. Well, given that Zika is passed by sexual contact and can cause birth defects, you could argue any method that keeps a woman from getting pregnant helps with this epidemic. Zika is treatable, the birth defects are not. You didn't answer the question, I see. When it comes right down to it, this is saying people are incapable of thinking on their own, and need the govt to save them not from mosquitoes, but themselves. As a libertarian, I reject that concept. Yeah, but you know squat about public health. "Public Health" is fancy liberal talk for socialism. Be responsible for your own health. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
homersapien 11,812 Posted July 2, 2016 Author Share Posted July 2, 2016 Yeah, but you know squat about public health. I know 1.1 billion can buy a hell of a lot of things needed to fight Zika, and whining about 0.8 billion dollars more , which is what Obama wants, is pretty damn petty and arrogant. YOU want to buy condoms for foreigners ? Start up your own campaign and GoFund yourself Oh you know that huh? :-\ And where exactly did you obtain this expertise in pandemic diseases? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AURaptor 1,137 Posted July 2, 2016 Share Posted July 2, 2016 Yeah, but you know squat about public health. I know 1.1 billion can buy a hell of a lot of things needed to fight Zika, and whining about 0.8 billion dollars more , which is what Obama wants, is pretty damn petty and arrogant. YOU want to buy condoms for foreigners ? Start up your own campaign and GoFund yourself Oh you know that huh? :-\ And where exactly did you obtain this expertise in pandemic diseases? I stayed in a Holiday Inn, of course. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
homersapien 11,812 Posted July 2, 2016 Author Share Posted July 2, 2016 Yeah, what I thought. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AURaptor 1,137 Posted July 2, 2016 Share Posted July 2, 2016 Yeah, what I thought. Facts escape you, it seems. Obama had a bill he could have signed, long ago, which would give 1.1 billion dollars to fight Zika. Because he and the Dems are so hell bent on their own political sacred cows, instead of helping fellow humans and stopping the spread of the virus, they instead chose to let NOTHING pass. Democrats. Politics over country. Politics over common sense. Politics over humanity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
homersapien 11,812 Posted July 2, 2016 Author Share Posted July 2, 2016 Irony. "The GOP bill would pay for the Zika response with $750 million in cuts elsewhere, including taking more than $100 million from the Ebola response, and more than $500 million from an Affordable Care Act fund. It also bars the money from going to contraceptive services for women in Zika-afflicted areas, and to groups such as Planned Parenthood. Zika is most threatening to pregnant women, whose babies can suffer from microcephaly and other irreversible problems while they are in the womb. There are nearly 2,700 people infected with the virus in the United States and its territories, including nearly 500 pregnant women. The GOP version of the bill also eliminates a rule that bars the flying of Confederate flags at veterans’ cemeteries. Further, it waives environmental rules to allow theincreased spraying of pesticides in waterways, although Zika-carrying mosquitoes do not breed in moving rivers and ponds. They prefer stagnant water, such as in old tires, cans or bottle caps. And somehow, this is all the fault of Democrats. :-\ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.