Jump to content

Lemon Test overturned.


Didba

Recommended Posts

Lemon was used for cases to determine where the entanglement of church and state violated the establishment clause.

Link to comment
Share on other sites





Yeah this deserves its own thread. 

The court's opinion is an exercise in bad faith jurisprudence. 

Not that schools didn't have to be careful before, but now they have to tiptoe through landmines. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Lemon Test was already excessively vague. I'm more middle of the road with regard to this decision.  In some ways, it will make public schools and governments less open to litigation.  I see that as a positive in some ways.  I have seen this used against school districts for little reason other than harassment at times.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, AU9377 said:

The Lemon Test was already excessively vague. I'm more middle of the road with regard to this decision.  In some ways, it will make public schools and governments less open to litigation.  I see that as a positive in some ways.  I have seen this used against school districts for little reason other than harassment at times.

The issue is it is vague for school officials, but not vague for lawyers.  For myself, I know exactly what an infraction of the lemon test looks like.  I have read thousands of examples of when it was or was not violated. School officials don't.  I love the test, I can see why school officials don't. Still IMO from the lawyer perspective it was good jurisprudence.  It gave a black letter test (at least for us) to use.

 

I will add no doubt it is vague, however, the test was just taught so well by law schools for so long (and undergrad mind you, the first time I heard the lemon test was at auburn for my PoliSci degree), compared to other "tests" for the freedom of religion doctrine it is basically black letter law.  I mean what the hell does proselytizing religion mean? That's as vague as it gets.

Edited by Didba
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, AU9377 said:

The Lemon Test was already excessively vague. 

You think it's vague just wait for the forthcoming "history and traditions" test 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SaltyTiger said:

What is “history and traditions” test?

I was making a joke, Salty. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AUDub said:

I was making a joke, Salty. 

You joke but that's actually a rationale that has been used before by conservative justices in dissents

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Didba said:

You joke but that's actually a rationale that has been used before by conservative justices in dissents

Yeah. Hence the PDF. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, AUDub said:

Yeah. Hence the PDF. 

I hadn't clicked on it yet, my bad

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Didba said:

You joke but that's actually a rationale that has been used before by conservative justices in dissents

I wouldn't say a rationale, but certainly an element to their argument, yes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Didba said:

The issue is it is vague for school officials, but not vague for lawyers.  For myself, I know exactly what an infraction of the lemon test looks like.  I have read thousands of examples of when it was or was not violated. School officials don't.  I love the test, I can see why school officials don't. Still IMO from the lawyer perspective it was good jurisprudence.  It gave a black letter test (at least for us) to use.

 

I will add no doubt it is vague, however, the test was just taught so well by law schools for so long (and undergrad mind you, the first time I heard the lemon test was at auburn for my PoliSci degree), compared to other "tests" for the freedom of religion doctrine it is basically black letter law.  I mean what the hell does proselytizing religion mean? That's as vague as it gets.

It was well established, but of all the issues this new majority was likely to tackle, this one actually surprises me the least.  Applying that test in the 5th(Louisiana/Texas/MS) and 11th (Ga/AL/FL) circuits often produces different results than the same application with the same set of facts from the 9th (CA etc) or 2nd(NY).  I'll admit, I don't completely disagree with Gorsuch's analysis on this. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, AU9377 said:

He was being sarcastic. 

Dubs informed. Would have asked you or Didba but lawyers are hard to understand and make me nervous. Have a son that is a lawyer. Speak to him rarely and never ask him a question. 😏

Edited by SaltyTiger
  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, AU9377 said:

It was well established, but of all the issues this new majority was likely to tackle, this one actually surprises me the least.  Applying that test in the 5th(Louisiana/Texas/MS) and 11th (Ga/AL/FL) circuits often produces different results than the same application with the same set of facts from the 9th (CA etc) or 2nd(NY).  I'll admit, I don't completely disagree with Gorsuch's analysis on this. 

You know what's wild is this bar exam I'm about to take is the last one that will test on abortions and the establishment clause. The lemon test was great for MBE questions

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Didba said:

You know what's wild is this bar exam I'm about to take is the last one that will test on abortions and the establishment clause. The lemon test was great for MBE questions

It does lend itself to that format.  I don't remember it being on the exam in 1996 when I took it, but then again, I probably don't remember a lot of things from that year.  I was one of the last classes allowed to take the exam prior to graduation if I chose to do so.  I didn't think about the fact that Mardi Gras was the week before the February exam that year (I was in school at Tulane).  It worked out fine in the end, but the drive to Atlanta was long after having gone out with friends a few too many nights.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, AU9377 said:

It does lend itself to that format.  I don't remember it being on the exam in 1996 when I took it, but then again, I probably don't remember a lot of things from that year.  I was one of the last classes allowed to take the exam prior to graduation if I chose to do so.  I didn't think about the fact that Mardi Gras was the week before the February exam that year (I was in school at Tulane).  It worked out fine in the end, but the drive to Atlanta was long after having gone out with friends a few too many nights.

My god that sounds terrible, my testing center is only twenty minutes away luckily. Also mind blowing that you took it in the middle of your last semester!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, SaltyTiger said:

Dubs informed. Would have asked you or Didba but lawyers are hard to understand and make me nervous. Have a son that is a lawyer. Speak to him rarely and never ask him a question. 😏

Too many in the profession are condescending ass hats.  Even if we disagree about something, never be apprehensive about asking a question.  I never intend to belittle someone's opinion or view.  I'm certainly not always right and if I actually did know everything, the last thing I would be doing is practicing law. 

At the end of the day, we are all just people with differing backgrounds and life experiences.  Sharing those life experiences with each other is the only way we grow.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Didba said:

My god that sounds terrible, my testing center is only twenty minutes away luckily. Also mind blowing that you took it in the middle of your last semester!!

I left out the fact that I also had a murder trial in January through our clinical program.  How I did all that actually amazes me today, given that a month now flies by at the speed of light.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, SaltyTiger said:

Dubs informed. Would have asked you or Didba but lawyers are hard to understand and make me nervous. Have a son that is a lawyer. Speak to him rarely and never ask him a question. 😏

Do y’all agree on most political issues?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...