Tigermike 4,084 Posted August 17, 2007 Share Posted August 17, 2007 Democrats and CannibalsThe Kos kids try but fail to devour party moderates. BY KIMBERLEY A. STRASSEL Friday, August 17, 2007 12:01 a.m. Texas Democrat Henry Cuellar is today fond of quoting a famous Lyndon Johnson line: "You know the difference between cannibals and liberals? Cannibals only eat their enemies." Mr. Cuellar would know, having found himself the main course on liberals' election menu just last year. A centrist Democrat who is pro-business, free-trade and strong on law enforcement, the congressman was designated an apostate by the left-wing Netroots crowd. They decamped to his district and bankrolled a liberal primary challenger. Mr. Cuellar triumphed, though Daily Kos founder Markos Moulitsas would later swagger on his blog: "So we didn't kill off Cuellar. But we gave him a whooping where none was expected and made him sweat." Which is the point. If the liberal blogging phenomenon deserves to be known for anything, it is the strategy to intimidate or silence anyone who disagrees with its own out-of-the-mainstream views. That muzzling has been on full display in recent weeks as Mr. Moulitsas and fellow online speech police have launched a campaign against the centrist Democratic Leadership Council. DLC Chairman Harold Ford, Jr. was even thwacked last week for daring to speak to this editorial page (my sincere apologies, Mr. Ford)--the clear goal to discourage him from making such a free-speech mistake again. Yet a lively midweek chat with Mr. Cuellar suggests that this campaign of threats isn't necessarily having the intended effect. If anything, it might be backfiring. "They win when they intimidate people," says Mr. Cuellar. "I've taken everything they've thrown, plus their kitchen sink, and I still stand proud as a moderate-conservative Democrat." He says his triumph over blogger fire has only strengthened his conviction that his party will only win elections if it continues to be a "big tent" open to all views. "To make that tent smaller, to force people--not to persuade, but to force, because these are threats--to quiet down, that's destructive in the long term and the short term." Mr. Cuellar's 2006 victory may be the truest proof of those words. While many of the Democrats' toughest races were fought in conservative-leaning districts, Mr. Cuellar hails from the 28th, a Democratic area near San Antonio, home to many border towns and a significant Hispanic population. Liberal bloggers may have thought they'd have an easy time turning the Texan into an example of what happens to "traitors" to their cause. They mounted a spendy campaign behind the more liberal Ciro Rodriguez, who'd only lost by 203 votes to Mr. Cuellar in 2004. Instead, Democrats, Independents and even Republicans rallied around the incumbent, who had impressed them with his support for the Central America Free Trade Agreement, his push to reform the public-school system and his pro-business stance. This time, Mr. Cuellar beat Mr. Rodriguez in the primary 53% to 41%, and then went on to get 68% of the general-election vote. "They poured out negative ads and hundreds of thousands of dollars, but in the end I knew my district a lot better than they did." Despite all the blogger bravado that they now run the show, Mr. Cuellar's experience has been more the norm than the exception. The press may adore them, but the Netroots simply haven't notched many concrete victories. "Every time I see [sen.] Joe Lieberman in the hall, we like to say 'we're still here, aren't we?'" says Mr. Cuellar, a spunky tone in his voice. California's Jane Harman, reviled as a "warmonger," last year whipped antiwar activist Marcy Winograd in a primary, 62%-38%. Ellen Tauscher, who heads the New Democrat Coalition in Congress, was savaged by left-wing blogs for her votes authorizing Iraq and free trade, and in particular for her warning to her party not to "go off the left cliff." She walked away from her re-election with 66% of the vote. Mr. Cuellar goes so far as to argue that instead of cowing Democratic moderates, the left-wing attacks have united them. More middle-of-the-roaders now believe that if the bloggers were to win a high-profile primary, it would only energize them to go after others. "This has brought us together to say, 'this is us, and we've got to stick together,'" he says. But perhaps the Netroots biggest failure, suggests Mr. Cuellar, is that it hasn't bludgeoned his party's leadership into abandoning the middle. It was moderate Democrats who won their party the majority last year (the New Democrats now boast 60 members; 13 new additions), and Mr. Cuellar claims few people understand that better than Speaker Nancy Pelosi. "I've seen her behind the scenes, and I've always thought she was liberal, but she's done a good job of trying to bring us more to the middle." For proof, Mr. Cuellar suggests a look at "all the passes" the leadership has given red-state Dems on tough votes like Iraq, missile defense and immigration. This is an obvious recognition by the top ranks of the party that getting moderates re-elected is the only way to stay in power. They know that "if we go the way these Internet groups want us to go, we'll be the shortest-lived majority in congressional history," he says. Don't take this to mean that the liberal juggernaut hasn't shifted the debate. Some moderate Democrats, while reticent to admit it, are tacking left in hopes of dodging further assaults. Ms. Tauscher, long known for her national security credentials, has toned down her hawkish impulses, voting against the recent surge and taking a harder line on missile defense. Even Mr. Ford's DLC these days seems a little more comfortable talking about "trade enforcement" than it does "free trade." Mr. Cuellar admits that while some centrists are willing to say "who the . . . blank-blank do [these Internet groups] think they are," others don't want "to be the center of the attraction." In a match-up on "Meet the Press" this past weekend, the Daily Kos's Mr. Moulitsas extolled those who use his site to trash thoughtful folks such as Mr. Cuellar as a shining example of "democracy." In the same breath he then commanded the DLC's Mr. Ford to "control" his moderate members, and force them to stop disagreeing with liberal Democrats. If you get that logic, you might just be a Daily Kos reader. Mr. Cuellar, for his part, doesn't show much of an inclination to be controlled by anything other than his own principles. And he's trumped the hungry liberals--so far. Ms. Strassel is a member of The Wall Street Journal's editorial board, based in Washington. Her column appears Fridays. http://www.opinionjournal.com/columnists/k...w/?id=110010486 Link to comment https://www.aufamily.com/topic/39484-netroots-trying-to-devour-moderate-dems/ Share on other sites More sharing options...
otterinbham 0 Posted August 18, 2007 Share Posted August 18, 2007 Yet, if the Democrats do indeed lose the White House in 2008 (Which is a distinct possibility despite the present administration), the left wing of the Democrats will think the loss will be due to the party not being far enough to the left. To be honest with you, if Kerry had show a modest amount of interest in national security issues he would be in the Oval Office right now. Link to comment https://www.aufamily.com/topic/39484-netroots-trying-to-devour-moderate-dems/#findComment-396371 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.