Jump to content

The President of Peace strikes again


SocialCircle

Recommended Posts

First one since Ike who hasn't gotten us into a new conflict and now his 3rd Middle East peace deal.  WOW!!  No wonder they didn't want to discuss foreign policy at any of these debates. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites





19 hours ago, SocialCircle said:

First one since Ike who hasn't gotten us into a new conflict and now his 3rd Middle East peace deal.  WOW!!  No wonder they didn't want to discuss foreign policy at any of these debates. 

I don’t believe liberals are interested in ACTUAL accomplishments.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/24/2020 at 8:47 AM, jj3jordan said:

I don’t believe liberals are interested in ACTUAL accomplishments.  

It’s an illness. Incapable of positivity. Addiction to anger. All resulting from being dishonest with themselves. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, alexava said:

It’s an illness. Incapable of positivity. Addiction to anger. All resulting from being dishonest with themselves. 

Obsession with racism I must add to the illness you described.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The "President of Peace" strikes again.     What irony. :rolleyes:

 

COVID-19 has killed more Americans than the 5 most recent wars combined

.........Already, COVID-19 has killed more people in the U.S. than Americans killed in battle during the five most recent wars combined: the Korean War, the Vietnam War, the Iraq War, the War in Afghanistan and the Persian Gulf War.

The loss of life is like suffering the effects of 109 Hurricane Katrinas. Or enduring the 9/11 attacks every day for 66 days.

And researchers project almost 180,000 additional COVID-19 deaths by January 1.

But it doesn't have to be that way.

"Increasing mask use to 95% can save nearly 115,000 lives, reducing that expected number of deaths by 62.7%," the IHME said.

And the same mask wearing, physical distancing and hand washing that protect against COVID-19 can also help avert a flu-and-coronavirus "twin-demic" that could overwhelm the health care system.......

https://www.ctvnews.ca/world/covid-19-has-killed-more-americans-than-the-5-most-recent-wars-combined-1.5115916

 

White House signals defeat in pandemic as coronavirus outbreak roils Pence’s office

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/pence-coronavirus-outbreak/2020/10/25/923bb382-16d5-11eb-befb-8864259bd2d8_story.html

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, homersapien said:

......Already, COVID-19 has killed more people in the U.S. than Americans killed in battle during the five most recent wars combined: the Korean War, the Vietnam War, the Iraq War, the War in Afghanistan and the Persian Gulf War.

Yes it has. However, I've never seen a single Lefty/Democrat put forth a plan that would have changed this. They would have made it worse. President Trump was called a xenophobe for the European travel ban and a racist for the China travel ban. Both of those bans helped fight the virus.

All that while Pelosi told people to go to Chinatown and party in the streets. The head health person in New York told people to ride the subways, go out to restaurants and don't believe Trump's fear mongering. Cuomo forced sick people back into nursing homes when Trump had provided ample hospital space all around New York. The Navy's hospital ship used 137 beds out of a thousand available while The governors of New York and New Jersey were refusing to use that resource and therefore killed thousands of people who should have lived.

The Democrats made this pandemic much, much worse than it had to be. Trying to blame the President for a death total made worse by Democrats is asinine. I don't think Americans are stupid enough to believe this lie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mikey said:

Yes it has. However, I've never seen a single Lefty/Democrat put forth a plan that would have changed this. They would have made it worse. President Trump was called a xenophobe for the European travel ban and a racist for the China travel ban. Both of those bans helped fight the virus.

All that while Pelosi told people to go to Chinatown and party in the streets. The head health person in New York told people to ride the subways, go out to restaurants and don't believe Trump's fear mongering. Cuomo forced sick people back into nursing homes when Trump had provided ample hospital space all around New York. The Navy's hospital ship used 137 beds out of a thousand available while The governors of New York and New Jersey were refusing to use that resource and therefore killed thousands of people who should have lived.

The Democrats made this pandemic much, much worse than it had to be. Trying to blame the President for a death total made worse by Democrats is asinine. I don't think Americans are stupid enough to believe this lie.

I think without Covid-19 Trump would be re-elected easily.  However, Covid-19 has made it less likely he will get re-elected. I also don't think anyone would have handled it any better and likely would have handled it worse as it relates to actions taken. I so think others would likely have handled the messaging better. Of course, it really hurts when the majority of the media is against you no matter what you do.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SocialCircle said:

I think without Covid-19 Trump would be re-elected easily.  However, Covid-19 has made it less likely he will get re-elected. I also don't think anyone would have handled it any better and likely would have handled it worse as it relates to actions taken. I so think others would likely have handled the messaging better. Of course, it really hurts when the majority of the media is against you no matter what you do.  

The media is not responsible for Trump's lying about the virus nor his politicizing common sense measures to reduce the infection rate - like wearing masks.  Trump has been counter-productive from the beginning.

You are a fool if you think we would not have done better - or we would be doing better now - with a more responsible, science-respecting POTUS, Democrat or Republican.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, homersapien said:

The media is not responsible for Trump's lying about the virus nor his politicizing common sense measures to reduce the infection rate - like wearing masks.  Trump has been counter-productive from the beginning.

You are a fool if you think we would not have done better - or we would be doing better now - with a more responsible, science-respecting POTUS, Democrat or Republican.

 

Perhaps another leader would have actually caused a panic over more than just toilet paper and hand sanitizer.....who knows.  I do wish he had encouraged mask wearing more.  I also wish Fauci and then the media hadn't said masks weren't good to wear at the beginning also. I think he got hospital beds and rooms built like nobody else would have and got those ships to NY and CA like nobody else would have done as well. I know both Cuomo and Newsom sung his praises earlier. I wish the CDC would have gotten it right on testing early on too. I think we are very likely to have a vaccine distributed faster than most other leaders because of Trump as well.  I also think the initial spread would have been larger and more widespread earlier with most other leaders who wouldn't have issued travel bans.  I think our economy would be much. much worse off than it is now with most Democrats as evidenced by the state by state economies today. More schools would also likely be closed if not for Trump right now too.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, SocialCircle said:

Perhaps another leader would have actually caused a panic over more than just toilet paper and hand sanitizer.....who knows.  I do wish he had encouraged mask wearing more.  I also wish Fauci and then the media hadn't said masks weren't good to wear at the beginning also. I think he got hospital beds and rooms built like nobody else would have and got those ships to NY and CA like nobody else would have done as well. I know both Cuomo and Newsom sung his praises earlier. I wish the CDC would have gotten it right on testing early on too. I think we are very likely to have a vaccine distributed faster than most other leaders because of Trump as well.  I also think the initial spread would have been larger and more widespread earlier with most other leaders who wouldn't have issued travel bans.  I think our economy would be much. much worse off than it is now with most Democrats as evidenced by the state by state economies today. More schools would also likely be closed if not for Trump right now too.   

You can try to spin the actual history all you want, It's what I would expect from a MAGA cultists.  But it won't matter. Trump will be remembered for this.  His salient failures far outweigh any positives.

Here's a preview of that the actual history, written by a conservative using interviews with officials in his administration:

 

Here are the Trump administration’s four most profound failures in the pandemic

Oct. 27, 2020

 

On Election Day 2020, it is probable than more than 60,000 Americans will be newly infected with covid-19, in a pandemic that has taken at least a quarter-million lives and threatens many more.

This is the main context for the presidential election. Interviews with senior officials, who asked to maintain anonymity because they fear retaliation, offer the picture of a largely functional government betrayed by a deeply dysfunctional leader.

Taken together, their testimony outlines four failures of judgment and leadership that have worsened the trajectory of the pandemic in the United States.

···

The first is a sin of omission — the failure to act when clear duties arise.

The federal government’s response to covid-19 began poorly in early February. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention produced a test for the virus that was contaminated and initially useless. As errors go, this was a serious one. No country can shape an adequate pandemic response without some idea of the location and extent of infections.

Yet errors in the initial response to a complex national challenge are to be expected. Successful leadership adapts quickly and shifts course. But when testing faltered, the Trump administration did not rise to the moment, even though there were solutions at hand — employing the effective World Health Organization test, or allowing labs to develop and use their own. Weeks passed as the health bureaucracy churned.

The cost of this testing disaster was immediate and high. In February, plans were suggested for random testing in emergency rooms around the country. “It never happened,” recalls a senior administration official. “Testing was not available. We would have learned weeks earlier that this was out there in the country. We lost at least a month.”

It is doubtful that this information would have allowed for a comprehensive test-and-trace response on the model of South Korea. But getting testing right more quickly might have helped curb the spread early, saving many lives in the process. The White House had the ultimate responsibility to make the system work. But it didn’t.

···

The second error was a sin of commission — the direct betrayal of a duty.

Even as events rushed forward, the Trump administration actively and deceptively played down the extent and seriousness of the crisis. As the danger became undeniable, the president and others in his administration doggedly denied it. “It’s going to disappear,” said President Trump. “We have it so well under control.

There was never a proper sense of emergency at the White House — an attitude that transferred downward across the administration. Some clearly viewed covid-19 as a political problem that could be managed by public relations — as though renaming it the “coronavirus” could shift responsibility away from the president. Instead of disease control, they focused on damage control.

This made little sense as a long-term political strategy. The reality of mounting deaths would inevitably intrude. But there was something else at work here — an attribute of Trump himself. He scorns the bearers of unfavorable tidings. He banishes uncomfortable truths. With Trump, a senior administration official told me, there is “punishment for delivering bad news.”

This creates a bubble of happy talk around the president. “It is sort of like being in an alternate reality,” another administration official said. “The numbers would tell us that 15 cities were on fire, and two were turning things around. The entire focus was on the two doing good. No focus on the 15 doing poorly.”

How do you successfully manage an unfolding crisis if you refuse to hear bad news? You don’t.

···

The third major error was the Trump administration’s early decision to shift burdens and blame to the states.

By April, an administration strategy had solidified: hand off responsibility for pandemic response to the governors and cease to “own the problem.” With the death toll around 58,000, the administration hoped to declare victory and be done with it. “We have met the moment, and we have prevailed,” Trump said on May 11.

The official handoff involved creating federal guidelines for the safe and careful reopening of states that had closed to fight the pandemic. Trump agreed to the CDC guidelines in an Oval Office meeting on April 15, and they were announced broadly the next day. “If they had been adopted universally,” a senior administration figure told me, “it would have saved tens of thousands of lives.”

The unofficial handoff came on April 17, when Trump tweeted calls to “LIBERATE” Michigan, Virginia and Minnesota. It was, according to one administration official, “the most profound shock of all.” Trump had cast his lot with the shutdown’s populist critics, some of them armed. He began criticizing governors for lacking courage and speed in the process of reopening. And he shelved a second round of more detailed guidance from the CDC.

Blaming the states gave Trump a convenient excuse not to have his own comprehensive, national plan. And sabotaging the reopening standards had the rebounding influence of politicizing public health itself. In a highly polarized environment, reckless behavior became viewed as patriotism. In a crisis requiring behavioral change on a vast scale — wearing masks, social distancing — Trump consistently treated behavioral change as a sign of weakness. “It was increasingly destructive,” a senior administration official said. “It led to thousands of deaths.”

···

The fourth mistake was the administration’s undermining of expertise.

The tendency is most obvious in Trump’s elevation of quack cures. He suggested hydroxychloroquine would be “one of the biggest game changers in the history of medicine.” It has become one of the greatest jokes, with real damage done in the wasted time and resources that could have gone to productive medical purposes.

A greater danger in the midst of the pandemic has been Trump’s irrational trust in outliers. Neither Peter Navarro nor Scott Atlas is an expert in public health or infectious disease. But both gained influence with the president by massaging a portion of his preexisting beliefs — Navarro on rapid reopening, Atlas on herd immunity. These anti-experts have provided bad advice and sought to sabotage rival sources of information. “Not only does the president want to surround himself with yes-men,” a senior administration official told me, “he wants to use yes-men to discredit the reputations of truth tellers.”

Attempting to argue with Trump on scientific matters is a difficult enterprise. He doesn’t distinguish between anecdote and evidence, and political need outweighs actual science. “He only sees through the lens of his political fortunes,” said one official. “Nothing else counts.”

···

The past several months have not been without successes in the fight against covid-19. Because of improvements in treatment, fewer who get the disease die. Progress on vaccines has come more quickly than any precedent. These achievements may eventually mitigate some of the failures of the first eight months.

But today we start from a shockingly high level of new infections. Coming are holiday travel and increasing time spent indoors in winter. On Election Day 2020, the United States will be in another precarious place. Once again, Trump is insisting we are turning the corner on covid-19. One administration official responds: “We are turning the corner — into a dark alley.”

The covid-19 crisis does not have a single cause, but it has revealed Trump as he is. His leadership skills are nonexistent. He is not talented, effective or even particularly cunning. He is simply outmatched, and eager to shift the blame. In the past eight months, the United States has led the world in deaths from covid-19. Trump has led the world in the production of alibis. His failures of wisdom and judgment have imposed massive, tragic costs on our country. And justice will be served if they cost him reelection.

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/10/27/here-are-trump-administrations-four-most-profound-failures-pandemic/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, homersapien said:

You can try to spin the actual history all you want, It's what I would expect from a MAGA cultists.  But it won't matter. Trump will be remembered for this.  His salient failures far outweigh any positives.

Here's a preview of that the actual history, written by a conservative using interviews with officials in his administration:

 

Here are the Trump administration’s four most profound failures in the pandemic

Oct. 27, 2020

 

On Election Day 2020, it is probable than more than 60,000 Americans will be newly infected with covid-19, in a pandemic that has taken at least a quarter-million lives and threatens many more.

This is the main context for the presidential election. Interviews with senior officials, who asked to maintain anonymity because they fear retaliation, offer the picture of a largely functional government betrayed by a deeply dysfunctional leader.

Taken together, their testimony outlines four failures of judgment and leadership that have worsened the trajectory of the pandemic in the United States.

···

The first is a sin of omission — the failure to act when clear duties arise.

The federal government’s response to covid-19 began poorly in early February. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention produced a test for the virus that was contaminated and initially useless. As errors go, this was a serious one. No country can shape an adequate pandemic response without some idea of the location and extent of infections.

Yet errors in the initial response to a complex national challenge are to be expected. Successful leadership adapts quickly and shifts course. But when testing faltered, the Trump administration did not rise to the moment, even though there were solutions at hand — employing the effective World Health Organization test, or allowing labs to develop and use their own. Weeks passed as the health bureaucracy churned.

The cost of this testing disaster was immediate and high. In February, plans were suggested for random testing in emergency rooms around the country. “It never happened,” recalls a senior administration official. “Testing was not available. We would have learned weeks earlier that this was out there in the country. We lost at least a month.”

It is doubtful that this information would have allowed for a comprehensive test-and-trace response on the model of South Korea. But getting testing right more quickly might have helped curb the spread early, saving many lives in the process. The White House had the ultimate responsibility to make the system work. But it didn’t.

···

The second error was a sin of commission — the direct betrayal of a duty.

Even as events rushed forward, the Trump administration actively and deceptively played down the extent and seriousness of the crisis. As the danger became undeniable, the president and others in his administration doggedly denied it. “It’s going to disappear,” said President Trump. “We have it so well under control.

There was never a proper sense of emergency at the White House — an attitude that transferred downward across the administration. Some clearly viewed covid-19 as a political problem that could be managed by public relations — as though renaming it the “coronavirus” could shift responsibility away from the president. Instead of disease control, they focused on damage control.

This made little sense as a long-term political strategy. The reality of mounting deaths would inevitably intrude. But there was something else at work here — an attribute of Trump himself. He scorns the bearers of unfavorable tidings. He banishes uncomfortable truths. With Trump, a senior administration official told me, there is “punishment for delivering bad news.”

This creates a bubble of happy talk around the president. “It is sort of like being in an alternate reality,” another administration official said. “The numbers would tell us that 15 cities were on fire, and two were turning things around. The entire focus was on the two doing good. No focus on the 15 doing poorly.”

How do you successfully manage an unfolding crisis if you refuse to hear bad news? You don’t.

···

The third major error was the Trump administration’s early decision to shift burdens and blame to the states.

By April, an administration strategy had solidified: hand off responsibility for pandemic response to the governors and cease to “own the problem.” With the death toll around 58,000, the administration hoped to declare victory and be done with it. “We have met the moment, and we have prevailed,” Trump said on May 11.

The official handoff involved creating federal guidelines for the safe and careful reopening of states that had closed to fight the pandemic. Trump agreed to the CDC guidelines in an Oval Office meeting on April 15, and they were announced broadly the next day. “If they had been adopted universally,” a senior administration figure told me, “it would have saved tens of thousands of lives.”

The unofficial handoff came on April 17, when Trump tweeted calls to “LIBERATE” Michigan, Virginia and Minnesota. It was, according to one administration official, “the most profound shock of all.” Trump had cast his lot with the shutdown’s populist critics, some of them armed. He began criticizing governors for lacking courage and speed in the process of reopening. And he shelved a second round of more detailed guidance from the CDC.

Blaming the states gave Trump a convenient excuse not to have his own comprehensive, national plan. And sabotaging the reopening standards had the rebounding influence of politicizing public health itself. In a highly polarized environment, reckless behavior became viewed as patriotism. In a crisis requiring behavioral change on a vast scale — wearing masks, social distancing — Trump consistently treated behavioral change as a sign of weakness. “It was increasingly destructive,” a senior administration official said. “It led to thousands of deaths.”

···

The fourth mistake was the administration’s undermining of expertise.

The tendency is most obvious in Trump’s elevation of quack cures. He suggested hydroxychloroquine would be “one of the biggest game changers in the history of medicine.” It has become one of the greatest jokes, with real damage done in the wasted time and resources that could have gone to productive medical purposes.

A greater danger in the midst of the pandemic has been Trump’s irrational trust in outliers. Neither Peter Navarro nor Scott Atlas is an expert in public health or infectious disease. But both gained influence with the president by massaging a portion of his preexisting beliefs — Navarro on rapid reopening, Atlas on herd immunity. These anti-experts have provided bad advice and sought to sabotage rival sources of information. “Not only does the president want to surround himself with yes-men,” a senior administration official told me, “he wants to use yes-men to discredit the reputations of truth tellers.”

Attempting to argue with Trump on scientific matters is a difficult enterprise. He doesn’t distinguish between anecdote and evidence, and political need outweighs actual science. “He only sees through the lens of his political fortunes,” said one official. “Nothing else counts.”

···

The past several months have not been without successes in the fight against covid-19. Because of improvements in treatment, fewer who get the disease die. Progress on vaccines has come more quickly than any precedent. These achievements may eventually mitigate some of the failures of the first eight months.

But today we start from a shockingly high level of new infections. Coming are holiday travel and increasing time spent indoors in winter. On Election Day 2020, the United States will be in another precarious place. Once again, Trump is insisting we are turning the corner on covid-19. One administration official responds: “We are turning the corner — into a dark alley.”

The covid-19 crisis does not have a single cause, but it has revealed Trump as he is. His leadership skills are nonexistent. He is not talented, effective or even particularly cunning. He is simply outmatched, and eager to shift the blame. In the past eight months, the United States has led the world in deaths from covid-19. Trump has led the world in the production of alibis. His failures of wisdom and judgment have imposed massive, tragic costs on our country. And justice will be served if they cost him reelection.

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/10/27/here-are-trump-administrations-four-most-profound-failures-pandemic/

Well at least you admit there have been some positives. I have always said Trump could have done better BTW.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, SocialCircle said:

Well at least you admit there have been some positives. I have always said Trump could have done better BTW.  

That's like saying Hitler could have been more compassionate, but at least he loved his dog.  :-\

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...