AUUSN 823 Posted February 4, 2017 Author Share Posted February 4, 2017 6 minutes ago, AURaptor said: Yeah, that sucker punch really crushed him, huh? Lefties be like - " Free speech sucks! Sucker punchin' and violence is COOL ! " When you're a sh.. talking shock jock, don't be surprised when someone cleans your clock. He goes looking for shock entertainment and that day he found more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AURaptor 1,125 Posted February 5, 2017 Share Posted February 5, 2017 41 minutes ago, AUUSN said: When you're a sh.. talking shock jock, don't be surprised when someone cleans your clock. He goes looking for shock entertainment and that day he found more. Yay! More pro violence ! All he does is dish out truth. Snowflakes who can't handle it lash out , like spoiled children being told there is no more dessert. WAHH!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUUSN 823 Posted February 5, 2017 Author Share Posted February 5, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUUSN 823 Posted February 6, 2017 Author Share Posted February 6, 2017 The rest of the 84 lumber commercial censored by Fox. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GiveEmElle 1,559 Posted February 6, 2017 Share Posted February 6, 2017 2 hours ago, AUUSN said: The rest of the 84 lumber commercial censored by Fox. Love it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metafour 4,969 Posted February 6, 2017 Share Posted February 6, 2017 Just LOL at companies using brainless Lefties to buy some quick brownie points. I think they missed the part of the journey where the woman and her child are raped by Mexican criminals. Happy illegal border crossing otherwise though! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUUSN 823 Posted February 10, 2017 Author Share Posted February 10, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUUSN 823 Posted February 10, 2017 Author Share Posted February 10, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUUSN 823 Posted February 10, 2017 Author Share Posted February 10, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AURaptor 1,125 Posted February 10, 2017 Share Posted February 10, 2017 Why does the Left HATE America ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUUSN 823 Posted February 10, 2017 Author Share Posted February 10, 2017 Trump: SEE YOU IN COURT. 9th Circuit: We are a court. Trump: Fake News!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
japantiger 4,051 Posted February 10, 2017 Share Posted February 10, 2017 12 hours ago, AUUSN said: Trump: SEE YOU IN COURT. 9th Circuit: We are a court. Trump: Fake News!!! Isn't the 9th Circuit the same court that ruled we don't have a constitutional right to own guns? These guys aren't a court, there a Democrat encounter group....here's to seeing them uphold their record as the most reversed court... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AURaptor 1,125 Posted February 10, 2017 Share Posted February 10, 2017 7 minutes ago, japantiger said: Isn't the 9th Circuit the same court that ruled we don't have a constitutional right to own guns? These guys aren't a court, there a Democrat encounter group....here's to seeing them uphold their record as the most reversed court... 80 % overturned rate at the USSC level. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TexasTiger 12,966 Posted February 10, 2017 Share Posted February 10, 2017 1 hour ago, AURaptor said: 80 % overturned rate at the USSC level. A little perspective: "From 1999 to 2008, of the 0.151% of Ninth Circuit Court rulings that were reviewed by the Supreme Court, 20% were affirmed, 19% were vacated, and 61% were reversed; the median reversal rate for all federal appellate courts was 68.29% for the same period.[7]" https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Ninth_Circuit#Rate_of_overturned_decisions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WDavE 332 Posted February 10, 2017 Share Posted February 10, 2017 With an average like that you would be sent down to double A ball. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AURaptor 1,125 Posted February 10, 2017 Share Posted February 10, 2017 13 minutes ago, TexasTiger said: A little perspective: "From 1999 to 2008, of the 0.151% of Ninth Circuit Court rulings that were reviewed by the Supreme Court, 20% were affirmed, 19% were vacated, and 61% were reversed; the median reversal rate for all federal appellate courts was 68.29% for the same period.[7]" https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Ninth_Circuit#Rate_of_overturned_decisions Why just cherry pick a 10 year span ? Which was nine years ago? Statscan be manipulated Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TexasTiger 12,966 Posted February 10, 2017 Share Posted February 10, 2017 1 hour ago, AURaptor said: Why just cherry pick a 10 year span ? Which was nine years ago? Statscan be manipulated Can you please link to a more recent source if that's what you're citing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUUSN 823 Posted February 10, 2017 Author Share Posted February 10, 2017 Muslim U.S. Olympian Ibtihaj Muhammad says she was held by U.S. Customs http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/olympics/2017/02/08/olympic-fencer-ibtihaj-muhammad-held-us-customs-trump-travel-ban/97676170/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muslim U.S. Olympian Ibtihaj Muhammad says she was held by U.S. Customs http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/olympics/2017/02/08/olympic-fencer-ibtihaj-muhammad-held-us-customs-trump-travel-ban/97676170/
AURaptor 1,125 Posted February 10, 2017 Share Posted February 10, 2017 1 hour ago, AUUSN said: Muslim U.S. Olympian Ibtihaj Muhammad says she was held by U.S. Customs http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/olympics/2017/02/08/olympic-fencer-ibtihaj-muhammad-held-us-customs-trump-travel-ban/97676170/ So what ? Ted Kennedy was on the No-Fly list ( but not his nephew ? ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muslim U.S. Olympian Ibtihaj Muhammad says she was held by U.S. Customs http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/olympics/2017/02/08/olympic-fencer-ibtihaj-muhammad-held-us-customs-trump-travel-ban/97676170/
AUUSN 823 Posted February 10, 2017 Author Share Posted February 10, 2017 8 hours ago, japantiger said: Isn't the 9th Circuit the same court that ruled we don't have a constitutional right to own guns? These guys aren't a court, there a Democrat encounter group....here's to seeing them uphold their record as the most reversed court... Thursday night: SEE YOU IN COURT! Friday night: SEE YOU IN COURT? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUUSN 823 Posted February 10, 2017 Author Share Posted February 10, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WDavE 332 Posted February 10, 2017 Share Posted February 10, 2017 22 minutes ago, AUUSN said: Thursday night: SEE YOU IN COURT! Friday night: SEE YOU IN COURT? Do you think the longer this plays out the less likely it will happen? That would be very foolish. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUUSN 823 Posted February 10, 2017 Author Share Posted February 10, 2017 3 minutes ago, WDavE said: Do you think the longer this plays out the less likely it will happen? That would be very foolish. He will rewrite another order this weekend AND fight the lower court in WA to save face. When I say he, I mean his lawyers....he'll be busy holding the Japan's PM hand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUUSN 823 Posted February 10, 2017 Author Share Posted February 10, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUUSN 823 Posted February 11, 2017 Author Share Posted February 11, 2017 Why a Travel Restriction Won't Stop Terrorism at Home Most of these plots and attacks — 105 out of 147 — were planned by U.S. citizens. Another 20 of the plotters were legal permanent residents, most of whom arrived in the United States as children. In other words, 85 percent of the terrorists lived in the U.S a long time before carrying out an attack — they radicalized within the nation's borders. A total of 89 people died in the jihadist attacks. Every one of these deaths was needless and tragic. However, the added risk to public safety in a country that averages 15,000 homicides a year was statistically minuscule. The republic is not in peril. What is at work here is terrorism — acts of violence calculated to create fear and alarm. It is often effective. Terrorism can also act as a condenser of society's broader anxieties. Illegal immigration has caused widespread concern, which amplifies the perceived terrorist threat. Had this temporary prohibition been in effect since 9/11, how many lives would have been saved? Not one. None of the fatalities resulted from attacks by individuals from the seven countries named in the directive. The directive also would not have prevented the 9/11 attacks. This is not an argument for adding to the list of proscribed countries. http://www.rand.org/blog/2017/02/why-a-travel-restriction-wont-stop-terrorism-at-home.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Why a Travel Restriction Won't Stop Terrorism at Home Most of these plots and attacks — 105 out of 147 — were planned by U.S. citizens. Another 20 of the plotters were legal permanent residents, most of whom arrived in the United States as children. In other words, 85 percent of the terrorists lived in the U.S a long time before carrying out an attack — they radicalized within the nation's borders. A total of 89 people died in the jihadist attacks. Every one of these deaths was needless and tragic. However, the added risk to public safety in a country that averages 15,000 homicides a year was statistically minuscule. The republic is not in peril. What is at work here is terrorism — acts of violence calculated to create fear and alarm. It is often effective. Terrorism can also act as a condenser of society's broader anxieties. Illegal immigration has caused widespread concern, which amplifies the perceived terrorist threat. Had this temporary prohibition been in effect since 9/11, how many lives would have been saved? Not one. None of the fatalities resulted from attacks by individuals from the seven countries named in the directive. The directive also would not have prevented the 9/11 attacks. This is not an argument for adding to the list of proscribed countries. http://www.rand.org/blog/2017/02/why-a-travel-restriction-wont-stop-terrorism-at-home.html
Most of these plots and attacks — 105 out of 147 — were planned by U.S. citizens. Another 20 of the plotters were legal permanent residents, most of whom arrived in the United States as children. In other words, 85 percent of the terrorists lived in the U.S a long time before carrying out an attack — they radicalized within the nation's borders. A total of 89 people died in the jihadist attacks. Every one of these deaths was needless and tragic. However, the added risk to public safety in a country that averages 15,000 homicides a year was statistically minuscule. The republic is not in peril. What is at work here is terrorism — acts of violence calculated to create fear and alarm. It is often effective. Terrorism can also act as a condenser of society's broader anxieties. Illegal immigration has caused widespread concern, which amplifies the perceived terrorist threat. Had this temporary prohibition been in effect since 9/11, how many lives would have been saved? Not one. None of the fatalities resulted from attacks by individuals from the seven countries named in the directive. The directive also would not have prevented the 9/11 attacks. This is not an argument for adding to the list of proscribed countries. http://www.rand.org/blog/2017/02/why-a-travel-restriction-wont-stop-terrorism-at-home.html
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.