AUDub 11,155 Posted May 5, 2015 Share Posted May 5, 2015 So what ? The UK doesn't have the 1st Amendment protection of free speech. Her being banned for calling out radical Islam means nothing. Apparently, you hate free speech. Might want to pack up your bags and head over the pond. Seems you'd be in good company there. Bit of a non sequitur there, Raptor. T4A didn't say she doesn't have the 1st amendment right to be a hateful asshat, only that she is hateful. And she is. The islamophobic s*** she spews could peel the paint off the walls. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AURaptor 1,125 Posted May 5, 2015 Share Posted May 5, 2015 So what ? The UK doesn't have the 1st Amendment protection of free speech. Her being banned for calling out radical Islam means nothing. Apparently, you hate free speech. Might want to pack up your bags and head over the pond. Seems you'd be in good company there. Bit of a non sequitur there, Raptor. T4A didn't say she doesn't have the 1st amendment right to be a hateful asshat, only that she is hateful. And she is. The islamophobic s*** she spews could peel the paint off the walls. Not a jot of anything non sequitur, Bens. The UK has banned folks for the most inane and harmless positions, while allowing radical Islamists to spout off at the mouth and preach pure hate and violence. But to speak out against THEM... unacceptable ? Horse hockey. Calling out militant , homophobic, violent, misogynistic Muslims is far from 'hate speech'. It's TRUTH speech. Time folks wake the hell up and figure out the difference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBlueVue 177 Posted May 5, 2015 Share Posted May 5, 2015 So what ? The UK doesn't have the 1st Amendment protection of free speech. Her being banned for calling out radical Islam means nothing. Apparently, you hate free speech. Might want to pack up your bags and head over the pond. Seems you'd be in good company there. Bit of a non sequitur there, Raptor. T4A didn't say she doesn't have the 1st amendment right to be a hateful asshat, only that she is hateful. And she is. The islamophobic s*** she spews could peel the paint off the walls. Good for her. I refuse to feign righteous indignation about someone holding a satirical art contest when ISIS is brutally murdering chrisitans and kidnapping their children to sell them into slavery. You people have your priorties out of whack. Ive never seen you express any kind of comparable disdain about radical Islamists. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AURaptor 1,125 Posted May 5, 2015 Share Posted May 5, 2015 Sadly, I just have to accept that proggies are intellectually incapable of having rational , logical discussion. That being said, it makes their superciliousness down right comical Yeah, but if they admit they lied, ( stretched the truth ) but still continue on w/ the premise that their LIE was really the truth, which it never was, then they think they've won the argument. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUUSN 823 Posted May 5, 2015 Share Posted May 5, 2015 So what ? The UK doesn't have the 1st Amendment protection of free speech. Her being banned for calling out radical Islam means nothing. Apparently, you hate free speech. Might want to pack up your bags and head over the pond. Seems you'd be in good company there. Bit of a non sequitur there, Raptor. T4A didn't say she doesn't have the 1st amendment right to be a hateful asshat, only that she is hateful. And she is. The islamophobic s*** she spews could peel the paint off the walls. Good for her. I refuse to feign righteous indignation about someone holding a satirical art contest when ISIS is brutally murdering chrisitans and kidnapping their children to sell them into slavery. You people have your priorties out of whack. Ive never seen you express any kind of comparable disdain about radical Islamists. I have, by spending over 28 Months in the Middle East fighting radical Islam. How many holidays have you missed with your family? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBlueVue 177 Posted May 5, 2015 Share Posted May 5, 2015 So what ? The UK doesn't have the 1st Amendment protection of free speech. Her being banned for calling out radical Islam means nothing. Apparently, you hate free speech. Might want to pack up your bags and head over the pond. Seems you'd be in good company there. Bit of a non sequitur there, Raptor. T4A didn't say she doesn't have the 1st amendment right to be a hateful asshat, only that she is hateful. And she is. The islamophobic s*** she spews could peel the paint off the walls. Good for her. I refuse to feign righteous indignation about someone holding a satirical art contest when ISIS is brutally murdering chrisitans and kidnapping their children to sell them into slavery. You people have your priorties out of whack. Ive never seen you express any kind of comparable disdain about radical Islamists. I have, by spending over 28 Months in the Middle East fighting radical Islam. How many holidays have you missed with your family? You have what? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUDub 11,155 Posted May 5, 2015 Share Posted May 5, 2015 Not a jot of anything non sequitur, Bens. The UK has banned folks for the most inane and harmless positions, while allowing radical Islamists to spout off at the mouth and preach pure hate and violence. But to speak out against THEM... unacceptable ? Horse hockey. Calling out militant , homophobic, violent, misogynistic Muslims is far from 'hate speech'. It's TRUTH speech. Time folks wake the hell up and figure out the difference. Good for her. I refuse to feign righteous indignation about someone holding a satirical art contest when ISIS is brutally murdering chrisitans and kidnapping their children to sell them into slavery. You people have your priorties out of whack. Hah! Truth speech? I always love how you guys go the extra mile to justify hate. http://mediamatters....elong-on/167700 Ive never seen you express any kind of comparable disdain about radical Islamists. That's because you have the attention span of a goldfish. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBlueVue 177 Posted May 5, 2015 Share Posted May 5, 2015 Not a jot of anything non sequitur, Bens. The UK has banned folks for the most inane and harmless positions, while allowing radical Islamists to spout off at the mouth and preach pure hate and violence. But to speak out against THEM... unacceptable ? Horse hockey. Calling out militant , homophobic, violent, misogynistic Muslims is far from 'hate speech'. It's TRUTH speech. Time folks wake the hell up and figure out the difference. Good for her. I refuse to feign righteous indignation about someone holding a satirical art contest when ISIS is brutally murdering chrisitans and kidnapping their children to sell them into slavery. You people have your priorties out of whack. Ive never seen you express any kind of comparable disdain about radical Islamists. Hah! Truth speech? I always love how you guys go the extra mile to justify hate. http://mediamatters....elong-on/167700 And its equally fascinating to see how far you people will go making allowances for brutal murderers and act as if those who resent it are haters? Its awesome! George Soros' media matters is a joke Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AURaptor 1,125 Posted May 5, 2015 Share Posted May 5, 2015 Truth = hate ? Ok, fine by me. If you want to sidle up to those who rape children, saw heads off, set fire to or mass execute others... that's on you. Funny, how quick and defiant the proggies are to mock mormons or other religions, when they are lampooned, but anyone does it to Muslims, ... OMG !! HATE !! We all know why. They're scared. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUDub 11,155 Posted May 5, 2015 Share Posted May 5, 2015 And its equally fascinating to see how far you people will go making allowances for brutal murderers and act as if those who resent it are haters? Its awesome! Truth = hate ? Ok, fine by me. If you want to sidle up to those who rape children, saw heads off, set fire to or mass execute others... that's on you. Mmm hmm. :-\ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AURaptor 1,125 Posted May 5, 2015 Share Posted May 5, 2015 And its equally fascinating to see how far you people will go making allowances for brutal murderers and act as if those who resent it are haters? Its awesome! Truth = hate ? Ok, fine by me. If you want to sidle up to those who rape children, saw heads off, set fire to or mass execute others... that's on you. Mmm hmm. :-\ You can't deny that's exactly what they do, and worse. So we get Mmm hmm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUDub 11,155 Posted May 5, 2015 Share Posted May 5, 2015 And its equally fascinating to see how far you people will go making allowances for brutal murderers and act as if those who resent it are haters? Its awesome! Truth = hate ? Ok, fine by me. If you want to sidle up to those who rape children, saw heads off, set fire to or mass execute others... that's on you. Mmm hmm. :-\/> You can't deny that's exactly what they do, and worse. So we get Mmm hmm. I get that y'all are too dense to see that her bile extends far beyond radical Muslims. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBlueVue 177 Posted May 5, 2015 Share Posted May 5, 2015 And its equally fascinating to see how far you people will go making allowances for brutal murderers and act as if those who resent it are haters? Its awesome! Truth = hate ? Ok, fine by me. If you want to sidle up to those who rape children, saw heads off, set fire to or mass execute others... that's on you. Mmm hmm. :-\ You can't deny that's exactly what they do, and worse. So we get Mmm hmm. All one can conclude is they have no problem with murder, pedophilia, rape or selling children into slavery..Their problem is you simply cant say anything about it and if you do, well, you're a racist and a hater. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AURaptor 1,125 Posted May 5, 2015 Share Posted May 5, 2015 Does it freaking MATTER ? I think you're the one who is too dense to understand what you're saying here.... you'll side w/ butchers over free speech. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUDub 11,155 Posted May 5, 2015 Share Posted May 5, 2015 Does it freaking MATTER ? I think you're the one who is too dense to understand what you're saying here.... you'll side w/ butchers over free speech. I did not say she doesn't have the right to hold her abhorrent views. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBlueVue 177 Posted May 5, 2015 Share Posted May 5, 2015 Does it freaking MATTER ? I think you're the one who is too dense to understand what you're saying here.... you'll side w/ butchers over free speech. I did not say she doesn't have the right to hold her abhorrent views. No you didn't but you did call her an asshat? The obvious question I am compelled to ask which is worse...a murderous raping pederast or an asshat free speecher? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUDub 11,155 Posted May 5, 2015 Share Posted May 5, 2015 No you didn't but you did call her an asshat? Yes, I called her an asshat, because that's exactly what she is. The obvious question I am compelled to ask which is worse...a murderous raping pederast or an asshat free speecher? I have no problem with calling murderous, rapist, pedophile loons what they are. That her views extend far beyond that is something y'all don't seem to grasp. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AURaptor 1,125 Posted May 5, 2015 Share Posted May 5, 2015 Does it freaking MATTER ? I think you're the one who is too dense to understand what you're saying here.... you'll side w/ butchers over free speech. I did not say she doesn't have the right to hold her abhorrent views. Her views are divine, in comparison to the truly abhorrent realities of what militant Muslims actually do. I think she and other women, ( former Muslims themselves ) tell a truth about that religion which you'd rather not even think about, so you ignore it. Sorry if you're offended by reality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUDub 11,155 Posted May 5, 2015 Share Posted May 5, 2015 Her views are divine, in comparison to the truly abhorrent realities of what militant Muslims actually do. Here's where we're talking past one another. Calling her out for her own extremism does not lessen the atrociousness of radical Islam. I think she and other women, ( former Muslims themselves ) tell a truth about that religion which you'd rather not even think about, so you ignore it. She makes horrendous blanket indictments of Islam and Muslims in general based on the actions of a minority. Sorry if you're offended by reality. The only thing I'm offended by here is you and Blue accusing me of approving of rape, murder and torture. Somebody should do something about that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
japantiger 4,051 Posted May 5, 2015 Share Posted May 5, 2015 Sadly, I just have to accept that proggies are intellectually incapable of having rational , logical discussion. Pretty much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texan4Auburn 1,626 Posted May 5, 2015 Author Share Posted May 5, 2015 Not an accusation. The woman was even banned from entering the United Kingdom because of it. Her and the shooters are full of hate, and they both will put innocents in the line of far to get their war. So what ? The UK doesn't have the 1st Amendment protection of free speech. Her being banned for calling out radical Islam means nothing. Apparently, you hate free speech. Might want to pack up your bags and head over the pond. Seems you'd be in good company there. No clue what the rant on free speech at me has to do with pointing out she and her group are labeled a racist globally. UK saw through her BS. But if she really is so concerned with free speech then why is she apparently making attempts to block others, namely Muslims, from it? Ibrahim Hooper of the Council on American-Islamic Relations said Geller’s claim to be a defender of free speech was laughable because she had tried unsuccessfully to block the Qatar-based TV network Al Jazeera from expanding into the United States in 2011. “It’s just so hypocritical. She’s regularly trying to silence Muslim organizations and Muslim academics,” Hooper said. http://www.latimes.com/nation/nationnow/la-na-nn-geller-profile-20150504-story.html#page=1 Mean it is really hard to buy the "I'm in it for free speech" line when you are out trying to silence others. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AURaptor 1,125 Posted May 5, 2015 Share Posted May 5, 2015 CAIR is hardly a moderate , objective voice . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBlueVue 177 Posted May 5, 2015 Share Posted May 5, 2015 Her views are divine, in comparison to the truly abhorrent realities of what militant Muslims actually do. Here's where we're talking past one another. Calling her out for her own extremism does not lessen the atrociousness of radical Islam. I think she and other women, ( former Muslims themselves ) tell a truth about that religion which you'd rather not even think about, so you ignore it. She makes horrendous blanket indictments of Islam and Muslims in general based on the actions of a minority. Sorry if you're offended by reality. The only thing I'm offended by here is you and Blue accusing me of approving of rape, murder and torture. Somebody should do something about that. No, actually, all I said was I haven't seen a post from you that expressed as much disdain for murder rape etc as you expressed about Gellar and, I haven't. Im not sure that means you approve of that stuff but you certainly have shown you dont approve of anyone saying anything bad about militant Islamists. It may be a minority causing all the mayhem but they're causing an awful lot of it, not just in the ME but around the globe. You'll have to forgive me, as well, for not having the reference you prescribe for of a religion whose prophet was a murdering pedophile who was married to a 9 year old child. Add to that the fact that he dreamed up some insane martyrdom s*** with the 70 virgins in heaven deal for his prospective followers is beyond strange as well and for most part, those who chose not to follow, he simply chopped their heads off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wdefromtx 3,159 Posted May 6, 2015 Share Posted May 6, 2015 What I want to know is why in the @&$#% would a school district host events like this......either this "contest" or the muslin one put on a few months ago or whenever it was. That's just opening the place up for an attack possibly when kids are there that have nothing to do with this crap. Also, yes we are entitled to free speech.......but it is really obvious this group is doing this just to stir the pot and see if they can provoke violence and hiding behind it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUUSN 823 Posted May 6, 2015 Share Posted May 6, 2015 What I want to know is why in the @&$#% would a school district host events like this......either this "contest" or the muslin one put on a few months ago or whenever it was. That's just opening the place up for an attack possibly when kids are there that have nothing to do with this crap. Also, yes we are entitled to free speech.......but it is really obvious this group is doing this just to stir the pot and see if they can provoke violence and hiding behind it. Please post more often. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.