Jump to content

Hillary's Troubles Mount


Proud Tiger

Recommended Posts

Is there any assertion so dumb and stupid that Raptor won't double down on it?

I say no.

Agreed.

And I'm coming from the perspective that Hillary is literally one of the worst candidates out there. Aside from disagreement on her policy positions, I simply think she's completely untrustworthy. I believe she'd lie at the drop of a hat if it would save her own butt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites





  • Replies 55
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Unproven ? It's no secret that the Left, ( understand, I mean a large majority, if not every single living , breathing, card carrying member ) has adored and praised Hillary for her brilliance. I trust you're not going to quibble over THAT too, are you ?

You're moving the goalposts. Many on the Left probably do thinks she's very intelligent. But the statement was "smartest woman on the planet." And that has not been proven to be the view of those on the Left, or to be a quote that even originated from the Left.

Dan Rostenkowski was a Democrat, was he not ?

And it need not have been that exact quote for the general feeling to be valid.

Because if you are, then I'm just wasting my time.

If am, at least you know how the rest of this board feels 90% of the time you post anything.

Funny, you whine about absolute specifics and detailing citation for facts, but then pull this % out of your... hat.

Trust me, I really don't care what 9 or 90 % think. I'm all about facts, and if you don't like them, or they make you uncomfortable, that's your problem, not mine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unproven ? It's no secret that the Left, ( understand, I mean a large majority, if not every single living , breathing, card carrying member ) has adored and praised Hillary for her brilliance. I trust you're not going to quibble over THAT too, are you ?

Because if you are, then I'm just wasting my time.

Only a ideologue hater would claim she's not intelligent, ( This was unbelievably dumb on her part. - The closest anyone here has suggesting she's not intelligent was you , not I ) but I know no one who would ever say she's the smartest woman in the world. ( Absense of evidence is not evidence of absense. Just because YOU are unaware of it doesn't mean it doesn't exist ) You feel the need to ascribe adoration of Dems to those on your left. If she was as loved as you think, she'd have been elected in 2008.( Trust me, those Hillary fans are pissed that Obama showed up out of no where. That was suppose to be HER coronation, not his. But this time, " she's ready ! " )

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there any assertion so dumb and stupid that Raptor won't double down on it?

I say no.

Agreed.

And I'm coming from the perspective that Hillary is literally one of the worst candidates out there. Aside from disagreement on her policy positions, I simply think she's completely untrustworthy. I believe she'd lie at the drop of a hat if it would save her own butt.

I think you pretty much just described the field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unproven ? It's no secret that the Left, ( understand, I mean a large majority, if not every single living , breathing, card carrying member ) has adored and praised Hillary for her brilliance. I trust you're not going to quibble over THAT too, are you ?

Because if you are, then I'm just wasting my time.

Only a ideologue hater would claim she's not intelligent, ( This was unbelievably dumb on her part. - The closest anyone here has suggesting she's not intelligent was you , not I ) but I know no one who would ever say she's the smartest woman in the world. ( Absense of evidence is not evidence of absense. Just because YOU are unaware of it doesn't mean it doesn't exist ) You feel the need to ascribe adoration of Dems to those on your left. If she was as loved as you think, she'd have been elected in 2008.( Trust me, those Hillary fans are pissed that Obama showed up out of no where. That was suppose to be HER coronation, not his. But this time, " she's ready ! " )

Almost the entire left says something, even though there's no evidence they do, doesn't mean most don't say it. Got it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unproven ? It's no secret that the Left, ( understand, I mean a large majority, if not every single living , breathing, card carrying member ) has adored and praised Hillary for her brilliance. I trust you're not going to quibble over THAT too, are you ?

Because if you are, then I'm just wasting my time.

Only a ideologue hater would claim she's not intelligent, ( This was unbelievably dumb on her part. - The closest anyone here has suggesting she's not intelligent was you , not I ) but I know no one who would ever say she's the smartest woman in the world. ( Absense of evidence is not evidence of absense. Just because YOU are unaware of it doesn't mean it doesn't exist ) You feel the need to ascribe adoration of Dems to those on your left. If she was as loved as you think, she'd have been elected in 2008.( Trust me, those Hillary fans are pissed that Obama showed up out of no where. That was suppose to be HER coronation, not his. But this time, " she's ready ! " )

Almost the entire left says something, even though there's no evidence they do, doesn't mean most don't say it. Got it.

lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unproven ? It's no secret that the Left, ( understand, I mean a large majority, if not every single living , breathing, card carrying member ) has adored and praised Hillary for her brilliance. I trust you're not going to quibble over THAT too, are you ?

Because if you are, then I'm just wasting my time.

Only a ideologue hater would claim she's not intelligent, ( This was unbelievably dumb on her part. - The closest anyone here has suggesting she's not intelligent was you , not I ) but I know no one who would ever say she's the smartest woman in the world. ( Absense of evidence is not evidence of absense. Just because YOU are unaware of it doesn't mean it doesn't exist ) You feel the need to ascribe adoration of Dems to those on your left. If she was as loved as you think, she'd have been elected in 2008.( Trust me, those Hillary fans are pissed that Obama showed up out of no where. That was suppose to be HER coronation, not his. But this time, " she's ready ! " )

Almost the entire left says something, even though there's no evidence they do, doesn't mean most don't say it. Got it.

You ignoring it or wanting it to not be doesn't make it go away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unproven ? It's no secret that the Left, ( understand, I mean a large majority, if not every single living , breathing, card carrying member ) has adored and praised Hillary for her brilliance. I trust you're not going to quibble over THAT too, are you ?

Because if you are, then I'm just wasting my time.

Only a ideologue hater would claim she's not intelligent, ( This was unbelievably dumb on her part. - The closest anyone here has suggesting she's not intelligent was you , not I ) but I know no one who would ever say she's the smartest woman in the world. ( Absense of evidence is not evidence of absense. Just because YOU are unaware of it doesn't mean it doesn't exist ) You feel the need to ascribe adoration of Dems to those on your left. If she was as loved as you think, she'd have been elected in 2008.( Trust me, those Hillary fans are pissed that Obama showed up out of no where. That was suppose to be HER coronation, not his. But this time, " she's ready ! " )

Almost the entire left says something, even though there's no evidence they do, doesn't mean most don't say it. Got it.

You ignoring it or wanting it to not be doesn't make it go away.

I wish that worked with your posts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TexasTiger - me proving you wrong must really ruin your day, huh?

Good.

:roflol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TexasTiger - me proving you wrong must really ruin your day, huh?

Good.

:roflol:/>

You really grasp the consensus opinion on this thread, don't you? ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The people's consensus in several latest polls is they don't trust Hillary. People are catching open to her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The people's consensus in several latest polls is they don't trust Hillary. People are catching open to her.

Can you explain the meaning of this sentence?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The people's consensus in several latest polls is they don't trust Hillary. People are catching open to her.

They don't trust her and still prefer her. They didn't trust Bill, either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Texas, you're worried about consensus when I've just flat out proven you to be wrong. Now have a great day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Texas, you're worried about consensus when I've just flat out proven you to be wrong. Now have a great day.

You are a deeply disturbed person.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Texas, if anyone is OCD that would be you. You made 2 false claims minimum , that I was delusional and made something up. Both of those are categorically wrong. If you want to hang your hat on the whole left not thinking about Hillary as the smartest woman in the world, then have at it. But it's already been in an established meme in politics for 20 years. Get over it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TT...you say they don't trust her but prefer her? I guess that means her followers are delusional.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TT...you say they don't trust her but prefer her? I guess that means her followers are delusional.

More likely disgusted with the alternative or realistic about politicians.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really? How screwed up up do you have to be to say you want a leader you don't trust. Without trust there is no leadership...there is only coercion and bought favors. Trust 1st, competence second; after that nothing else much really matters when looking at leaders.... Glad to hear that Hillary now fails on both accounts....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really? How screwed up up do you have to be to say you want a leader you don't trust. Without trust there is no leadership...there is only coercion and bought favors. Trust 1st, competence second; after that nothing else much really matters when looking at leaders.... Glad to hear that Hillary now fails on both accounts....

Sounds great. You trusted W? Whom do you trust now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I trust Bernie to be a full blown socialist. At least he's honest about it, unlike tyrannical Hillary .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TT....I would follow W into battle. Hillary.......no way. She would get my ass killed and say "what difference does it make."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there any assertion so dumb and stupid that Raptor won't double down on it?

I say no.

Agreed.

And I'm coming from the perspective that Hillary is literally one of the worst candidates out there. Aside from disagreement on her policy positions, I simply think she's completely untrustworthy. I believe she'd lie at the drop of a hat if it would save her own butt.

I think you pretty much just described the field.

I think she's a bigger liar than most.

And I don't think the whole field has that as a default switch. Kasich doesn't strike me as dishonest. I don't think Bernie Sanders is dishonest as a general rule. Huckabee doesn't strike me that way either. I don't know enough about others. But Hillary I think is basically in a default mode of being deceptive. If Trump isn't putting on a show, he's scarier than I thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there any assertion so dumb and stupid that Raptor won't double down on it?

I say no.

How trustworthy did you find Romney? Ryan?

Agreed.

And I'm coming from the perspective that Hillary is literally one of the worst candidates out there. Aside from disagreement on her policy positions, I simply think she's completely untrustworthy. I believe she'd lie at the drop of a hat if it would save her own butt.

I think you pretty much just described the field.

I think she's a bigger liar than most.

And I don't think the whole field has that as a default switch. Kasich doesn't strike me as dishonest. I don't think Bernie Sanders is dishonest as a general rule. Huckabee doesn't strike me that way either. I don't know enough about others. But Hillary I think is basically in a default mode of being deceptive. If Trump isn't putting on a show, he's scarier than I thought.

How trustworthy did you find Romney? Ryan?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there any assertion so dumb and stupid that Raptor won't double down on it?

I say no.

How trustworthy did you find Romney? Ryan?

Agreed.

And I'm coming from the perspective that Hillary is literally one of the worst candidates out there. Aside from disagreement on her policy positions, I simply think she's completely untrustworthy. I believe she'd lie at the drop of a hat if it would save her own butt.

I think you pretty much just described the field.

I think she's a bigger liar than most.

And I don't think the whole field has that as a default switch. Kasich doesn't strike me as dishonest. I don't think Bernie Sanders is dishonest as a general rule. Huckabee doesn't strike me that way either. I don't know enough about others. But Hillary I think is basically in a default mode of being deceptive. If Trump isn't putting on a show, he's scarier than I thought.

How trustworthy did you find Romney? Ryan?

Romney...very little. Ryan, a bit more. I think he's undergone some interesting transformation the last couple of years though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




×
×
  • Create New...