Jump to content

Republicans Are No Longer a Political Party


Recommended Posts

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2024/02/republicans-are-no-longer-political-party/677437/

It’s become yet another subsidiary of Trump Inc.

By David A. Graham

When historians chronicle the end of the Grand Old Party, they may mark 2024 as the turning point. Something called the Republican Party will surely exist for years to come, like a legacy brand subsumed by a competitor, but it appears to be coming to its end as a functional party. Instead, the Republican Party has become just another subsidiary of Donald Trump Inc.

Yesterday, Trump announced his effective takeover of the Republican National Committee, endorsing Michael Whatley, the chair of the North Carolina GOP, as chair; his daughter-in-law, Lara Trump, as co-chair; and one of his top campaign advisers, Chris LaCivita, as chief operating officer. LaCivita will reportedly also remain with the Trump presidential campaign, splitting time. The current chair of the party, Ronna McDaniel, is stepping down because of pressure from Trump.

Officially, these are only recommendations, but they seem nearly certain to become reality. Trump has long held de facto sway over the Republican National Committee, but these moves give him de jure control, too. The reorganization is especially striking because it comes in the midst of what is a moderately competitive presidential primary between Trump and Nikki Haley. Although no one really thinks Haley has much chance at beating Trump, he’s now asserting control over the body that oversees that primary, like a basketball coach appointing one of his assistant coaches as referee.

Trump’s approach is familiar from the way he ran his family business, the Trump Organization, and his White House. He stocks them with ultra-loyalists who will take hits for him and with family members who are questionably qualified. The effect is to efface any organizational identity or institutional structures, to ensure that the only thing that matters, and the only person who decides, is Trump.

The Trump Organization, unusually for a company of its size, was run with a small staff—a few longtime lieutenants, such as Allen Weisselberg, its longtime CFO, and now-estranged fixer Michael Cohen, and then Trump’s children Donald Jr., Eric, and Ivanka. This generation of Trumps has shown no particular genius for real-estate development; two of them were reportedly nearly charged with felonies after the collapse of one high-profile project. When Trump won the presidency, he nominally placed Eric in charge, but revealed his faith in his son’s abilities by continuing to be highly involved.

Meanwhile, in Washington, Trump appointed Ivanka and her husband, Jared Kushner, to senior-adviser roles in the White House, barely skirting anti-nepotism rules for the executive branch, even though neither of them had any experience in government. But Trump erred, in his own view, by failing to appoint sufficiently sycophantic aides to other roles. Too many of his appointees were determined to defend the processes of government and the rule of law, infuriating him. He and his allies have vowed not to make the same mistakes again.

Now Trump is using the same playbook for the RNC. Whatley is a veteran party official, serving as general counsel, but his major selling point in Trump’s eyes is that he is a loyalist and faithfully backed Trump’s bogus claims that the 2020 election was stolen. Lara Trump has been a frequent surrogate for Trump on the campaign trail and television, but she has no experience at the RNC.

Signs of the GOP’s terminal illness have been present for years. Trump began what amounted to a hostile takeover in 2016, breezing through the Republican primary despite the opposition of most of the party establishment, in a demonstration of the weakness of party structures.

Long before he decided to depose her, McDaniel was his own pick for chair. Presidents always exercise great influence over their party committees, but the GOP was particularly supine. In 2020, the RNC didn’t even bother with one of the most fundamental roles of a political party—putting forth a platform. Instead, it resolved “that the Republican Party has and will continue to enthusiastically support the President’s America-first agenda.” Opposition to Trump within Congress and in state parties has also been slowly suffocated.

The full conquest of the RNC is good news for Trump personally. He can take advantage of the party’s resources, such as they still exist, and make it do what he wants, without the pesky problems of existing structures. But given what we know about the Trump Organization and the Trump White House, it is unlikely to be good news for the party.

In Manhattan this week, a judge is expected to rule in a civil fraud trial that could fine Trump hundreds of millions of dollars, cancel the Trump Organization’s license to operate in New York State, and strip it of marquee properties. Weisselberg is reportedly in talks to plead guilty to perjury in the case, atop a prior felony guilty plea. The Trump administration was, if anything, worse run. It was four years of constant chaos, punctuated by two separate impeachments and concluding with an attempt to steal a presidential election. (Trump is in court over that, too.) None of this is a good omen for the RNC’s future as a Trump subsidiary.

 

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites





And like everything else he touches, it will fail.

Just funny to me how so many people, go gaga and will vote for a fella that has more bankruptcies than the average bear, and can't, or won't pay his bills.

 

  • Like 1
  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fair article. The only thing I’d challenge is that it’s less about trump and more about a tribal leader. If trump looses this year he becomes irrelevant. However the monarchy mentality will remain. There’ll be a new guy that survives the game of thrones process and whacks all rivals. Ultimately, maga is like a non denominational church - its ideology comes solely from the evangelical pastor, not the church (rnc) itself. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Side note: the party of Lincoln and later Reagan eroded first with the tea party and then completely with maga. Not just ideologically but it’s entire personality. Regardless of anyone’s politics - most will accept that Reagan believed any problem was solvable and the US’s best days were ahead. An optimist.

Starting around 2010 (mostly as a reaction to Obama’s progressivism but also to bush’s misuse of the military) “conservatism” got visibly more cynical, agitated, and angry. A “them” culture. Scare the hell out of you / people who think differently than you are evil.  And fixated on party loyalty. Additionally Trump allowed in and wouldn’t disavow the alt right factions (ie kkk) that leaders like McCain and Romney had always rejected earlier. Those factions might be nuts - but damn they’re loyal and vote like friggin banshee’s. These elements had always existed but trump gave them a home. Case in point. Look at McCain in 2008.


That was just 16 years ago and look at the gop’s reaction then. Trump changed that, embraced any and all factions, and they flooded in - and many historical republicans (ie george will) abandoned the party. Meanwhile existing Republican politicians  either changed their principles and kissed the ring (ie graham) or were purged (Cheney and Romney). Ie:

Which is why when someone says they’re a conservative today, I have no idea what they mean.
 

 

Edited by auburnatl1
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/13/2024 at 4:30 PM, auburnatl1 said:

Fair article. The only thing I’d challenge is that it’s less about trump and more about a tribal leader. If trump looses this year he becomes irrelevant. However the monarchy mentality will remain. There’ll be a new guy that survives the game of thrones process and whacks all rivals. Ultimately, maga is like a non denominational church - its ideology comes solely from the evangelical pastor, not the church (rnc) itself. 

That is a brilliant analogy.  One I will use again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...