arein0

Like I've been saying, it's because Bama has been shooting 70+% from 3. It's not a sustainable shooting percentage. To me, it's more telling that the team that is winning is having a less than average shooting night, at the same time the team that is losing is having a ridiculously good shooting half. In order for Bama to win, they are going to have to stop giving points in the paint. Whether that is baiting uconn into shooting more 3s, forcing more 3s, or get Clingan to pick up an early 3rd foul

The free throw discrepancy is based on how the teams play. Uconn plays inside out, meaning lots of paint touches and more chances for fouls. Bama plays outside in trying to pull everyone out of the lane when they drive.

You could also say that Uconn is due for a run. Bama is shooting 70% from 3 and still trailing. Hard to keep up that % for the whole game.

Dusty May just agreed to be Michigan's new coach

And now show the survey results post 2020

In the age where Trump can be president of the US, I would unfortunately say essentially nothing is immediately disqualifying at this point

The other thing is their interior defense is incredibly bad. So to counter that, they dare teams to shoot early 3s and try to turn the game into a 3 point contest with lots of quick shots.

They also recently released bitcoin etfs, making it more accessible.

Careful with that statement. Some on here believe that the unvetted info from social media is the only truth

If it's still there, of course. I won't depend on it but will gladly take it and pass it on to the next generation. But according to what coffee shared, I would die before I'm eligible

Yeah, I'm not sure I ever loved him.

If all continues to go according to plan, we will retire before 45

I would argue he is doing it for love of self

Hopefully no one invested. Already down 15-20% since the time this was posted

And they have to publicly release their financials

Twitter went private so we can no longer see their financials, but their last known reporting was a net income of -$270M in June '22

I would not trust investing in anything related to Trump. Let alone a SPAC. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/spac.asp What Are the Risks of a SPAC? An investor in a SPAC IPO trusts that promoters are successful in acquiring or merging with a suitable target company in the future. However, there exists a reduced degree of oversight from regulators and a lack of disclosure from the SPAC, burdening retail investors with the risk that the investment may be overhyped or even fraudulent.

Is it better than the 'I Never Had It Made' by Jackie Robinson?

https://www.hmd.org.uk/learn-about-the-holocaust-and-genocides/the-holocaust/the-camps/concentration-camps/

Both teams shot around the same free throw percentage. We shot 68.2% from the line while Yale shot 67.7%.

Absolutely

They have been saying that for quite some time.

It seems someone has missed the whole point of this post while simultaneously continuing the cycle

I don't consider 1 in 6 having infertility issues an anomaly. https://www.who.int/news/item/04-04-2023-1-in-6-people-globally-affected-by-infertility Also, any women over the age of 35 has a drastically lower chance of reproducing and at 51 basically all females are unable to reproduce. So no, what you are saying is not an anomaly like your example of a child born with one arm.