SEC coaches don't think much of Tide's talent

[BamaGrad03 0]

I already explained what was revisionist about it. Not ONCE in four years has Bama possessed the ball in the 4th QTR with a chance to take the lead. Smoke on that a while and tell me we haven't thouroughly TROUNCED the tide year-in and year-out for four years. Don't give me the "4-7 5 points" argument. Its tired and its lame. It has NO indication of how BADLY Bama was destroyed that night. Face it Bama has been CRUSHED four years running. Auburn hasn't squeaked by once.

Not to nitpick...but in 2003 Alabama had the ball down 21-16 in the 4th Quarter. They had two possessions in that quarter before AU scored.

You say you crushed us...and i see that starting the 4th quarter in 2003 the score was 21-16...in 2004 it was 14-6. Man you hit the nail on the head. Id REALLY say it was a whuppin if i was beating a 4-8 team 21-16 and they had the ball in the 4th...TWICE. And then when i have my best team in 110 years of football on the field and UNDEFEATED...the fact that we were up 14-6 to start the 4th tells me that ...man oh man we are whuppin their butts!

[AWK 0]

I already explained what was revisionist about it. Not ONCE in four years has Bama possessed the ball in the 4th QTR with a chance to take the lead. Smoke on that a while and tell me we haven't thouroughly TROUNCED the tide year-in and year-out for four years. Don't give me the "4-7 5 points" argument. Its tired and its lame. It has NO indication of how BADLY Bama was destroyed that night. Face it Bama has been CRUSHED four years running. Auburn hasn't squeaked by once.

Not to nitpick...but in 2003 Alabama had the ball down 21-16 in the 4th Quarter. They had two possessions in that quarter before AU scored.

You say you crushed us...and i see that starting the 4th quarter in 2003 the score was 21-16...in 2004 it was 14-6. Man you hit the nail on the head. Id REALLY say it was a whuppin if i was beating a 4-8 team 21-16 and they had the ball in the 4th...TWICE. And then when i have my best team in 110 years of football on the field and UNDEFEATED...the fact that we were up 14-6 to start the 4th tells me that ...man oh man we are whuppin their butts!

251484[/snapback]

Isn't this a quote from you......From this thread?

We beat a UT team who was more talented, deeper, and with supposedly better coaching...but the biggest thing was that it was a huge rivalry game. Again, you cant take credit for beating a 4-7 bama team in 04 without giving some for the UT game.

[JohnDeere 0]

I already explained what was revisionist about it. Not ONCE in four years has Bama possessed the ball in the 4th QTR with a chance to take the lead. Smoke on that a while and tell me we haven't thouroughly TROUNCED the tide year-in and year-out for four years. Don't give me the "4-7 5 points" argument. Its tired and its lame. It has NO indication of how BADLY Bama was destroyed that night. Face it Bama has been CRUSHED four years running. Auburn hasn't squeaked by once.

Not to nitpick...but in 2003 Alabama had the ball down 21-16 in the 4th Quarter. They had two possessions in that quarter before AU scored.

You say you crushed us...and i see that starting the 4th quarter in 2003 the score was 21-16...in 2004 it was 14-6. Man you hit the nail on the head. Id REALLY say it was a whuppin if i was beating a 4-8 team 21-16 and they had the ball in the 4th...TWICE. And then when i have my best team in 110 years of football on the field and UNDEFEATED...the fact that we were up 14-6 to start the 4th tells me that ...man oh man we are whuppin their butts!

251484[/snapback]

I was going to reply, but whatever.

It would be like trying to explaining Cal 2 to a 1st grader.

[WinCrimson 61]

I already explained what was revisionist about it. Not ONCE in four years has Bama possessed the ball in the 4th QTR with a chance to take the lead. Smoke on that a while and tell me we haven't thouroughly TROUNCED the tide year-in and year-out for four years. Don't give me the "4-7 5 points" argument. Its tired and its lame. It has NO indication of how BADLY Bama was destroyed that night. Face it Bama has been CRUSHED four years running. Auburn hasn't squeaked by once.

Not to nitpick...but in 2003 Alabama had the ball down 21-16 in the 4th Quarter. They had two possessions in that quarter before AU scored.

You say you crushed us...and i see that starting the 4th quarter in 2003 the score was 21-16...in 2004 it was 14-6. Man you hit the nail on the head. Id REALLY say it was a whuppin if i was beating a 4-8 team 21-16 and they had the ball in the 4th...TWICE. And then when i have my best team in 110 years of football on the field and UNDEFEATED...the fact that we were up 14-6 to start the 4th tells me that ...man oh man we are whuppin their butts!

251484[/snapback]

Isn't this a quote from you......From this thread?

We beat a UT team who was more talented, deeper, and with supposedly better coaching...but the biggest thing was that it was a huge rivalry game. Again, you cant take credit for beating a 4-7 bama team in 04 without giving some for the UT game.

251486[/snapback]

And?? He never said we whipped or "CRUSHED" UT. There in lies the difference.

[wesfau 0]

Jeez, you bama boys have got some sand in your panties today.

Take tonight and watch a movie or play some cards, but do NOT talk football. I'm afraid you cats might suffer a stroke otherwise.

[ValleyTiger 2,894]

I was going to reply, but whatever.

It would be like trying to explaining Cal 2 to a 1st grader.

Mind explaining it to me?

J/k made a lousy B.

[BamaGrad03 0]

AWK,

I said that because some people here were trying to suggest that AU can claim beating a 4-9 bama team by 5 points is a big deal but bama beating UT this year doesnt count because they sucked. Merely trying to suggest that you cant have it both ways.

I was going to reply, but whatever.

It would be like trying to explaining Cal 2 to a 1st grader.

Give it a shot...I passed Cal 1 Cal 2 and Cal 3. Though I was in like...uh 13th grade

[AUloggerhead 2,231]

But you probably shouldn't list U-Thug as one of the bigger games last season... especially after the incredible record they were able to manage.

251300[/snapback]

I don't see any * by the 2 wins over bad Alabama teams in y'alls so highly reguarded 4 win streak/fear the thumb mottos

251370[/snapback]

Why should you? Were any asterisks placed besides the bammies' schedule when your coach at the time was winning nine in a row, especially against Barfield when he was on probation for two of those years? If you weren't alive then I'll understand. If you were alive you know dang well the bammies were crowing about the victories with no thought of any "asterisks" at the time.

I'd tell you to sack up but first you have to prove you have a sack. Get OVER the probation thing, will you please? Gawd.

[AUloggerhead 2,231]

I don't see any * by the 2 wins over bad Alabama teams in y'alls so highly reguarded 4 win streak/fear the thumb mottos

Thank you...thats what ive been saying forever.

251373[/snapback]

Really -- you've been saying this forever? Refresh my memory there, BG: when you were "bamastudent" on the old WEN board, didn't you use to have in your sig something along the lines of:

I'm proud to have been at uat when we owned AU, beating them 3 of the last 4 years.

One of those years was 1999 when uat was the SEC champ & AU had a 1st year HC by the name of Tommy Tuberville who struggled to a 5-6 season ... Like you are so fond of saying, BG: you can't have it both ways. Karma is a byotch.

[DKW 86 7,424]

You say you crushed us...and i see that starting the 4th quarter in 2003 the score was 21-16...in 2004 it was 14-6.

BG We scored 3 straight drives in 2004, The third was just after the fourth started. We were up 21-6 until your last drive got it to 21-13. I dont think you ever touched the ball again. Point being, you only had a chance to TIE, never win.

Stat for you since you guys like talking about moral victories etc.

Taking the last 2 qtrs in 2004 and the first two in 2005, scored 49 points in 4 consecutive qtrs in the Iron Bowl. Kines is a great coach and we give him all the benefit. Things just havent gone right.

[BamaGrad03 0]

BG We scored 3 straight drives in 2004, The third was just after the fourth started. We were up 21-6 until your last drive got it to 21-13. I dont think you ever touched the ball again. Point being, you only had a chance to TIE, never win.

Stat for you since you guys like talking about moral victories etc.

Taking the last 2 qtrs in 2004 and the first two in 2005,  scored 49 points in 4 consecutive qtrs in the Iron Bowl. Kines is a great coach and we give him all the benefit. Things just havent gone right.

Who is talking about moral victories? Im not. Im saying there is NO FREAKING WAY you can discredit our win against UT because they were bad...but then in 2004 play the "rivalry games are always tough and the score is always close...so please let us play in the title game" card.

You cant, in this thread, say "yeah the UT game doesnt matter because they sucked...but we owned your 4-9 butts by 5 whole points in 2003...and i wish my arm was longer so i could pat myself on the back more"

In the last three years...i cant tell you how many times AU fans have had such a huge double standard when it comes to almost EXACT situations that both UA and AU were in. Its amazing.

[GalensGhost 0]

BG We scored 3 straight drives in 2004, The third was just after the fourth started. We were up 21-6 until your last drive got it to 21-13. I dont think you ever touched the ball again. Point being, you only had a chance to TIE, never win.

Stat for you since you guys like talking about moral victories etc.

Taking the last 2 qtrs in 2004 and the first two in 2005,  scored 49 points in 4 consecutive qtrs in the Iron Bowl. Kines is a great coach and we give him all the benefit. Things just havent gone right.

Who is talking about moral victories? Im not. Im saying there is NO FREAKING WAY you can discredit our win against UT because they were bad...but then in 2004 play the "rivalry games are always tough and the score is always close...so please let us play in the title game" card.

You cant, in this thread, say "yeah the UT game doesnt matter because they sucked...but we owned your 4-9 butts by 5 whole points in 2003...and i wish my arm was longer so i could pat myself on the back more"

In the last three years...i cant tell you how many times AU fans have had such a huge double standard when it comes to almost EXACT situations that both UA and AU were in. Its amazing.

251540[/snapback]

BG -

Seriously. Take a break. Go read some of the demented drivel that passes for posts on most Bama-led message boards. Then come back and understand just how much better things are here.

Maybe you're not one of them, but most of the bama fans I read on those boards are complete fools. They mistake history for tradition and somehow manage to calculate future success based on ancient glory.

You know, Alabama won't win one single game -- not one -- over the next 20 years because Steadman Shealy was an option-running monster. And he was. Nice guy on top of that. But it's not going to win you any games this season or next or the next.

I know it's difficult for you when you look at the landscape and see teams you once kept in your back pocket -- Auburn among them -- running out in front and thumbing their noses at you. It's painful to realize that your glory is past. In the 70s, Bama was Muhammed Ali. Undisputed king of the ring. Don't you think when Ali looks in the mirror today he sees the stylish dominating fighter he once was? The mirror lies. And it lies to Bama, too. You were Ali. You ARE Ali. You were the Ali who punched his way to the top and then changed styles to continue an amazing career. You were the Ali who bested all comers. You're the Ali who didn't notice when he lost a step or his hands slowed just a little. You're the Ali that sits dazed in the corner wondering where your teeth went when a kid you would have easily beaten in your prime (Northern Illinios?) used your head for a punching bag. You're Ali, staggering into the ring, throwing a few punches and declaring yourself BACK! You're Ali, sagging to your knees, head foggy unable to understand where these punches are coming from. You're ALI DAMMIT! Don't they know you can't be beaten? You're ALI!! Why aren't they trembling in fear of you? And you're Ali. A shell of his former self. Faltering. Stumbling. Occasionally reminding people that he was once great, while others hold the championships that he once thought his birthright. You're Ali. You're Ole Miss. Get used to it.

[BamaGrad03 0]

You're Ali. You're Ole Miss.

I think it actually bothers you that you are the only one who really believes that.

[GalensGhost 0]

You're Ali. You're Ole Miss.

I think it actually bothers you that you are the only one who really believes that.

251573[/snapback]

I think it bothers you that deep down in the part of your soul you try to hide from the light you know I'm right.

And I'm FAR from the only person who believes it.

[WinCrimson 61]

You're Ali. You're Ole Miss.

I think it actually bothers you that you are the only one who really believes that.

251573[/snapback]

I think it bothers you that deep down in the part of your soul you try to hide from the light you know I'm right.

And I'm FAR from the only person who believes it.

251574[/snapback]

Yeah, the similarities are just striking!! In the past, present, and future... > .

http://nationalchamps.net/NCAA/database/alabama_database.htm

http://nationalchamps.net/NCAA/database/mi...pi_database.htm

40-7-2 record. That is total ownership.

Date    Opponent (record)  Result  Score  Site

10/15/2005 @ *Mississippi (3-8) W 13 10

9/11/2004 vs. *Mississippi (4-7) W 28 7

10/18/2003 @ *Mississippi (10-3) L 28 43

10/19/2002 vs. *Mississippi (7-6) W 42 7

10/13/2001 @ *Mississippi (7-4) L 24 27

10/14/2000 vs. *Mississippi (7-5) W 45 7

10/16/1999 @ *Mississippi (8-4) W 30 24

10/10/1998 vs. *Mississippi (7-5) W 20 17

10/25/1997 @ *Mississippi (8-4) W 29 20

10/19/1996 vs. *Mississippi (5-6) W 37 0

10/21/1995 @ *Mississippi (6-5) W 23 9

10/22/1994 vs. *Mississippi (4-7) W 21 10

10/23/1993 @ *Mississippi (5-6) W 19 14

10/24/1992 vs. *Mississippi (9-3) W 31 10

10/7/1989 vs. *Mississippi (8-4) W 62 27 @ Jackson, MS

10/8/1988 vs. *Mississippi (5-6) L 12 22

9/17/1983 vs. *Mississippi (6-6) W 40 0

9/18/1982 vs. *Mississippi (4-7) W 42 14 @ Jackson, MS

10/3/1981 vs. *Mississippi (4-6-1) W 38 7

9/20/1980 vs. *Mississippi (3-8) W 59 35 @ Jackson, MS

9/10/1977 vs. *Mississippi (5-6) W 34 13 @ Birmingham, AL

9/11/1976 vs. *Mississippi (5-6) L 7 10 @ Jackson, MS

10/4/1975 vs. *Mississippi (6-5) W 32 6 @ Birmingham, AL

10/5/1974 vs. *Mississippi (3-8) W 35 21 @ Jackson, MS

10/2/1971 vs. *Mississippi (10-2) W 40 6 @ Birmingham, AL

10/3/1970 vs. *Mississippi (7-4) L 23 48 @ Jackson, MS

10/4/1969 vs. *Mississippi (8-3) W 33 32 @ Birmingham, AL

10/5/1968 vs. *Mississippi (7-3-1) L 8 10 @ Jackson, MS

10/7/1967 vs. *Mississippi (6-4-1) W 21 7 @ Birmingham, AL

10/1/1966 vs. *Mississippi (8-3) W 17 7 @ Jackson, MS

10/2/1965 vs. *Mississippi (7-4) W 17 16 @ Birmingham, AL

1/1/1964 vs. *Mississippi (7-1-2) W 12 7 @ New Orleans, LA Sugar Bowl

11/11/1944 vs. *Mississippi (2-6) W 34 6 @ Mobile, AL

10/7/1933 vs. *Mississippi (6-3-2) T 0 0 @ Birmingham, AL

10/22/1932 vs. *Mississippi (5-6) W 24 13

10/3/1931 vs. *Mississippi (2-6-1) W 55 6

10/4/1930 vs. *Mississippi (3-5-1) W 64 0

10/5/1929 vs. *Mississippi (1-6-2) W 22 7

10/6/1928 vs. *Mississippi (5-4) W 27 0

11/1/1924 vs. *Mississippi (4-5) W 61 0 @ Montgomery, AL

10/6/1923 vs. *Mississippi (4-6) W 56 0

10/11/1919 vs. Mississippi (4-4) W 49 0

10/27/1917 vs. Mississippi (1-4-1) W 64 0

10/28/1916 vs. Mississippi (3-6) W 27 0

11/25/1915 vs. Mississippi (2-6) W 53 0 @ Birmingham, AL

11/9/1912 vs. Mississippi (4-3) W 10 9

11/5/1910 vs. Mississippi (7-1) L 0 16 @ Greenville, MS

10/23/1909 vs. Mississippi (4-3-2) T 0 0 @ Jackson, MS

10/12/1907 vs. Mississippi (0-6) W 20 0 @ Columbus, MS

[smokies 0]

has more SEC Football Titles than , which is more than can say.

[AUloggerhead 2,231]

  has more SEC Football Titles than    , which is more than   can say. 

251603[/snapback]

If that were relevent ... uh, OK.

In recent times (i.e. this century/last 5 years,) uat has more wins against Ole Miss than losses: 3-2. Maybe this year Ole Miss evens that up and proves to you bammies once & for all that they are your contemporary equal?

[GalensGhost 0]

You're Ali. You're Ole Miss.

I think it actually bothers you that you are the only one who really believes that.

251573[/snapback]

I think it bothers you that deep down in the part of your soul you try to hide from the light you know I'm right.

And I'm FAR from the only person who believes it.

251574[/snapback]

Yeah, the similarities are just striking!! In the past, present, and future... > .

http://nationalchamps.net/NCAA/database/alabama_database.htm

http://nationalchamps.net/NCAA/database/mi...pi_database.htm

40-7-2 record. That is total ownership.

Date     Opponent (record)  Result  Score  Site

10/15/2005 @ *Mississippi (3-8) W 13 10

9/11/2004 vs. *Mississippi (4-7) W 28 7

10/18/2003 @ *Mississippi (10-3) L 28 43

10/19/2002 vs. *Mississippi (7-6) W 42 7

10/13/2001 @ *Mississippi (7-4) L 24 27

10/14/2000 vs. *Mississippi (7-5) W 45 7

10/16/1999 @ *Mississippi (8-4) W 30 24

10/10/1998 vs. *Mississippi (7-5) W 20 17

10/25/1997 @ *Mississippi (8-4) W 29 20

10/19/1996 vs. *Mississippi (5-6) W 37 0

10/21/1995 @ *Mississippi (6-5) W 23 9

10/22/1994 vs. *Mississippi (4-7) W 21 10

10/23/1993 @ *Mississippi (5-6) W 19 14

10/24/1992 vs. *Mississippi (9-3) W 31 10

10/7/1989 vs. *Mississippi (8-4) W 62 27 @ Jackson, MS

10/8/1988 vs. *Mississippi (5-6) L 12 22

9/17/1983 vs. *Mississippi (6-6) W 40 0

9/18/1982 vs. *Mississippi (4-7) W 42 14 @ Jackson, MS

10/3/1981 vs. *Mississippi (4-6-1) W 38 7

9/20/1980 vs. *Mississippi (3-8) W 59 35 @ Jackson, MS

9/10/1977 vs. *Mississippi (5-6) W 34 13 @ Birmingham, AL

9/11/1976 vs. *Mississippi (5-6) L 7 10 @ Jackson, MS

10/4/1975 vs. *Mississippi (6-5) W 32 6 @ Birmingham, AL

10/5/1974 vs. *Mississippi (3-8) W 35 21 @ Jackson, MS

10/2/1971 vs. *Mississippi (10-2) W 40 6 @ Birmingham, AL

10/3/1970 vs. *Mississippi (7-4) L 23 48 @ Jackson, MS

10/4/1969 vs. *Mississippi (8-3) W 33 32 @ Birmingham, AL

10/5/1968 vs. *Mississippi (7-3-1) L 8 10 @ Jackson, MS

10/7/1967 vs. *Mississippi (6-4-1) W 21 7 @ Birmingham, AL

10/1/1966 vs. *Mississippi (8-3) W 17 7 @ Jackson, MS

10/2/1965 vs. *Mississippi (7-4) W 17 16 @ Birmingham, AL

1/1/1964 vs. *Mississippi (7-1-2) W 12 7 @ New Orleans, LA Sugar Bowl

11/11/1944 vs. *Mississippi (2-6) W 34 6 @ Mobile, AL

10/7/1933 vs. *Mississippi (6-3-2) T 0 0 @ Birmingham, AL

10/22/1932 vs. *Mississippi (5-6) W 24 13

10/3/1931 vs. *Mississippi (2-6-1) W 55 6

10/4/1930 vs. *Mississippi (3-5-1) W 64 0

10/5/1929 vs. *Mississippi (1-6-2) W 22 7

10/6/1928 vs. *Mississippi (5-4) W 27 0

11/1/1924 vs. *Mississippi (4-5) W 61 0 @ Montgomery, AL

10/6/1923 vs. *Mississippi (4-6) W 56 0

10/11/1919 vs. Mississippi (4-4) W 49 0

10/27/1917 vs. Mississippi (1-4-1) W 64 0

10/28/1916 vs. Mississippi (3-6) W 27 0

11/25/1915 vs. Mississippi (2-6) W 53 0 @ Birmingham, AL

11/9/1912 vs. Mississippi (4-3) W 10 9

11/5/1910 vs. Mississippi (7-1) L 0 16 @ Greenville, MS

10/23/1909 vs. Mississippi (4-3-2) T 0 0 @ Jackson, MS

10/12/1907 vs. Mississippi (0-6) W 20 0 @ Columbus, MS

251587[/snapback]

Do I need to sign it for you? Braille? Audio?

How Alabama has fared against Ole Miss has nothing to do with Bama BECOMING Ole Miss.

Your program today stands where theirs did 25 years ago. They were good in the 50s and 60s (allegedly, that is. No one I know remembers them being great, but they claim three bogus NCs during that span...sound familiar?). Could you have told an Ole Miss fan in 1979 that we'd get to 2006 and they'd still be looking for their "next" SEC title? Sure couldn't have. It was just a matter of time until Ole Miss was "back". Heck fire, they had been "national champions" just a few short years ago and had lots of "truDISHun" Will Bama sink into the same abyss? The fall may not be quite as precipitous but it's still coming. It's happening right in front of your eyes. One "good season" and three or four bad ones. Hey, that's the Ole Miss way. And as the trend slowly spirals downward, the definition of "good" becomes more and more watered down. That's been the trend for a good while and it has nothing to do with probation. It has to do with the current and future state of being Alabama. Keep harking back to days that get further and further away. It's what Ole Miss does. You say they suck and they retaliate with Archie Manning. You guys retaliate with Joe Namath. Too bad he doesn't have any sons.

[WinCrimson 61]

You're Ali. You're Ole Miss.

I think it actually bothers you that you are the only one who really believes that.

251573[/snapback]

I think it bothers you that deep down in the part of your soul you try to hide from the light you know I'm right.

And I'm FAR from the only person who believes it.

251574[/snapback]

Yeah, the similarities are just striking!! In the past, present, and future... > .

http://nationalchamps.net/NCAA/database/alabama_database.htm

http://nationalchamps.net/NCAA/database/mi...pi_database.htm

40-7-2 record. That is total ownership.

Date    Opponent (record)  Result  Score  Site

10/15/2005 @ *Mississippi (3-8) W 13 10

9/11/2004 vs. *Mississippi (4-7) W 28 7

10/18/2003 @ *Mississippi (10-3) L 28 43

10/19/2002 vs. *Mississippi (7-6) W 42 7

10/13/2001 @ *Mississippi (7-4) L 24 27

10/14/2000 vs. *Mississippi (7-5) W 45 7

10/16/1999 @ *Mississippi (8-4) W 30 24

10/10/1998 vs. *Mississippi (7-5) W 20 17

10/25/1997 @ *Mississippi (8-4) W 29 20

10/19/1996 vs. *Mississippi (5-6) W 37 0

10/21/1995 @ *Mississippi (6-5) W 23 9

10/22/1994 vs. *Mississippi (4-7) W 21 10

10/23/1993 @ *Mississippi (5-6) W 19 14

10/24/1992 vs. *Mississippi (9-3) W 31 10

10/7/1989 vs. *Mississippi (8-4) W 62 27 @ Jackson, MS

10/8/1988 vs. *Mississippi (5-6) L 12 22

9/17/1983 vs. *Mississippi (6-6) W 40 0

9/18/1982 vs. *Mississippi (4-7) W 42 14 @ Jackson, MS

10/3/1981 vs. *Mississippi (4-6-1) W 38 7

9/20/1980 vs. *Mississippi (3-8) W 59 35 @ Jackson, MS

9/10/1977 vs. *Mississippi (5-6) W 34 13 @ Birmingham, AL

9/11/1976 vs. *Mississippi (5-6) L 7 10 @ Jackson, MS

10/4/1975 vs. *Mississippi (6-5) W 32 6 @ Birmingham, AL

10/5/1974 vs. *Mississippi (3-8) W 35 21 @ Jackson, MS

10/2/1971 vs. *Mississippi (10-2) W 40 6 @ Birmingham, AL

10/3/1970 vs. *Mississippi (7-4) L 23 48 @ Jackson, MS

10/4/1969 vs. *Mississippi (8-3) W 33 32 @ Birmingham, AL

10/5/1968 vs. *Mississippi (7-3-1) L 8 10 @ Jackson, MS

10/7/1967 vs. *Mississippi (6-4-1) W 21 7 @ Birmingham, AL

10/1/1966 vs. *Mississippi (8-3) W 17 7 @ Jackson, MS

10/2/1965 vs. *Mississippi (7-4) W 17 16 @ Birmingham, AL

1/1/1964 vs. *Mississippi (7-1-2) W 12 7 @ New Orleans, LA Sugar Bowl

11/11/1944 vs. *Mississippi (2-6) W 34 6 @ Mobile, AL

10/7/1933 vs. *Mississippi (6-3-2) T 0 0 @ Birmingham, AL

10/22/1932 vs. *Mississippi (5-6) W 24 13

10/3/1931 vs. *Mississippi (2-6-1) W 55 6

10/4/1930 vs. *Mississippi (3-5-1) W 64 0

10/5/1929 vs. *Mississippi (1-6-2) W 22 7

10/6/1928 vs. *Mississippi (5-4) W 27 0

11/1/1924 vs. *Mississippi (4-5) W 61 0 @ Montgomery, AL

10/6/1923 vs. *Mississippi (4-6) W 56 0

10/11/1919 vs. Mississippi (4-4) W 49 0

10/27/1917 vs. Mississippi (1-4-1) W 64 0

10/28/1916 vs. Mississippi (3-6) W 27 0

11/25/1915 vs. Mississippi (2-6) W 53 0 @ Birmingham, AL

11/9/1912 vs. Mississippi (4-3) W 10 9

11/5/1910 vs. Mississippi (7-1) L 0 16 @ Greenville, MS

10/23/1909 vs. Mississippi (4-3-2) T 0 0 @ Jackson, MS

10/12/1907 vs. Mississippi (0-6) W 20 0 @ Columbus, MS

251587[/snapback]

Do I need to sign it for you? Braille? Audio?

How Alabama has fared against Ole Miss has nothing to do with Bama BECOMING Ole Miss.

Your program today stands where theirs did 25 years ago. They were good in the 50s and 60s (allegedly, that is. No one I know remembers them being great, but they claim three bogus NCs during that span...sound familiar?). Could you have told an Ole Miss fan in 1979 that we'd get to 2006 and they'd still be looking for their "next" SEC title? Sure couldn't have. It was just a matter of time until Ole Miss was "back". Heck fire, they had been "national champions" just a few short years ago and had lots of "truDISHun" Will Bama sink into the same abyss? The fall may not be quite as precipitous but it's still coming. It's happening right in front of your eyes. One "good season" and three or four bad ones. Hey, that's the Ole Miss way. And as the trend slowly spirals downward, the definition of "good" becomes more and more watered down. That's been the trend for a good while and it has nothing to do with probation. It has to do with the current and future state of being Alabama. Keep harking back to days that get further and further away. It's what Ole Miss does. You say they suck and they retaliate with Archie Manning. You guys retaliate with Joe Namath. Too bad he doesn't have any sons.

251617[/snapback]

Q: How do you say "tradition?" Just wondrin'... since 99.99% of people are going to pronounce it "tradishun." I really don't get your point there.

And thank God Joe Namath doesn't have a son, his daughter is absolutely beautiful and attends UA.

[Proud Tiger 4,261]

BG We scored 3 straight drives in 2004, The third was just after the fourth started. We were up 21-6 until your last drive got it to 21-13. I dont think you ever touched the ball again. Point being, you only had a chance to TIE, never win.

Stat for you since you guys like talking about moral victories etc.

Taking the last 2 qtrs in 2004 and the first two in 2005,  scored 49 points in 4 consecutive qtrs in the Iron Bowl. Kines is a great coach and we give him all the benefit. Things just havent gone right.

Who is talking about moral victories? Im not. Im saying there is NO FREAKING WAY you can discredit our win against UT because they were bad...but then in 2004 play the "rivalry games are always tough and the score is always close...so please let us play in the title game" card.

You cant, in this thread, say "yeah the UT game doesnt matter because they sucked...but we owned your 4-9 butts by 5 whole points in 2003...and i wish my arm was longer so i could pat myself on the back more"

In the last three years...i cant tell you how many times AU fans have had such a huge double standard when it comes to almost EXACT situations that both UA and AU were in. Its amazing.

251540[/snapback]

BG -

Seriously. Take a break. Go read some of the demented drivel that passes for posts on most Bama-led message boards. Then come back and understand just how much better things are here.

Maybe you're not one of them, but most of the bama fans I read on those boards are complete fools. They mistake history for tradition and somehow manage to calculate future success based on ancient glory.

You know, Alabama won't win one single game -- not one -- over the next 20 years because Steadman Shealy was an option-running monster. And he was. Nice guy on top of that. But it's not going to win you any games this season or next or the next.

I know it's difficult for you when you look at the landscape and see teams you once kept in your back pocket -- Auburn among them -- running out in front and thumbing their noses at you. It's painful to realize that your glory is past. In the 70s, Bama was Muhammed Ali. Undisputed king of the ring. Don't you think when Ali looks in the mirror today he sees the stylish dominating fighter he once was? The mirror lies. And it lies to Bama, too. You were Ali. You ARE Ali. You were the Ali who punched his way to the top and then changed styles to continue an amazing career. You were the Ali who bested all comers. You're the Ali who didn't notice when he lost a step or his hands slowed just a little. You're the Ali that sits dazed in the corner wondering where your teeth went when a kid you would have easily beaten in your prime (Northern Illinios?) used your head for a punching bag. You're Ali, staggering into the ring, throwing a few punches and declaring yourself BACK! You're Ali, sagging to your knees, head foggy unable to understand where these punches are coming from. You're ALI DAMMIT! Don't they know you can't be beaten? You're ALI!! Why aren't they trembling in fear of you? And you're Ali. A shell of his former self. Faltering. Stumbling. Occasionally reminding people that he was once great, while others hold the championships that he once thought his birthright. You're Ali. You're Ole Miss. Get used to it.

251565[/snapback]

Greta post GG. You do have a way with analogies

And sorry BG, you are wrong AGAIN(what's new) but GG is far from the only one who believes it. Want to put up a poll to back your claim? Nah you wouldn't dare do anything that provided proof you are wrong.

[SKCAUB 0]

You're Ali. You're Ole Miss.

I think it actually bothers you that you are the only one who really believes that.

251573[/snapback]

OK...you're Joe Frazier!

[Proud Tiger 4,261]

You're Ali. You're Ole Miss.

I think it actually bothers you that you are the only one who really believes that.

251573[/snapback]

OK...you're Joe Frazier!

251634[/snapback]

Maybe Pete Rose fits better

[WarTim 3,456]

BG We scored 3 straight drives in 2004, The third was just after the fourth started. We were up 21-6 until your last drive got it to 21-13. I dont think you ever touched the ball again. Point being, you only had a chance to TIE, never win.

Stat for you since you guys like talking about moral victories etc.

Taking the last 2 qtrs in 2004 and the first two in 2005,  scored 49 points in 4 consecutive qtrs in the Iron Bowl. Kines is a great coach and we give him all the benefit. Things just havent gone right.

Who is talking about moral victories? Im not. Im saying there is NO FREAKING WAY you can discredit our win against UT because they were bad...but then in 2004 play the "rivalry games are always tough and the score is always close...so please let us play in the title game" card.

You cant, in this thread, say "yeah the UT game doesnt matter because they sucked...but we owned your 4-9 butts by 5 whole points in 2003...and i wish my arm was longer so i could pat myself on the back more"

In the last three years...i cant tell you how many times AU fans have had such a huge double standard when it comes to almost EXACT situations that both UA and AU were in. Its amazing.

251540[/snapback]

BG -

Seriously. Take a break. Go read some of the demented drivel that passes for posts on most Bama-led message boards. Then come back and understand just how much better things are here.

Maybe you're not one of them, but most of the bama fans I read on those boards are complete fools. They mistake history for tradition and somehow manage to calculate future success based on ancient glory.

You know, Alabama won't win one single game -- not one -- over the next 20 years because Steadman Shealy was an option-running monster. And he was. Nice guy on top of that. But it's not going to win you any games this season or next or the next.

I know it's difficult for you when you look at the landscape and see teams you once kept in your back pocket -- Auburn among them -- running out in front and thumbing their noses at you. It's painful to realize that your glory is past. In the 70s, Bama was Muhammed Ali. Undisputed king of the ring. Don't you think when Ali looks in the mirror today he sees the stylish dominating fighter he once was? The mirror lies. And it lies to Bama, too. You were Ali. You ARE Ali. You were the Ali who punched his way to the top and then changed styles to continue an amazing career. You were the Ali who bested all comers. You're the Ali who didn't notice when he lost a step or his hands slowed just a little. You're the Ali that sits dazed in the corner wondering where your teeth went when a kid you would have easily beaten in your prime (Northern Illinios?) used your head for a punching bag. You're Ali, staggering into the ring, throwing a few punches and declaring yourself BACK! You're Ali, sagging to your knees, head foggy unable to understand where these punches are coming from. You're ALI DAMMIT! Don't they know you can't be beaten? You're ALI!! Why aren't they trembling in fear of you? And you're Ali. A shell of his former self. Faltering. Stumbling. Occasionally reminding people that he was once great, while others hold the championships that he once thought his birthright. You're Ali. You're Ole Miss. Get used to it.

251565[/snapback]

Great post Ghost! Alas, it has fallen on deaf ears. They are history. They know it. They simply choose to bury their collective heads in the dark pink sand and think it will all go away. THAT, to me, makes it all the more fun to watch their "future".

Some things will never change. The good old boys in west vance will do what they have always done. That, in the end, will prove to be the death nail. Count on it.

[AURainman 6]

I already explained what was revisionist about it. Not ONCE in four years has Bama possessed the ball in the 4th QTR with a chance to take the lead. Smoke on that a while and tell me we haven't thouroughly TROUNCED the tide year-in and year-out for four years. Don't give me the "4-7 5 points" argument. Its tired and its lame. It has NO indication of how BADLY Bama was destroyed that night. Face it Bama has been CRUSHED four years running. Auburn hasn't squeaked by once.

Not to nitpick...but in 2003 Alabama had the ball down 21-16 in the 4th Quarter. They had two possessions in that quarter before AU scored.

You say you crushed us...and i see that starting the 4th quarter in 2003 the score was 21-16...in 2004 it was 14-6. Man you hit the nail on the head. Id REALLY say it was a whuppin if i was beating a 4-8 team 21-16 and they had the ball in the 4th...TWICE. And then when i have my best team in 110 years of football on the field and UNDEFEATED...the fact that we were up 14-6 to start the 4th tells me that ...man oh man we are whuppin their butts!

251484[/snapback]

Touche' on the nitpicking.

My point was, Bama hasn't even threatened Auburn in FOUR years. Don't puff your chest over two years worth ('03 & '04) of games where Auburn allowed a late, meaningless touchdown. We all know how crushing those games were to Bama.

Same as it ever was... When will you ever learn.

[vatz22au 142]

Frankly... I could care less about how close Bama was or wasn't. A win is a win and I'll glady accept it.