CDC Weighs in on vaccines vs immunity from infection

[pensacolatiger 313]

8 hours ago, DKW 86 said:

People I know, people I follow in the media are all starting to point to this effect. There just arent that many "virgin" infections anymore. We have entered the mature part of the pandemic and the overall story is going to change just based on the the population changing. IE: We didnt use to have almost ANYONE getting COVID for the 2nd or 3rd time before. Now, it's almost commonplace. Time does march on and things do change just due to maturing situation. My nephew, works at St Vincents, he is triple jabbed and he got COVID for a second time, The second time was almost not noticeable however but he did get it twice. The vaccines are not 100%, as was falsely said before. We now know better.

It’s funny to see the right was…..right all along.  Now comes the pivot from the left, oh we saw this coming, it’s the mature point of the pandemic

[AUFAN78 3,926]

[SLAG-91 1,483]

Gonna put this here...

That bastion of integrity, the CDC...:/

"The performance of vaccines and boosters, particularly in younger adults, is among the most glaring omissions in data the C.D.C. has made public.

Last year, the agency repeatedly came under fire for not tracking so-called breakthrough infections in vaccinated Americans, and focusing only on individuals who became ill enough to be hospitalized or die. The agency presented that information as risk comparisons with unvaccinated adults, rather than provide timely snapshots of hospitalized patients stratified by age, sex, race and vaccination status.

But the C.D.C. has been routinely collecting information since the Covid vaccines were first rolled out last year, according to a federal official familiar with the effort. The agency has been reluctant to make those figures public, the official said, because they might be misinterpreted as the vaccines being ineffective.

Ms. Nordlund confirmed that as one of the reasons."

...and they wonder why reasonable people are skeptical about any sort of proclamations they make. Started with "noble lies", and basically hasn't stopped.

 

[alexava 6,973]

9 hours ago, SLAG-91 said:

Gonna put this here...

That bastion of integrity, the CDC...:/

"The performance of vaccines and boosters, particularly in younger adults, is among the most glaring omissions in data the C.D.C. has made public.

Last year, the agency repeatedly came under fire for not tracking so-called breakthrough infections in vaccinated Americans, and focusing only on individuals who became ill enough to be hospitalized or die. The agency presented that information as risk comparisons with unvaccinated adults, rather than provide timely snapshots of hospitalized patients stratified by age, sex, race and vaccination status.

But the C.D.C. has been routinely collecting information since the Covid vaccines were first rolled out last year, according to a federal official familiar with the effort. The agency has been reluctant to make those figures public, the official said, because they might be misinterpreted as the vaccines being ineffective.

Ms. Nordlund confirmed that as one of the reasons."

...and they wonder why reasonable people are skeptical about any sort of proclamations they make. Started with "noble lies", and basically hasn't stopped.

 

Scandal.