Jump to content

Only Republicans are Corrupt


AFTiger

Recommended Posts

Feinstein’s Cardinal shenanigans

By David Keene

April 30, 2007

Anyone who knows much about real power in Congress knows that almost every member of the House and Senate lusts after a seat on the Appropriations Committee and hopes one day to achieve the status of Cardinal. The Cardinals, of course, are the folks who chair the various Appropriations Committee subcommittees and literally control the billions of dollars that pass through their hands.

California Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D) chairs the Senate Rules Committee, but she’s also a Cardinal. She is currently chairwoman of the Interior, Environment and Related Agencies subcommittee, but until last year was for six years the top Democrat on the Military Construction, Veterans Affairs, and Related Agencies (or “Milcon”) sub-committee, where she may have directed more than $1 billion to companies controlled by her husband.

If the inferences finally coming out about what she did while on Milcon prove true, she may be on the way to morphing from a respected senior Democrat into another poster child for congressional corruption.

The problems stem from her subcommittee activities from 2001 to late 2005, when she quit. During that period the public record suggests she knowingly took part in decisions that eventually put millions of dollars into her husband’s pocket — the classic conflict of interest that exploited her position and power to channel money to her husband’s companies.

In other words, it appears Sen. Feinstein was up to her ears in the same sort of shenanigans that landed California Rep. Randy “Duke” Cunningham ® in the slammer. Indeed, it may be that the primary difference between the two is basically that Cunningham was a minor leaguer and a lot dumber than his state’s senior senator.

Melanie Sloan, the executive director of Citizens for Responsible Ethics in Washington, or CREW, usually focuses on the ethical lapses of Republicans and conservatives, but even she is appalled at the way Sen. Feinstein has abused her position. Sloan told a California reporter earlier this month that while”there are a number of members of Congress with conflicts of interest … because of the amount of money involved, Feinstein’s conflict of interest is an order of magnitude greater than those conflicts.”

And the director of the Project on Government Oversight who examined the evidence of wrongdoing assembled by California writer Peter Byrne told him that “the paper trail showing Senator Feinstein’s conflict of interest is irrefutable.”

It may be irrefutable, but she almost got away without anyone even knowing what she was up to. Her colleagues on the subcommittee, for example, had no reason even to suspect that she knew what companies might benefit from her decisions because that information is routinely withheld to avoid favoritism. What they didn’t know was that her chief legal adviser, who also happened to be a business partner of her husband’s and the vice chairman of one of the companies involved, was secretly forwarding her lists of projects and appropriation requests that were coming before the committee and in which she and her husband had an interest — information that has only come to light recently as a result of the efforts of several California investigative reporters.

This adviser insists — apparently with a straight face — that he provided the information to Feinstein’s chief of staff so that she could recuse herself in cases where there might be a conflict. He says that he assumes she did so. The public record, however, indicates that she went right ahead and fought for these same projects.

During this period the two companies, URS of San Francisco and the Perini Corporation of Framingham, Mass., were controlled by Feinstein’s husband, Richard C. Blum, and were awarded a combined total of over $1.5 billion in government business thanks in large measure to her subcommittee. That’s a lot of money even here in Washington.

Interestingly, she left the subcommittee in late 2005 at about the same time her husband sold his stake in both companies. Their combined net worth increased that year with the sale of the two companies by some 25 percent, to more than $40 million.

In spite of the blatant appearance of corruption, no major publication has picked up on the story, the Senate Ethics Committee has reportedly let her slip by, and she is now chairing the Senate Rules Committee, which puts her in charge of making sure her colleagues act ethically and avoid the sorts of conflicts of interest with which she is personally and so obviously familiar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites





Geeeez, you're really grabbing straws when you can list only Feinstein's antics. Truth is.....George W. Bush's administration has proven to be the most corrupt, incompetent administration since that other great upstanding Republican, Richard Milhouse Nixon.... Even if there were more demos than Feinstein caught at corruption, you'd be hard pressed to even come close to the administration of Bush. :puke:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Geeeez, you're really grabbing straws when you can list only Feinstein's antics. Truth is.....George W. Bush's administration has proven to be the most corrupt, incompetent administration since that other great upstanding Republican, Richard Milhouse Nixon.... Even if there were more demos than Feinstein caught at corruption, you'd be hard pressed to even come close to the administration of Bush. :puke:

Clinton puts all to shame with his corrupt governance. He even made Nixon look amaturish.

But while you are at it, why is Fienstien's corruption not an issue with you? Other than being a Democrat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess corruption is lying about lying.

But not having thousands of dollars in the freezer?

What entity of the Bush administration has been convicted of being corrupt more than AT LEAST the same number of dims?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Geeeez, you're really grabbing straws when you can list only Feinstein's antics. Truth is.....George W. Bush's administration has proven to be the most corrupt, incompetent administration since that other great upstanding Republican, Richard Milhouse Nixon.... Even if there were more demos than Feinstein caught at corruption, you'd be hard pressed to even come close to the administration of Bush. :puke:

Clinton puts all to shame with his corrupt governance. He even made Nixon look amaturish.

But while you are at it, why is Fienstien's corruption not an issue with you? Other than being a Democrat.

We spent 80million investigating Clinton and all the Repugs could prove was that he liked oral sex. That was a safe bet at the outset.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Geeeez, you're really grabbing straws when you can list only Feinstein's antics. Truth is.....George W. Bush's administration has proven to be the most corrupt, incompetent administration since that other great upstanding Republican, Richard Milhouse Nixon.... Even if there were more demos than Feinstein caught at corruption, you'd be hard pressed to even come close to the administration of Bush. :puke:

Clinton puts all to shame with his corrupt governance. He even made Nixon look amaturish.

But while you are at it, why is Fienstien's corruption not an issue with you? Other than being a Democrat.

We spent 80million investigating Clinton and all the Repugs could prove was that he liked oral sex. That was a safe bet at the outset.

Sounds like the dims are too damn stupid to learn from the republicans' mistakes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Geeeez, you're really grabbing straws when you can list only Feinstein's antics. Truth is.....George W. Bush's administration has proven to be the most corrupt, incompetent administration since that other great upstanding Republican, Richard Milhouse Nixon.... Even if there were more demos than Feinstein caught at corruption, you'd be hard pressed to even come close to the administration of Bush. :puke:

Clinton puts all to shame with his corrupt governance. He even made Nixon look amaturish.

But while you are at it, why is Fienstien's corruption not an issue with you? Other than being a Democrat.

We spent 80million investigating Clinton and all the Repugs could prove was that he liked oral sex. That was a safe bet at the outset.

Sounds like the dims are too damn stupid to learn from the republicans' mistakes.

Well they also proved witness tampering and perjury but after all Clinton was a Democrat and therefore exempt. The MSM seems to have exempted Dims from all charges of corruption and only charge Repubs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Geeeez, you're really grabbing straws when you can list only Feinstein's antics. Truth is.....George W. Bush's administration has proven to be the most corrupt, incompetent administration since that other great upstanding Republican, Richard Milhouse Nixon.... Even if there were more demos than Feinstein caught at corruption, you'd be hard pressed to even come close to the administration of Bush. :puke:

You're full of it as usual, Shug. When it comes to corruption and scandal, no one, not even Tricky Dick Nixon can compare to the Clinton presidency. I agree, they are all corrupt (they are politicians, afterall) but your assertion of who has done the most wrong doesn't stand up to scruitny.

Let's take a look at the numbers, shall we?

Clinton has been the only president ever impeached on grounds of personal malfeasance. The most number of convictions and guilty pleas by friends and associates. The most number of cabinet officials to come under criminal investigation. The most number of witnesses to flee country or refuse to testify. The first president sued for sexual harassment and accused of rape (repeat offender). The largest criminal plea agreement in an illegal campaign contribution case. The first president to establish a legal defense fund. The greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions in presidential history, including illegal campaign contributions from abroad. Not to be outdone by her husband, Hillary was the first first lady to come under criminal investigation.

According to the internets, 40 government officials were indicted or convicted in the wake of Watergate. 31 convictions during the Reagan era (mostly Iran-Contra and the HUD mess). Now, ready for this one? 47 individuals and businesses associated with Saint Willy were convicted of or pleaded guilty to crimes. This doesn't take into account the number of people who took the 5th, hauled ass out of the country to avoid testifying, or just flat out refused to testify altogether.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...