Auburntiger341345162773 0 Posted April 28, 2009 Share Posted April 28, 2009 I know all of us would like more than one. This is just if you HAD to choose ONE. explain your choice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rbwareagle34 0 Posted April 28, 2009 Share Posted April 28, 2009 I say Lattimore because he reminds me a lot of Ronnie Brown. He is extremely versatile, has good speed, and great vision. Believe me though it was a tough call between all 3 of them but if I had to chose one, I'd say Lattimore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Auburntiger341345162773 0 Posted April 28, 2009 Author Share Posted April 28, 2009 I dont subscribe to any scouting websites so i had to go off pictures and not videos. I just chose the guy who looked like he would be the best. that was Seastrunk because of the that picture where he almost jumps over the other guy when he is catching a pass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spsfootball11 0 Posted April 28, 2009 Share Posted April 28, 2009 I say Lattimore because I think he is more of a do-it-all back. He can catch, run for power, run for speed. I like Dyer a lot and Seastunk. Dyer is a beast at 5' 9" and Seastrunk is probably one of the fastest players in the class. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Auburntiger341345162773 0 Posted April 28, 2009 Author Share Posted April 28, 2009 no one cares what you think will Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Auburntiger341345162773 0 Posted April 28, 2009 Author Share Posted April 28, 2009 I just watched a video of Seastrunk. He can start and stop on a dime. He didnt show much power but he did show a little bit. The main ability he has is that he was by far faster than anyone else on the field. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tigerjeffm 0 Posted April 28, 2009 Share Posted April 28, 2009 We want Seastrunk. Trust me on this. If Malzahn could build his own running back out of legos, it would look like seastrunk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rbwareagle34 0 Posted April 28, 2009 Share Posted April 28, 2009 Yeah actually I change my vote... Seastrunk it is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Auburntiger341345162773 0 Posted April 28, 2009 Author Share Posted April 28, 2009 You can change it on the poll part Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jackson-Sullivan 0 Posted April 28, 2009 Share Posted April 28, 2009 I would have to go Seastrunk with Dyer being a very close second. They are both very special. Lattimore is very talented, also, but as of right now (and things could definitely change) that is how I feel about the three in that order. Very tough, though. Very, very tough. They are all on the same level I think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rbwareagle34 0 Posted April 28, 2009 Share Posted April 28, 2009 You can change it on the poll part Gotcha! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grfsg 0 Posted April 28, 2009 Share Posted April 28, 2009 tigerjeffm, I disagree, Dyer's the one we want. I watched all of their videos and Dyer has it all. Lattimore had decent speed but his best weapon is his vision. However, once he got beyond the second level the linebackers easily took him down with a light bump on the thigh. Lache is a close second but I wonder if his small body could handle SEC football. Dyer is the complete package. He runs a 4.4 flat, has a compact body that weighs over 200 lbs with room to grow. And as an added bonus, you could never find the little bugger cuz he's so short. That's what Oregon St. did to USC to beat them. He's got speed, power, vision and can make the first guy miss. This is our guy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUSportTalk 4 Posted April 28, 2009 Share Posted April 28, 2009 I think you could make an argument about any of these RB's except for AUSportTalk LOL with that being said that means that all of them are very good!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
auburn4ever 1,266 Posted April 28, 2009 Share Posted April 28, 2009 How come I'm not on your list? that cuts deep. REALLY DEEP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Auburntiger341345162773 0 Posted April 29, 2009 Author Share Posted April 29, 2009 I didnt put sporttalk as an option someone else changed it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUSportTalk 4 Posted April 29, 2009 Share Posted April 29, 2009 I didnt put sporttalk as an option someone else changed it LOL I did...I wanted to throw some people off and then I voted for myself b/c I have some moves!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Auburntiger341345162773 0 Posted April 29, 2009 Author Share Posted April 29, 2009 Haha i was confused about it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tigzilla 0 Posted April 29, 2009 Share Posted April 29, 2009 I didnt put sporttalk as an option someone else changed it LOL I did...I wanted to throw some people off and then I voted for myself b/c I have some moves!! I was wondering where that vote came from. lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jackson-Sullivan 0 Posted April 29, 2009 Share Posted April 29, 2009 HaHa!!! You idiot!!! That was good! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bow9den 0 Posted April 29, 2009 Share Posted April 29, 2009 Any of them and i will be happy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grfsg 0 Posted April 30, 2009 Share Posted April 30, 2009 Michael Dyer: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ChOS_tW-PLk Marcus Lattimore: http://video.aol.com/video-detail/marcus-lattimore/738349053 Check out both of these and tell me which one looks more impressive. I'm sorry Marcus fans, I would be thrilled to have him, he's got size, speed, and vision which are great building blocks for an SEC back but Dyer looks like he's got it all. Speed, elusiveness, vision, power, and tenacity. If I could only have one and I had to choose, it would be Dyer. But there's another back that we seem to be forgetting about. Corey Grant: http://insider.espn.go.com/ncf/recruiting/tracker/player?recruitId=69699&season=2010&action=login&appRedirect=http%3a%2f%2finsider.espn.go.com%2fncf%2frecruiting%2ftracker%2fplayer%3frecruitId%3d69699%26season%3d2010 This guy is FAST! And he's right in our own backyard. We just CAN'T let this guy go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rbwareagle34 0 Posted April 30, 2009 Share Posted April 30, 2009 Hey G, looks like the coaches were a step ahead of you!! http://auburnundercover.com/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jackson-Sullivan 0 Posted April 30, 2009 Share Posted April 30, 2009 Grant is very good. Very good! I guess it would be a nice problem to be trying to figure out if we have enough room for someone of his caliber, depending on how many of these other guys sign with us. Most seem to agree that Dyer looks the best on the videos that we've seen and I would have to tend to agree. He is phenominal. He is starting to be compared to Barry Sanders by many in the area where he is from. They say he could be THAT special! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grfsg 0 Posted April 30, 2009 Share Posted April 30, 2009 Lattimore is good, but he goes down too easily Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Auburntiger341345162773 0 Posted April 30, 2009 Author Share Posted April 30, 2009 That was the first video i have seen of dyer. I didnt see him go down on the first his once. He is very impressive. It looks like he is running slow but he is faster than anyone else that he played so im not sure about his speed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.