Conservative judicial activism

[Piglet 0]

http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/arti...EWS01/505260481

A couple divorces. Both parents practice something called "Wiccan" religion, which apparently is one of those pagan religions where they worship the Earth. Not my cup of coffee, but it's a free country.

The judge, apparently without being asked by either party to the suit, throws an order into the divorce decree forbidding the parents to expose their child to "non mainstream religion". I'm not sure what 'not mainstrem' means, but next time it could be charismatic evangelism.

This is why I mostly support the ACLU. You think this is a situation where it might be useful to have a political group to protect people's civil liberties, including their free exercise rights under the First Amendment?

[Auburn85 432]

Yeah, but at the same time.. I think there needs to be a new group. The ACLU can go aroud doing 10 stupid things to only 1 good cause