KansasTiger

So we're just going to ignore the fact that the left has been using litigation as a weapon against Trump and many of his staff? Those legal fees are expensive, and the left has been shelling out lawsuits to drain him, his staff and supporters. And it doesn't matter if they're successful or not. Probably the reason behind a few flips. Alot of people might flip when facing financial ruin.

Win your home games and half the away games and you're gonna be a top 4 seed. That took me forever to get used to when I first got into the sport.

Us going on the road always makes me nervous. This isn't a bad time to catch the hogs if we have to play them at Bud Walton. I'm excited to see if the team can start taking the next step.

I forgot about that Duke win. Thanks.

What happened to Arkansas? I looked them up in the NET to see if they'd be a quad 1 game, and they're 86th? Wasn't Musselman supposed to have them good this year? I say this, and somehow he'll get them to the Sweet 16 AGAIN...

I remember now, we've had this discussion before. Because the left didn't let compromise be the end of it. Because of the left's constant pulling, compromise led to the center stability moving one direction, left with each compromise. It was a short term solution that was going to reach a breaking point eventually. My beliefs on many subjects have not changed since 2009, but in that time, I went from right of center moderate to extremist right in less than 15 years. So alot of people see that and say, we should probably stop compromising. We don't have much more room to keep going left anymore and keep living in a country we recognize. This response isn't even getting into my belief that there is little difference in parties when it comes to key issues on capitol hill. When they want something, like say, MORE funding for Ukraine, or MORE support for Israel, or passing the next NDAA that renews three letter agencies' ability to spy on American citizens, or a giant Omnibus spending bill that no one knows whats in it, they always put aside their made up differences and pass it. And in my eyes, those massive bills should be the ones we're arguing about, they're often HIGHLY controversial, but somehow, they often get the least amount of buzz. I want someone in office that will put up a stop sign when those things come to the floor.

Knowing us, we'll approach it again sometime in the near future. I got upset by where you took this because I approach the conversation differently with you than I might with others on here. It's a compliment. But I wasn't a fan of quick you spun up. It happens to the best of us (me included), so we'll try again some other time.

Trump probably does alot of things he thinks might get him to viewers and curry support. Most trump supporters I know are more Tucker fans. From what I've seen. And none of them watch Fox News anymore. Just my observation.

Ok, so you're not better than that. Got it. Forcing me to defend myself on a completely different topic I didn't bring up and talked about maybe 8 months to a year ago. One where I don't even remember exactly what I said. I can tell you what I believe now. It's not feasible without bloodshed, which no one wants. If you want to elect someone who comprises, you do it. If I want to elect someone that doesn't, that's also democracy. Refusing to compromise isn't a lack of democracy. I was trying to have a conversation with you. But screw this.

Well you elevated that fast. Put some additional ideas and words in my mouth too, on your way out. You're better than that. But ok.

Someone jabs back at you and you use it as justification for why you act like a juvenile in the first place. Thanks for being the personification of the lying, circular logic minded, immature left.

You're not actually interested in having a discussion are you? Just wanting to troll? I mean, that's OK, I just have to recalibrate how to approach discussing things. Kind of like explaining this stuff to my five year old.

It's really hard to follow your super overgeneralized remarks and analogies. Someone has to make the assessment of what is establishment or not based on each candidate. If you want people like me to support Haley, good luck. That poll that has her +15 over Biden is a pipe dream where they didn't give any conservative any other choices, so of course she looks great cause she's at the finish line against the most hated dem candidate since Carter's second run. But that's pointless to use as an argument, because people who think like I do would never support her. You overestimate our eagerness to have a compromise filled govt, too. I read a headline that stated this house session passed something like 27 bills vs the usual 300-400. That makes me smile. Our government should have been doing less years ago. Most of my friends greeted that as good news as well.

There is no ability to be anti establishment and run for president without selling your soul to get funding or being independently wealthy.

At some point you can take a guy at face value for what he campaigns on or not. It was that, or support the same old song and dance, which most have written off that they will never do again. I have my own reservations about him being truly anti establishment. That have less to do with your overgeneralized attacks. But in the end, I'd still gladly give him a chance over any other candidate.

On the GOP side I'd only consider supporting Vivek or Trump. I dont see the other options you speak of. Edit: and honestly I don't know a single Trump supporter that watches Hannity.

I believe that if trump fell out, the leading GOP candidate would be Vivek, not Haley. Trump supporters wouldn't magically turn establishment as soon as Trump disappeared. I don't think you give enough credit to the Trump supporters hatred of establishment politics. And yes, DeSantis tried to be anti establishment, but no one bought it.

I'll believe and post them if that gives you a better target. I made this the other day. Fill this out and give me an idea where y'all stand for a good jumping off point...

Does mean he's headed back to SECN? He was better on there than he has been at being a DC the last few years...

There's alot of fallacy in this post. Trump is not the weakest candidate. Polling shows he's probably the strongest or second strongest in the GOP field against Biden.

BP is gonna have to use some portal strategy...

Yes but...BP teams tend to hit them at home against lesser teams then they can't figure out why they're shooting 16% on the road...

Broome's 2/2 from deep? Well now we'll NEVER get him to stop shooting it...😂

I just dont understand them outranking teams that beat them. Makes zero sense. Especially when you start looking at the whole picture.

I'm guessing you're using the T-Rank for that projection? Can someone help me understand the computer's love for Alabama? #3 at 8-5? I get they have a few close losses to good teams, but every good team they've played they lost.