Jump to content

uat board supports uab to aac


Auburn Kev

Recommended Posts

Quote

UA BOT would support UAB’s push for new conference

 
 

By Joseph Goodman | jgoodman@al.com

The Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama System would likely support a push by UAB to join the American Athletic Conference, according to independent sources familiar with the governing body’s thinking.

The support of the UA Board of Trustees is an enormous step towards progress for a university system that is emerging as one of the healthiest in the country. A move to the AAC by UAB would put the UA System in position to have the top football programs among both the Power 5 and Group of 5 conferences.

Imagine a college-football postseason that features Alabama in the College Football Playoff and UAB playing in a New Year’s Six bowl game as the automatic Group of 5 qualifier. That scenario isn’t farfetched considering the rapid rise of UAB football since its return to the sport two years ago. It hasn’t lost at home since The Return, and won Conference USA last season.

The Big East is expected to announce in New York on Thursday the addition of the University of Connecticut. That move would give the AAC 11 member universities, and potentially create an open spot in the conference. A recent report by the Cincinnati Enquirer suggested that the AAC might not replace UConn with a football-playing member, but if the league chooses to add a new member, then UAB brings a strong résumé to the table.

Asked if the UA Board of Trustees would support a move by UAB to the AAC, one top-level university source said the Board would be “all in” in support of conference realignment. Another UA Board of Trustees insider said its appointed members, who govern the University of Alabama, UAB and UAH, would “for sure” support UAB in a bid to join the AAC.

Support by the UA Board of Trustees for UAB athletics was the subject of intense scrutiny during UAB’s decision to end football in 2014. For a move to the AAC to even be a possibility for UAB it would need support and behind-the-scenes backing from the UA Board of Trustees, which is one of the most powerful entities in the state.

Considering how contentious the saga over football became in 2015, detractors of the UA Board of Trustees will linger for years and naysayers of UAB athletics will persist as well. All the bluster aside, no one can dispute the massive growth of UAB’s undergraduate campus since the return of football.

With the support of the UA Board of Trustees, UAB has invested over $400 million in facilities over the last five years. UAB also recently completed a $1 billion fund-raising campaign. In addition to those enhancements, UAB was named the top young university in the country last year, and has partnered with the City of Birmingham, Jefferson County and others to build a new downtown football stadium.

The new downtown stadium will give UAB one of the most impressive and unique home fields among Group of 5 teams in the country.

UAB football was left behind in 2013 when its peer universities and traditional rivals moved from Conference USA to the American Athletic Conference. UAB athletics were then left for dead in 2014 when president Ray Watts made the difficult decision to shutter a football program that was hemorrhaging money, didn’t have the proper facilities or support to thrive and played at Legion Field, a cavernous tomb of a stadium.

Now a media darling with a movie-script worthy comeback story, UAB football has a new $23 million on-campus football complex, and a state-of-the-art football stadium scheduled for completion in 2021 located in ESPN’s top television market for college football. Coverage by ESPN has played a major role in the resurrection of UAB football, and that relationship could carry weight behind the scenes if the network wants a 12th team added to the AAC for contractual and content purposes.

In addition to the potential of UAB football, the university recently built one of the top on-campus soccer stadiums in the country (BBVA Field), and a new track-and-field complex. UAB was a university that didn’t properly support its athletics when it was passed over during conference realignment in 2013. That is no longer the case.

If reports are true, then UConn is moving back to the Big East to compete once again with its traditional basketball rivals. A move to the AAC would do the same for UAB and member schools in the league. Traditionally, Memphis is one of UAB’s top rivals, but the Blazers also shared conference basketball rivalries with Cincinnati and Houston. On the football field, UAB’s top CUSA rivals were Memphis, East Carolina, UCF, Houston and Tulane.

Support for UAB by Memphis to join the AAC could carry considerable weight, and allow both schools to rekindle their football rivalry. The Battle of the Bones, which features one of the best rivalry trophies in all of college football, hasn’t been played since 2012. The renewed non-conference basketball series between UAB and Memphis has benefited both universities in recent years. Memphis plays at UAB this season.

Since the return of UAB football, the university’s president (Dr. Watts), Birmingham and Jefferson County have played important roles in positioning UAB for the future. Now is the time to take the next step forward, and having the support of the UA Board of Trustees could make the difference.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites





uat has changed their tune from wanting to kill UAB football to now being all for it all along.

They have a hidden agenda, probably in the form of recruiting and transfers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/1/2019 at 10:37 AM, TigerOne said:

uat has changed their tune from wanting to kill UAB football to now being all for it all along.

They have a hidden agenda, probably in the form of recruiting and transfers.

Is UAB now fully self-sustainable?  That may be the reason uat is now making a show of support.  :dunno:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought after the whole deal with the football team being shut down, UAB was trying to gain independence from UAT?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That being said i hope it happens. Id love to see us schedule the likes of UAB, USA, Jax State, and Troy more often than the Kent States, Georgia Southerns, and Tulanes of the world. Why give that money to out of state universities when we have programs in the state who could use the money and exposure. 

I wasnt at the Jax State game where they almost beat us... But i was at the UAB game the first and only time we have played them in 1996.

I just think we should be playing our in state schools for our OOC games (not counting the one big OOC game.) Those little schools get paid big money and can provide half their yearly football budget sometimes with one game. There is no reason NOT to give that money to in state schools...not that i see anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/7/2019 at 12:07 PM, Auburn2Eugene said:

That being said i hope it happens. Id love to see us schedule the likes of UAB, USA, Jax State, and Troy more often than the Kent States, Georgia Southerns, and Tulanes of the world. Why give that money to out of state universities when we have programs in the state who could use the money and exposure. 

I wasnt at the Jax State game where they almost beat us... But i was at the UAB game the first and only time we have played them in 1996.

I just think we should be playing our in state schools for our OOC games (not counting the one big OOC game.) Those little schools get paid big money and can provide half their yearly football budget sometimes with one game. There is no reason NOT to give that money to in state schools...not that i see anyway.

I don’t disagree on the in-state schools AU has been scheduling, but no thanks on writing a check to a school in the UA system.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/8/2019 at 4:36 PM, AUFlyer99 said:

I don’t disagree on the in-state schools AU has been scheduling, but no thanks on writing a check to a school in the UA system.  

So you have no problem giving the money and exposure to Troy, Jax State, or USA... But have no interest in giving said money and exposure to UAB? Perhaps you missed UABs football program getting shut down by  UAT people? I doubt UAB is too fond of them... And even if they are... I wouldnt bat an eye with giving UAB the money and exposure they would get by being on our schedule on a yearly basis. 

And the fact you wouldnt like it simply because they are in the UAT system is little brother syndrome at its finest. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/13/2019 at 1:49 AM, Auburn2Eugene said:

So you have no problem giving the money and exposure to Troy, Jax State, or USA... But have no interest in giving said money and exposure to UAB? Perhaps you missed UABs football program getting shut down by  UAT people? I doubt UAB is too fond of them... And even if they are... I wouldnt bat an eye with giving UAB the money and exposure they would get by being on our schedule on a yearly basis. 

And the fact you wouldnt like it simply because they are in the UAT system is little brother syndrome at its finest. 

I followed every bit of the UAB Football nonsense.  However, the UA system is the UA system, and I’d rather that money go to other in-state schools. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 7/18/2019 at 9:50 PM, Auburn06 said:

UAB to AAC!

Jacksonville State to Conference USA!!

J'Ville would have to graduate out of FCS though. I haven't the slightest clue what their attendence and scholarship numbers look like. An interesting proposal though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...