Jump to content

AUwent

Verified Member
  • Posts

    8,624
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by AUwent

  1. Yeah, I think year 4 is really when we make a run. But we're going to have to show improvement between that--can't be like, say, Drinkwitz's first three years.
  2. Gonna be honest, a little frustrated no one has addressed my question earlier. -.-
  3. By no means do I like big money donors having such a say over a program. I'm just sick of people (in our own fanbase and outside of it) acting like we're the only program where that happens.
  4. Alright, this seems to be the most active thread on the subject. So with that in mind, I looked at how ESPN ranked six of our opponents in its early top 25. I'm not mad that we're unranked, my focus here is more on the sentiment that year 3 is when we take a leap. But how are we going to do that if we're full of seniors this year? For example it's hard for me to be enthusiastic about that Lewis guy for this very reason.
  5. https://www.on3.com/pro/news/college-football-odds-ranking-sec-with-las-vegas-2024-win-totals-over-under-top-to-bottom/ Early over/under win total projections are out: Georgia--10.5 Texas--10.5 Alabama--9.5 LSU--9.5 Mississippi--9.5 Missouri--9.5 Tennessee--8.5 Texas A&M--8.5 Auburn--7.5 Oklahoma--7.5 Kentucky--6.5 Arkansas--5.5 Florida--5.5 USCe--5.5 MSU--4.5 Vanderbilt--2.5
  6. He might mean for the longer term future, of course, but I was very surprised by Josh Pate's SEC power rankings (Missouri at #10). https://twitter.com/LateKickJosh/status/1754330548900684077/photo/1
  7. Admittedly not a good weekend commitment wise between KD Riddick and Offord. No reason for panic (yet) given that our 2025 class is still top 10 on Rivals and 247 (top 11 on 247 using average rating), though.
  8. Sucks to replace this much of our staff but I guess this is just CFB moving forward. Unlike with 🥔 we seem to have upgraded with our replacements (at least besides maybe Durkin).
  9. So are you saying the Kelly to DC rumors are false? I’m confused.
  10. If I had to theorize, us and Kiffin are waiting to see if an NFL job comes open. Of course, that might mean we have to hire someone else next year. 🤷‍♂️
  11. Well, I completely agree that improvement is needed, but that's kind of a no-brainer with any coaching staff unless you have a Gus 2013-style first year. Steve Sarkisian went 5-7 and lost to 2-10 Kansas his first year. Brent Venables went 6-7 his first year. To your last point, this might be a good thread for you. I will say, Freeze deserves four years, and if we have to part with him at the end of that, the buyout period for both Gus and Potato will be over and only two years on his will be left.
  12. #1--There's on-field things to question and improvements to be made, but IDK how you can look at our class and get that negative of an impression. #2--If the money men needed instant success in year 1 (with how gutted our roster was) to provide, it never was going to work period. #3--We just paid for two massive buyouts and a facility.
  13. Which is why I wish we hadn't bothered pursuing RW in favor of getting a transfer QB (after we got CC, at least).
  14. The rotation equation has to add up to 15. It's why the two commonly proposed scheduling models are 1/7/7 and 3/6/6, both add up to 15. The first two years of the 14 team era were also technically stop gaps in terms of cross division opponents and even some intra-division games were played in the same spot two years in a row, so it's not hard to imagine the same thing happening here. By the time the 2026 schedules are made, a season of the 12 team playoff will have happened to make everyone feel better about being able to make it. It all smacks of saber rattling to me; I just don't think all the hand-wringing about rivalry loss is going to be proven justified.
  15. Ok, apparently Wright (+ Muskrat) are juniors? EDIT: Also, if I'm being perfectly fair, the median number of returning starters last year in the SEC (not counting the new guys) was 11.5. So by and large, the days of returning >15 starters are over
  16. Worth noting that your numbers don’t quiiiite add up. 2 + 6 + 6 = 14 not 15 That said I’m almost certain they’ll throw another schedule together without any real plan going forward. Basically I expect the vast majority of key rivalries to continue.
  17. At least for this year, feels like the offensive line is shaping up to be a strength for us? But yeah defensive line needs help.
  18. Well, time to take whatever NIL $ we had set aside for him and throw it at positions of need, be that this year or next. 🤷‍♂️
  19. This has been a burning question on my mind for the last month, so lettuce discuss... A lot of us seem to have the consensus that 2025 will be our leap forward, some even saying we shouldn't realistically expect any better than 2023 for 2024 (note that I'm not talking about people who inherently believe CHF will fail, I'm talking about those who think that 2024 will be just like 2023 and then 2025 will be where we start seeing the rebuild bear fruit--the War Rapprt guys for example). Here's the problem: it's very possible this will be a heavily senior laden team, which inevitably means we'd be young in 2025. We could have as few as eight returning starters next year. I know it's extremely early but that's what spec threads are for. But if we're starting as many seniors as we could, that does increase the pressure on the staff to win two more games than 2023 rather than just one more as is my goal. I get that the days of having >15 returning starters is probably over for everyone (most of the time at least) thanks to the TP, but if we're not going to go 9-4-ish, and CERTAINLY if we don't actually win any more games, then we'd better be playing a lot of guys who will be back in 2025 to get the most out of it. Here are my way-too-early guess at the starting lineup: QB--? RB--Jarquez Hunter, Sr WR--Robert Lewis, Sr. WR--Cam Coleman, Fr WR--? TE--Rivaldo Fairweather, Sr OT--Percy Lewis, Sr OT--Izavion Miller, Sr OG--Dillon Wade, Sr OG--Jeremiah Wright, Sr C--Connor Lew, So DE--Keldric Faulk, So NT--Trill Carter, Sr DT--Gage Keys, Jr* Jack--Jalen McLeod, Sr MLB--Austin Keys, Sr WLB--Eugene Asante, Sr CB--Kayin Lee, So CB--Antonio Kite, So S--Jerrin Thompson, Sr S--Caleb Wooden, Jr Star--Keionte Scott, Sr K Alex McPherson, So* P--? *RS
  20. He's clearly an elite talent, but after we got CC I've viewed him purely as icing. Sounds like Sayin, Downs et al. leaving cleared up a lot of $ for them. So, hopefully this clears us some cheddar for us come May to fill some TP needs (looking at tOSU's QB room, one of them has to transfer right...)
  21. Maybe, but keep in mind that this is the final year of Gus's contract period. Two years after that and we'll be free of Potato Man's. In other words, it's very possible we'll have a lot more $ to spend. 🤷‍♂️
  22. Impressive then, that we've gotten the recruiting results we've had.
  23. Austin Mack was a top 100 QB but I'd rather be facing him for the next few years than Sayin, that's for damn sure.
×
×
  • Create New...