TexasTiger 12,961 Posted March 19, 2007 Share Posted March 19, 2007 Other than me, that is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bottomfeeder 244 Posted March 20, 2007 Share Posted March 20, 2007 Michael Powell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GalensGhost 0 Posted March 20, 2007 Share Posted March 20, 2007 How bad is the injury? I thought he was going to be back before the fall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TexasTiger 12,961 Posted March 20, 2007 Author Share Posted March 20, 2007 How bad is the injury? I thought he was going to be back before the fall. I'm hearing it was a career ender. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bottomfeeder 244 Posted March 20, 2007 Share Posted March 20, 2007 Lying under oath tends to have that affect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AURaptor 1,125 Posted March 20, 2007 Share Posted March 20, 2007 Lying under oath tends to have that affect. Who said anything about Bill Clinton ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TexasTiger 12,961 Posted March 20, 2007 Author Share Posted March 20, 2007 Lying under oath tends to have that affect. Who said anything about Bill Clinton ? I don't think Bush is considering him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bottomfeeder 244 Posted March 20, 2007 Share Posted March 20, 2007 Lying under oath tends to have that affect. Who said anything about Bill Clinton ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
autigeremt 6,652 Posted March 20, 2007 Share Posted March 20, 2007 What's wrong bottomfeeder????? Is that another case of "white lie" v/s "big lie"? Either way, Clinton was guilty as charged! Tough to take, is'nt it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TexasTiger 12,961 Posted March 20, 2007 Author Share Posted March 20, 2007 What's wrong bottomfeeder????? Is that another case of "white lie" v/s "big lie"? Either way, Clinton was guilty as charged! Tough to take, is'nt it? Living in the past much? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AURaptor 1,125 Posted March 20, 2007 Share Posted March 20, 2007 What's wrong bottomfeeder????? Is that another case of "white lie" v/s "big lie"? Either way, Clinton was guilty as charged! Tough to take, is'nt it? Living in the past much? Funny you should bring that up. Echoes of Vietnam as Iraq protesters plan big marchTom Baldwin in Washington Protesters against the war in Iraq will assume today the mantle  if not the kaftans  of the radical generation before them who 40 years ago demonstrated against military involvement in Vietnam. The march marking the fourth anniversary of the Iraq invasion begins near the Vietnam Veterans’ Memorial Wall in Washington and will follow the same route across the Potomac River to the Pentagon taken by the antiwar protesters in 1967. Organisers say that then, as now, the war had reached a turning point with a majority of Americans opposing an escalating conflict. Opinion polls suggest that there is more support for bringing troops home from Iraq by the end of the year than there was for a swift withdrawal from Vietnam. But, just as with the Vietnam War, Iraq is opening up fissures between the Democratic Party and grassroots activists. Hillary Clinton, the frontrunner for the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination, is being continually hounded by the party’s Left over her refusal to apologise for her Senate vote five years ago authorising military action in Iraq. Even Democrats with impeccable antiwar credentials are becoming the focus of protesters, who claim that the congressional leadership is failing to act on the mandate given to it in November’s mid-term elections to end America’s military entanglement in Iraq. A peace camp has been set up outside the San Francisco home of Nancy Pelosi, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, while other leading Democrats have seen their Congressional offices occupied briefly by demonstrators Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TexasTiger 12,961 Posted March 20, 2007 Author Share Posted March 20, 2007 What's wrong bottomfeeder????? Is that another case of "white lie" v/s "big lie"? Either way, Clinton was guilty as charged! Tough to take, is'nt it? Living in the past much? Funny you should bring that up. Echoes of Vietnam as Iraq protesters plan big marchTom Baldwin in Washington Protesters against the war in Iraq will assume today the mantle  if not the kaftans  of the radical generation before them who 40 years ago demonstrated against military involvement in Vietnam. The march marking the fourth anniversary of the Iraq invasion begins near the Vietnam Veterans’ Memorial Wall in Washington and will follow the same route across the Potomac River to the Pentagon taken by the antiwar protesters in 1967. Organisers say that then, as now, the war had reached a turning point with a majority of Americans opposing an escalating conflict. Opinion polls suggest that there is more support for bringing troops home from Iraq by the end of the year than there was for a swift withdrawal from Vietnam. But, just as with the Vietnam War, Iraq is opening up fissures between the Democratic Party and grassroots activists. Hillary Clinton, the frontrunner for the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination, is being continually hounded by the party’s Left over her refusal to apologise for her Senate vote five years ago authorising military action in Iraq. Even Democrats with impeccable antiwar credentials are becoming the focus of protesters, who claim that the congressional leadership is failing to act on the mandate given to it in November’s mid-term elections to end America’s military entanglement in Iraq. A peace camp has been set up outside the San Francisco home of Nancy Pelosi, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, while other leading Democrats have seen their Congressional offices occupied briefly by demonstrators I wasn't there, but you do realize they are actually focused on a current war and current president, not a president from the previous century like you guys are, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AURaptor 1,125 Posted March 20, 2007 Share Posted March 20, 2007 What's wrong bottomfeeder????? Is that another case of "white lie" v/s "big lie"? Either way, Clinton was guilty as charged! Tough to take, is'nt it? Living in the past much? Funny you should bring that up. Echoes of Vietnam as Iraq protesters plan big marchTom Baldwin in Washington Protesters against the war in Iraq will assume today the mantle  if not the kaftans  of the radical generation before them who 40 years ago demonstrated against military involvement in Vietnam. The march marking the fourth anniversary of the Iraq invasion begins near the Vietnam Veterans’ Memorial Wall in Washington and will follow the same route across the Potomac River to the Pentagon taken by the antiwar protesters in 1967. Organisers say that then, as now, the war had reached a turning point with a majority of Americans opposing an escalating conflict. Opinion polls suggest that there is more support for bringing troops home from Iraq by the end of the year than there was for a swift withdrawal from Vietnam. But, just as with the Vietnam War, Iraq is opening up fissures between the Democratic Party and grassroots activists. Hillary Clinton, the frontrunner for the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination, is being continually hounded by the party’s Left over her refusal to apologise for her Senate vote five years ago authorising military action in Iraq. Even Democrats with impeccable antiwar credentials are becoming the focus of protesters, who claim that the congressional leadership is failing to act on the mandate given to it in November’s mid-term elections to end America’s military entanglement in Iraq. A peace camp has been set up outside the San Francisco home of Nancy Pelosi, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, while other leading Democrats have seen their Congressional offices occupied briefly by demonstrators I wasn't there, but you do realize they are actually focused on a current war and current president, not a president from the previous century like you guys are, right? I see you can't / won't read an article that doesn't agree with what you don't like. The protesters are re-living their glory days of 40 yrs ago with this irrational comparison between Iraq and 'nam. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TexasTiger 12,961 Posted March 20, 2007 Author Share Posted March 20, 2007 What's wrong bottomfeeder????? Is that another case of "white lie" v/s "big lie"? Either way, Clinton was guilty as charged! Tough to take, is'nt it? Living in the past much? Funny you should bring that up. Echoes of Vietnam as Iraq protesters plan big marchTom Baldwin in Washington Protesters against the war in Iraq will assume today the mantle  if not the kaftans  of the radical generation before them who 40 years ago demonstrated against military involvement in Vietnam. The march marking the fourth anniversary of the Iraq invasion begins near the Vietnam Veterans’ Memorial Wall in Washington and will follow the same route across the Potomac River to the Pentagon taken by the antiwar protesters in 1967. Organisers say that then, as now, the war had reached a turning point with a majority of Americans opposing an escalating conflict. Opinion polls suggest that there is more support for bringing troops home from Iraq by the end of the year than there was for a swift withdrawal from Vietnam. But, just as with the Vietnam War, Iraq is opening up fissures between the Democratic Party and grassroots activists. Hillary Clinton, the frontrunner for the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination, is being continually hounded by the party’s Left over her refusal to apologise for her Senate vote five years ago authorising military action in Iraq. Even Democrats with impeccable antiwar credentials are becoming the focus of protesters, who claim that the congressional leadership is failing to act on the mandate given to it in November’s mid-term elections to end America’s military entanglement in Iraq. A peace camp has been set up outside the San Francisco home of Nancy Pelosi, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, while other leading Democrats have seen their Congressional offices occupied briefly by demonstrators I wasn't there, but you do realize they are actually focused on a current war and current president, not a president from the previous century like you guys are, right? I see you can't / won't read an article that doesn't agree with what you don't like. The protesters are re-living their glory days of 40 yrs ago with this irrational comparison between Iraq and 'nam. I tell you can't distinguish between current reality and a writer's characterization/opinion. The fact remains, they're protesting another stupid decision that has resulted in another foreign policy mess. Funny how all the chickenhawks in the Bush adminstration that avoided Viet Nam failed to learn any of its lessons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GalensGhost 0 Posted March 20, 2007 Share Posted March 20, 2007 How bad is the injury? I thought he was going to be back before the fall. I'm hearing it was a career ender. We are talking about Oscar, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TexasTiger 12,961 Posted March 20, 2007 Author Share Posted March 20, 2007 How bad is the injury? I thought he was going to be back before the fall. I'm hearing it was a career ender. We are talking about Oscar, right? Nah, he should be fine by Fall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AURaptor 1,125 Posted March 20, 2007 Share Posted March 20, 2007 Funny how all the chickenhawks in the Bush adminstration that avoided Viet Nam failed to learn any of its lessons. Still living in the past, I see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TexasTiger 12,961 Posted March 20, 2007 Author Share Posted March 20, 2007 Funny how all the chickenhawks in the Bush adminstration that avoided Viet Nam failed to learn any of its lessons. Still living in the past, I see. I understand your need to avoid the original topic of this thread but if you want to talk about past presidents or aging hippies, stat your own thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiger in Spain 0 Posted March 20, 2007 Share Posted March 20, 2007 There is no point in the topic because Gonzales hasn't resigned (yet), therefore no one will be replacing him. Putting the cart before the horse, aren't we? If he does resign, I hope whoever takes his place is the toughest bastard ever to serve as AG. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AFTiger 282 Posted March 20, 2007 Share Posted March 20, 2007 What's wrong bottomfeeder????? Is that another case of "white lie" v/s "big lie"? Either way, Clinton was guilty as charged! Tough to take, is'nt it? Living in the past much? Irony defined Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SupperClub 0 Posted March 20, 2007 Share Posted March 20, 2007 If he does resign, I hope whoever takes his place is the toughest bastard ever to serve as AG. John Bolton? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiger in Spain 0 Posted March 20, 2007 Share Posted March 20, 2007 If he does resign, I hope whoever takes his place is the toughest bastard ever to serve as AG. John Bolton? How cool would that be! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tigermike 3,039 Posted March 20, 2007 Share Posted March 20, 2007 If he does resign, I hope whoever takes his place is the toughest bastard ever to serve as AG. John Bolton? Dude, that would really bother the dems since Bolton actually stood up for America. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.