AUwent

Help me understand: how are we going to be in better position in year 3 if we’re going to be losing 13/22 starters, as it currently appears is going to be the case?

Well, I guess they just decided to reverse the 2024 locations, same opponents. So Georgia series remains screwed up. 🤦‍♂️ Also, Christ on a cracker Florida needs to fire its AD for screwing them/letting them be screwed over like this.

When did I say that we should accept going <=.500 this year?! This season WILL need to be better than last, especially with the number of seniors in the starting lineup.

Again, go look at Pearl’s first three years.

Year one was always going to be rough. At the end of the day the goal was to just make a bowl and we did that. Now in year two and three, of course improvement should be expected/demanded and then in year four a playoff run.

TIL that college basketball didn’t exist prior to November 2017.

Bball + Joker’s philosophy among insiders (which, mind you, I completely understand) A quick gander around the webs suggests we’re not the only ones BTW. Sorry to be depressing here but I can’t help but wonder if people in general are apathetic to CFB with all the changes.

This reminds me of when I saw someone wish we had hired Sark midway through last year. Did you not see how Bruce’s first three years here went? I’m not saying that we should tolerate three years of 6-6 from CHF but this is absurd.

A much needed pickup!

I know losing him sucked but…we’re still in the top 10 on 247 and just outside it on On3, and in the top 10 in average ratings of both. I really don’t see the cause of panic here?

We return Lew, Wade and “Too Tall” Miller this year. As I said, next year we should return Lew and Wright/Muskrat.

Are you talking 24 or 25? I’m so confused! We return three starters in 2024 incl. a pretty damn good transfer who will enable one of those returning starters to move in a position he’s more comfortable with. In 2025 we should return two, since apparently Wright and Muskrat (only one of which should start in 2024) are juniors.

Ridiculous to say inexperienced. 🤷‍♂️

Schrodinger’s NIL, simultaneously one of the best and worst!

As long as we meet my sig’s requirements things should be hunky dory.

Then we’d better be starting lots of freshmen. If we’re starting 13 seniors and you’re correct, we can expect the same result in year 3. I realize this is exactly how it played out with Drinkwitz at Missouri but cmon, there’s no way players like Coleman would stay through that.

We’d better see improvement in record. Going 6-6 again with only 9 starters returning next year is unacceptable. There is just very little reason to start Thorne. But yes, our losses do need to be way more like the games against UGA UAT and OM and not like…well, the others.

7-5. Gradual improvement…

I looked it up too and couldn’t find anything else. SI at this point is one step above FanSided, so 🤷‍♂️ .

Nothing about Devin Williams’ commitment? Solid pickup, I’d say.

And, given all that, one more win in year 2 shouldn’t be too much of an ask. Unless we’re committing to starting a LOT of underclassmen to set up a big jump in year 3.

I think it’s about equal…the two toughest teams on schedule last year were at home. *At least in theory*, I feel like in a rebuilding process it’s better to get the teams that you’d have a better shot at beating on a neutral field anyway. Put it this way—all other things being the same would you want a presidential candidate from whatever largest state is opposite your party (CA or TX) or from a swing state? But if you’re correct and we have as many senior starters as we’re projected to, that would be COMPLETELY UNACCEPTABLE.

I just want one more (reg season) win—if not we’d BETTER be starting at least 15 players who will be back next year.

Should we be worried? I know it's super duper early but it just seems like we're on a bit of a cold streak with regards to targets naming their favorites.

Sorry to double post, but Edward nails it here.