rocketman37 13 Posted September 23, 2011 Share Posted September 23, 2011 I'm still seething and teeming over the cute and sarcastic innuendo POINT AFTER, "More Perfect Unions", Phil Taylor, Page 88): "...soliciting payment under the table-like Cam Newton's dad did at Auburn...". My email message ("...alledgedly solicited....from MISSISSIPPI STATE, not Auburn") politely requested a correction/retraction. SI replied: "Your message was forwarded to the editors". No response as of today. Help me with this, please. I'll continue to DEMAND a PUBLISHED correction. Email to: letters@SI.timeinc.com Rocketman...out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CheeseLover 0 Posted September 24, 2011 Share Posted September 24, 2011 I'm still seething and teeming over the cute and sarcastic innuendo POINT AFTER, "More Perfect Unions", Phil Taylor, Page 88): "...soliciting payment under the table-like Cam Newton's dad did at Auburn...". My email message ("...alledgedly solicited....from MISSISSIPPI STATE, not Auburn") politely requested a correction/retraction. SI replied: "Your message was forwarded to the editors". No response as of today. Help me with this, please. I'll continue to DEMAND a PUBLISHED correction. Email to: letters@SI.timeinc.com Rocketman...out email sent. Let's hope they care (doubtful...) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smilin tiger 0 Posted September 24, 2011 Share Posted September 24, 2011 Sent mine Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CheeseLover 0 Posted September 29, 2011 Share Posted September 29, 2011 Just as an update. I have heard NOTHING from SI. Not even a 'we'll look into this'. Sigh. You'd think they'd at least try to make me feel better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jared52 4,354 Posted September 29, 2011 Share Posted September 29, 2011 Are you still subscribed? Then they don't care.... sorry. If they wanted to print the truth, they would actually have to do a little leg work, but what's the point if they can write what they want and people still give them money for it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AURaptor 1,125 Posted September 29, 2011 Share Posted September 29, 2011 Sent, even though I don't subscribe. I didn't bring that up w/ them in the e-mail, just called them out on them being worthless journalists. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rocketman37 13 Posted September 29, 2011 Author Share Posted September 29, 2011 Are you still subscribed? Then they don't care.... sorry. If they wanted to print the truth, they would actually have to do a little leg work, but what's the point if they can write what they want and people still give them money for it. I subscribed after the BCS NC game (to get the book, football, and DVD). Subscription now cancelled. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CheeseLover 0 Posted September 29, 2011 Share Posted September 29, 2011 Are you still subscribed? Then they don't care.... sorry. If they wanted to print the truth, they would actually have to do a little leg work, but what's the point if they can write what they want and people still give them money for it. Yep, just thought I'd get at least a 'we will look into this' type letter. Me and my damn optimism... I'm not a subscriber so they probably just took my email address and sold it to some junk mail website. Hurray Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rocketman37 13 Posted September 29, 2011 Author Share Posted September 29, 2011 SI replied to my 9/28 (second) email: "Thank you for your interest. We have forwarded your messsage to the Editors" Looks like a "canned" reply, to me. I called the customer service number. The person (India) was very polite; she had no idea what I was requesting. I ain't going away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CheeseLover 0 Posted October 14, 2011 Share Posted October 14, 2011 Started sending daily letters again after the investigation. SI responded. Thank you for your email to Sports Illustrated. This is a topic the editors plan to address in the next (Oct. 24) issue.SI LETTERS Hmmmmm provocative.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikey 16,672 Posted October 15, 2011 Share Posted October 15, 2011 Started sending daily letters again after the investigation. SI responded. Thank you for your email to Sports Illustrated. This is a topic the editors plan to address in the next (Oct. 24) issue.SI LETTERS Hmmmmm provocative.... Please keep us informed as to what they publish. Wouldn't be surprised if they ignore their BS of Sept. 19th and "address the topic" with a story on the NCAA's ruling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CheeseLover 0 Posted October 15, 2011 Share Posted October 15, 2011 Started sending daily letters again after the investigation. SI responded. Thank you for your email to Sports Illustrated. This is a topic the editors plan to address in the next (Oct. 24) issue.SI LETTERS Hmmmmm provocative.... Please keep us informed as to what they publish. Wouldn't be surprised if they ignore their BS of Sept. 19th and "address the topic" with a story on the NCAA's ruling. That's what I think will happen too. If so, I send two emails a day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.