Jump to content

Your Stink, Your Swamp


RunInRed

Recommended Posts





  • Replies 55
  • Created
  • Last Reply
6 minutes ago, NolaAuTiger said:

Fox is a joke until they finally appease your fancy

More like when not even FNC can defend all Trump’s lies, you know it’s bad ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, RunInRed said:

More like when not even FNC can defend all Trump’s lies, you know it’s bad ...

Minute collateral. But you know I’m right ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, RunInRed said:

More like when not even FNC can defend all Trump’s lies, you know it’s bad ...

Impressive, FNC hammering him and he just keeps marching on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SaltyTiger said:

Impressive, FNC hammering him and he just keeps marching on.

For now ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, NolaAuTiger said:

Fox is a joke until they finally appease your fancy

Nah, overall its still a joke.  But it is nice to see some intellectual honesty coming from someone there besides Chris Wallace and Shep Smith.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Brad_ATX said:

Nah, overall its still a joke.  But it is nice to see some intellectual honesty coming from someone there besides Chris Wallace and Shep Smith.

It’s only “intellectual honesty” when it’s criticism.... right??? That furthers my point. 

I mean if they were to report the incredible unemployment rate for April, it would just be another thing to disregard. When Trump does well and the news reports it, it’s just Fox being his puppet. But when they tickle the other side’s ears, it’s “intellectual honesty.” Too selective. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, NolaAuTiger said:

It’s only “intellectual honesty” when it’s criticism.... right??? That furthers my point. 

I mean if they were to report the incredible unemployment rate for April, it would just be another thing to disregard. When Trump does well and the news reports it, it’s just Fox being his puppet. But when they tickle the other side’s ears, it’s “intellectual honesty.” Too selective. 

Well, to a degree, yes.  When a network becomes an nearly 100% reliable cheerleader for a politician, it is notable when actual criticism comes from one of their prominent members.  

Similarly, if MSNBC had Rachel Maddow do a segment where she praised Trump for something and gave him credit, it's more notable than when the sycophants at the Grab-em-by-the-p**** Network do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well this has to be it........heading to the WH......if I hurry I can see President Trump led out in handcuffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, NolaAuTiger said:

It’s only “intellectual honesty” when it’s criticism.... right??? That furthers my point. 

I mean if they were to report the incredible unemployment rate for April, it would just be another thing to disregard. When Trump does well and the news reports it, it’s just Fox being his puppet. But when they tickle the other side’s ears, it’s “intellectual honesty.” Too selective. 

There wasn't a single falsehood in that piece.  Whining about it doesn't change that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, homersapien said:

Condone factual reporting that is negative about Trump?   Absolutely.

 

 

Yeah. As long as it isn't transferring any acclaim to Trump. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, NolaAuTiger said:

Yeah. As long as it isn't transferring any acclaim to Trump. 

Haven't seen any facts that do that, just claims based on biased reasoning. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, homersapien said:

Haven't seen any facts that do that, just claims based on biased reasoning. 

From CNN - but I guess these aren't really "facts" are they? Stupid CNN

https://www.cnn.com/2018/04/27/politics/donald-trump-korea/index.html

Trump deserves credit for Korean thaw

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, NolaAuTiger said:

From CNN - but I guess these aren't really "facts" are they? Stupid CNN

https://www.cnn.com/2018/04/27/politics/donald-trump-korea/index.html

No, that isn't fact, it's opinion.  (I would have thought a law student could tell the difference.)

First, it hasn't happened yet.  Secondly, many reputable voices suspect Kim Jong Un is playing Trump for his own particular purpose - such as cementing his legitimacy in the eyes of the world.  They say there are many potential downsides to meeting with him.

Personally, I don't know. 

But I am not going to form an opinion until after the fact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, NolaAuTiger said:

It’s only “intellectual honesty” when it’s criticism.... right??? That furthers my point. 

I mean if they were to report the incredible unemployment rate for April, it would just be another thing to disregard. When Trump does well and the news reports it, it’s just Fox being his puppet. But when they tickle the other side’s ears, it’s “intellectual honesty.” Too selective. 

It doesn't further your point at all because you didn't make one.  You made an assumption.  Intellectual dishonesty happens when Fox consistently goes out of it's way to spin things in favor of Trump or outright ignore blatant falsehoods that the man states.  Cavuto called him out on it, which should be commended, because he's actually speaking truth.  Carlson and Hannity (especially Hannity) don't do that.

Also, this is the dumbest thing you've ever written:

"I mean if they were to report the incredible unemployment rate for April, it would just be another thing to disregard. When Trump does well and the news reports it, it’s just Fox being his puppet."

No, this is Fox doing it's job and reporting facts.  Wallace and Smith do this well and consistently over there.  Would be nice if their primary commentators stuck to the facts more often.  As was stated above by Titan, Cavuto's comments are getting attention because it's a rare thing to come from that network since Trump took office.

By the way, people like Maddow are just as dumb.  Remember her bombshell special on Trump's taxes?  Yeah, that was stupid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, NolaAuTiger said:

From CNN - but I guess these aren't really "facts" are they? Stupid CNN

https://www.cnn.com/2018/04/27/politics/donald-trump-korea/index.html

Trump deserves credit for Korean thaw

No.  The article clearly says "Analysis" at the top.  Read bro.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, homersapien said:

That's opinion, bro.

Exactly why I pointed out the word analysis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, homersapien said:

No, that isn't fact, it's opinion.  (I would have thought a law student could tell the difference.)

Sure it is a fact. Not trying to prove the content within, just that its there. The article speaks for itself. A law student actually knows that there's a very blurry line between fact and opinion, since you want to go there. (That's why the FRE permit lay opinions :))

 

10 minutes ago, homersapien said:

Secondly, many reputable voices suspect Kim Jong Un is playing Trump for his own particular purpose - such as cementing his legitimacy in the eyes of the world.  They say there are many potential downsides to meeting with him.

 

hahaha an no "reputable" voices say otherwise? 
 
12 minutes ago, homersapien said:

But I am not going to form an opinion until after the fact.

The world would be a better place if you approached Russia and Stormy Daniels the same way

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




×
×
  • Create New...