Mikey 16,736 Posted January 27, 2015 Share Posted January 27, 2015 Who said "Israel can do no wrong"? Your posts clearly implied that. Ya'll clearly will not entertain any criticism of Israel -much less sanctions. Sanction Israel when Israel does something that deserves sanctions, which they have yet to do. In the meantime, stop playing footsie with Iran, who has failed to meet several deadlines and the POTUS should stop being Putin's yard dog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarTim 3,457 Posted January 27, 2015 Share Posted January 27, 2015 Well stated Mikey Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
homersapien 11,449 Posted January 27, 2015 Share Posted January 27, 2015 Who said "Israel can do no wrong"? Your posts clearly implied that. Ya'll clearly will not entertain any criticism of Israel -much less sanctions. Sanction Israel when Israel does something that deserves sanctions, which they have yet to do. In the meantime, stop playing footsie with Iran, who has failed to meet several deadlines and the POTUS should stop being Putin's yard dog. Well, that's a judgment call regarding sanctions. But I certainly wouldn't say Israel has not done things which were wrong. In fact, some are calling for embargos now. http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/aug/06/israel-arms-embargo-andrew-mitchell-gaza Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
icanthearyou 4,463 Posted January 27, 2015 Share Posted January 27, 2015 Who said "Israel can do no wrong"? Your posts clearly implied that. Ya'll clearly will not entertain any criticism of Israel -much less sanctions. Sanction Israel when Israel does something that deserves sanctions, which they have yet to do. In the meantime, stop playing footsie with Iran, who has failed to meet several deadlines and the POTUS should stop being Putin's yard dog. Are you just making it up as you go? Are you calling for war? NOW? Are you driven by facts or petty partisan bull****? "In Nov. 2014, however, the International Atomic Energy Agency reported that Iran was complying with the terms of the interim November 2013 agreement, meaning that “All of the enrichment related activities at Iran’s declared facilities are under Agency safeguards, and all of the nuclear material, installed cascades, and feed and withdrawal stations at those facilities are subject to Agency containment and surveillance.” Iran can continue to enrich uranium, but only to the level of 5 percent of U-235, far below the below the 90 percent level needed for a weapon. The IAEA also found that Iran has not made “any further advances” at two enrichment facilities and an unfinished heavy water reactor." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
selias 2,398 Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 selias...I disagree big time but it's way to complicated to get into here. Isn't that why we have a political forum? Feel free to expound on why we should intervene Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
homersapien 11,449 Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 selias...I disagree big time but it's way to complicated to get into here. Isn't that why we have a political forum? Feel free to expound on why we should intervene Perhaps he is waiting on a pending publication of his book or paper on the subject? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
selias 2,398 Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 selias...I disagree big time but it's way to complicated to get into here. Isn't that why we have a political forum? Feel free to expound on why we should intervene Perhaps he is waiting on a pending publication of his book or paper on the subject? Perfectly understandable if that's the case, but I doubt it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.