runswithscissors 33 Posted June 27, 2008 Share Posted June 27, 2008 I'm not sure how true this is, but.... Jimmy John's Pit Bull Website was Registered on April 12th, 2006.....Meaning that there's a possibility that he's been ineligible since April 12th, 2006. http://www.networksolutions.com/whois/arin...hnspitbulls.com actually, the site wasn't even registered until 03/06/08 according to the WHOIS from NETSOL http://www.networksolutions.com/whois/resu...hnspitbulls.com Registered through: GoDaddy.com, Inc. (http://www.godaddy.com) Domain Name: JIMMYJOHNSPITBULLS.COM Created on: 06-Mar-08 Expires on: 07-Mar-09 Last Updated on: 06-Mar-08 also on GoDaddy http://who.godaddy.com/WhoIsRegData.aspx?k...prog_id=godaddy Domain Name: JIMMYJOHNSPITBULLS.COM Registrar: GODADDY.COM, INC. Whois Server: whois.godaddy.com Referral URL: http://registrar.godaddy.com Name Server: NS11.DOMAINCONTROL.COM Name Server: NS12.DOMAINCONTROL.COM Status: clientDeleteProhibited Status: clientRenewProhibited Status: clientTransferProhibited Status: clientUpdateProhibited Updated Date: 06-mar-2008 Creation Date: 06-mar-2008 Expiration Date: 06-mar-2009 if you go directly to ARIN and query the IP, you will see that the 4/12/06 date you are seeing is when the IP block that the domain is in was purchased. that is what the ARIN query you did on NETSOL is showing also, i just think you are possibly confused on how to read ARIN/NETSOL records. ARIN only deals with actual IP addresses, not domains. so any query you would do with them will show the actual IP history. http://ws.arin.net/whois/?queryinput=208.109.181.157 NetRange: 208.109.0.0 - 208.109.255.255 CIDR: 208.109.0.0/16 NetName: GO-DADDY-SOFTWARE-INC NetHandle: NET-208-109-0-0-1 Parent: NET-208-0-0-0-0 NetType: Direct Allocation NameServer: CNS1.SECURESERVER.NET NameServer: CNS2.SECURESERVER.NET NameServer: CNS3.SECURESERVER.NET Comment: RegDate: 2006-04-12 Updated: 2007-06-14 InterNIC also (obviously) reflects the domain itself being created on 03/06/2008. http://reports.internic.net/cgi/whois?whoi...amp;type=domain Oh, aight...I gotcha. I guess he just reserved the name of the website in '06? BTW, I wasn't trying to flame or anything, just basically wondering. Also, I SERIOUSLY Doubt that the University knew anything about that website. Even if the NCAA found out that they did, it'd only be a Secondary/Minor Violation, I think. Hell I really don't know anymore, seems to me that the NCAA changes their Rule Book every year like the Federal Government does with the Taxes. I want to know more about this Lee "Personal Caretaker" Thomas fella. Has he been taking care of "The Snowman" since he's been there? How many more athletes is he a "Caretaker" of? Also, WTF does "Caretaker" actually mean? If an athlete needs money, does the "Caretaker" "take......care" of that? If they need to borrow a car for a Hot Date, does he take care of that? Maybe one of you REC members can shed some light on what a "Caretaker" is. no, the IP range that the IP associated with the domain name is in was acquired back in 06. when hosting companies purchase addresses, they usually do it in bulk and in blocks. ARIN does not deal with domain names, so if you are looking for info on an actual domain name using them is useless. if you do an ARIN lookup on an IP it will give you the information on that actual IP address, it does not pull domain name data. you pull the domain name data from InterNIC or ICANN. you have to understand, i can take an IP address today and assign it to skeeterlovesprowler.com. a week from now, i can take that same IP address and assign it to hoopielovesprowlermore.com. i can change the IP address that a domain name points to every few days if i wanted, as long as i changed the nameserver info with the registrar and as long as it had enough time to propogate to all of the nameservers across the globe. i know you're not trying to flame, i just think you honestly don't understand completely how all that works. what worries me about the whole "caretaker" thing, the way Johns' attorney talked today in an interview in the MPR, he is saying that this guy isn't close to Johns as he claims to be. who knows. i don't think he was of the "REC" variety, if you know what i mean. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WAR-MATT 2 Posted June 28, 2008 Share Posted June 28, 2008 what worries me about the whole "caretaker" thing, the way Johns' attorney talked today in an interview in the MPR, he is saying that this guy isn't close to Johns as he claims to be. who knows. i don't think he was of the "REC" variety, if you know what i mean. You're right. He's just an average bama alum with an extra 12k to drop on a guy he hardly knows. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
runswithscissors 33 Posted June 28, 2008 Share Posted June 28, 2008 what worries me about the whole "caretaker" thing, the way Johns' attorney talked today in an interview in the MPR, he is saying that this guy isn't close to Johns as he claims to be. who knows. i don't think he was of the "REC" variety, if you know what i mean. You're right. He's just an average bama alum with an extra 12k to drop on a guy he hardly knows. actually, i don't believe Thomas is a Bama alumni. however, the lawyer that he retained is. you're probably getting the two confused. i think the best description of Thomas is a business associate, and i'm not so sure thats a good thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WAR-MATT 2 Posted June 28, 2008 Share Posted June 28, 2008 Is it this guy? DocInBox If so, click on the education tab. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tigermike 3,046 Posted June 28, 2008 Share Posted June 28, 2008 what worries me about the whole "caretaker" thing, the way Johns' attorney talked today in an interview in the MPR, he is saying that this guy isn't close to Johns as he claims to be. who knows. i don't think he was of the "REC" variety, if you know what i mean. You're right. He's just an average bama alum with an extra 12k to drop on a guy he hardly knows. actually, i don't believe Thomas is a Bama alumni. however, the lawyer that he retained is. you're probably getting the two confused. i think the best description of Thomas is a business associate, and i'm not so sure thats a good thing. Actually I don't think Logan Young was a Bama alumni, was he? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prowler 1 Posted June 28, 2008 Author Share Posted June 28, 2008 Is it this guy? DocInBox If so, click on the education tab. That would be him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AU Cav 0 Posted June 28, 2008 Share Posted June 28, 2008 Is it this guy? DocInBox If so, click on the education tab. That would be him. I'm pretty sure RWS has no credibility now. He 'thinks' someone wasn't a graduate from Alabama. He lists some factual information that was false and when corrected said he had a browser malfunction? Little things that we'd take as truthful are turning out to be blatantly false. I don't know about the rest of you guys but anytime he posts a stat or pseudo-fact without a link I'm summarily dismissing it. Don't dress up a lie by proceeding it with 'I believe', etc. I'm just saying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
runswithscissors 33 Posted June 28, 2008 Share Posted June 28, 2008 Is it this guy? DocInBox If so, click on the education tab. That would be him. I'm pretty sure RWS has no credibility now. He 'thinks' someone wasn't a graduate from Alabama. He lists some factual information that was false and when corrected said he had a browser malfunction? Little things that we'd take as truthful are turning out to be blatantly false. I don't know about the rest of you guys but anytime he posts a stat or pseudo-fact without a link I'm summarily dismissing it. Don't dress up a lie by proceeding it with 'I believe', etc. I'm just saying. because i did not think he was a graduate. the only person i remembered seeing reported as a graduate was his lawyer. excuse me for my Adobe Acrobat not working properly. in the future, i will ask my laptop to please not make any more errors for your sake. i hope it will listen to me. any time i have made an error here, i have happily stood corrected. i have no problem admitting if i was wrong about something. i usually do not make a strong point unless i am certain, but if i am less than certain i don't make such a strong point. thank you for the pep talk, Mr. Perfect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Proud Tiger 4,261 Posted June 30, 2008 Share Posted June 30, 2008 I'm not sure how true this is, but.... Jimmy John's Pit Bull Website was Registered on April 12th, 2006.....Meaning that there's a possibility that he's been ineligible since April 12th, 2006. http://www.networksolutions.com/whois/arin...hnspitbulls.com You know what's sad? They would only have to give up 13 wins. They could lose a lot more than 13 wins if the NCAA looked at the whole bama thing and cited them for lack of institutional control. They could get the DP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoopie 6 Posted June 30, 2008 Share Posted June 30, 2008 I'm not sure how true this is, but.... Jimmy John's Pit Bull Website was Registered on April 12th, 2006.....Meaning that there's a possibility that he's been ineligible since April 12th, 2006. http://www.networksolutions.com/whois/arin...hnspitbulls.com You know what's sad? They would only have to give up 13 wins. They could lose a lot more than 13 wins if the NCAA looked at the whole bama thing and cited them for lack of institutional control. They could get the DP. The only way they get the DP is if Alumn/supporters are too involved. If year after year of criminals run amuck got you the DP, then FSU, Miami and Tenn would have been executed long ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quietfan 233 Posted July 1, 2008 Share Posted July 1, 2008 They could lose a lot more than 13 wins if the NCAA looked at the whole bama thing and cited them for lack of institutional control. They could get the DP. The only way they get the DP is if Alumn/supporters are too involved. If year after year of criminals run amuck got you the DP, then FSU, Miami and Tenn would have been executed long ago. I don't think you get LOIC for alumni/booster actions (if so, they would have cited them for Memphis/Logan Young). "Institutional control" means coaches/staff/University officials in on the mix, or knowingly turning a blind eye. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SouthLink02 8 Posted July 2, 2008 Share Posted July 2, 2008 I hope the guy gets his life in order Cocaine charges and this....just a bad bad last few months for the guy Hopefully these charges wake him up and get him on the right path and I am sure most of you all feel the same way I don't like seeing anyone go down for cocaine charges Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.