DKW 86 7,419 Posted April 13, 2015 Share Posted April 13, 2015 One other thought, the GOP is 0-4 in beating Clinton and Obama ... She does have the Clinton name, however she's not nearly as charismatic as president Clinton or Obama. Both of whom can deliver a speech and sell sand to a Floridian. That's a good point. Other point to watch is the electorate tiring of the party in power.Only Bush41 won a third term for the party that controlled the WH the last two terms. So, in aggregate, not that it matters much on this date: Reps holding Sen & HOR would seem to point toward a Dem in the WH. Last two elections Dem won WH, so that favors the Reps. Who knows where the economy will be in eighteen months. People argue that PBO and WJC beat less than stellar candidates from the Republican Party. I am telling you that Bush43 was one of the worst ever to run. So that means that since 1988 Conventional Wisdom means that Reps normally name a horrible candidate for WH. Bush41-Taxes Raised Dole-Walking Corpse Bush43-OMG. McCain-Walking Corpse Romney- Obama Lite Just for laughs: Clinton's press office left an embarrassing typo in its press announcement, saying that she had 'fought children and families all her career' Read more: http://www.dailymail...l#ixzz3X9SAf3Gg Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUFAN78 3,894 Posted April 13, 2015 Share Posted April 13, 2015 One other thought, the GOP is 0-4 in beating Clinton and Obama ... We'll see how much that "helps" Hillary. I suspect there's nothing that can help her change the fact that she is an arrogant elitist bitch with serious attitude of entitlement. How is she going to connect with ordinary people? By her own admission, she hasn't even driven a car in 18 years because the secret service provides her with chariot service 24/7. Regardless of those facts, her "what difference does it make" attitude, recent email issues, etc., I still think HRC wins. Why? I simply don't think those issues connect with the average citizen. And that average citizen will vote! I do not think a Republican candidate can get out enough votes to surpass her. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBlueVue 177 Posted April 13, 2015 Share Posted April 13, 2015 One other thought, the GOP is 0-4 in beating Clinton and Obama ... We'll see how much that "helps" Hillary. I suspect there's nothing that can help her change the fact that she is an arrogant elitist bitch with serious attitude of entitlement. How is she going to connect with ordinary people? By her own admission, she hasn't even driven a car in 18 years because the secret service provides her with chariot service 24/7. Regardless of those facts, her "what difference does it make" attitude, recent email issues, etc., I still think HRC wins. Why? I simply don't think those issues connect with the average citizen. And that average citizen will vote! I do not think a Republican candidate can get out enough votes to surpass her. Obviously, you could be right. I dont think she'll win but that opinion may be a function of what a projectile puke I think she is. Arguably, the only thing worse than having to listen to BHO make incessant references to "I" and "me" is having to listen to Hillary bellow "I am woman hear me bore" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DKW 86 7,419 Posted April 13, 2015 Share Posted April 13, 2015 Today, I've seen Mrs. Clinton referred to as a "whore" more times than I care to count. And for anyone wondering, those posts weren't from Republicans, but from alleged "progressives." "Whore." It disgusts me, not because I have any particular affinity for her campaign, but because it shows with a heart-breaking degree of clarity that we are in for a long period of filthy misogyny as the 2016 presidential campaign unfolds. We've had eight years of right-wingers itching, aching to scream "N****r" at President Obama, and we appear to be starting a cycle of some "progressives" yearning to scream misogynistic invective at Mrs. Clinton. I may have to spend the next year-and-a-half to ten years broadcasting from a vat of bleach water. https://www.facebook.../BobKincaidHORN Maybe this is the election no one will win... And then, there is this: Clinton's press office left an embarrassing typo in its press announcement, saying that she had 'fought children and families all her career' Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3035748/Everyday-Americans-need-champion-Wealthy-Hillary-Clinton-enters-race-president.html#ixzz3X9SAf3Gg Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cooltigger21 0 Posted April 13, 2015 Author Share Posted April 13, 2015 One other thought, the GOP is 0-4 in beating Clinton and Obama ... We'll see how much that "helps" Hillary. I suspect there's nothing that can help her change the fact that she is an arrogant elitist bitch with serious attitude of entitlement. How is she going to connect with ordinary people? By her own admission, she hasn't even driven a car in 18 years because the secret service provides her with chariot service 24/7. Regardless of those facts, her "what difference does it make" attitude, recent email issues, etc., I still think HRC wins. Why? I simply don't think those issues connect with the average citizen. And that average citizen will vote! I do not think a Republican candidate can get out enough votes to surpass her. I think you are wrong. This is possibly the worst candidate the democrats will have put forward in a long time. The republicans can wipe the floor with her if they will stop nominating these establishment types. If they put forward a conservative that can clearly and passionately articulate the conservative principles, that candidate will win the general regardless of who the democrats put up. She has no accomplishments to run on other than just being in a place and travelling all over the country. She is Bills wife but his popularity does not rub off on her. She's already losing ground in key states and in truth the average voter isn't even really paying attention yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
autigeremt 6,600 Posted April 13, 2015 Share Posted April 13, 2015 If Hillary wins the Democratic nomination (which is highly likely) it says as much about that party as it would for the right to send Ben Carson to the General. Clinton is ONLY relevant because she's a woman with a name. Nothing else..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cooltigger21 0 Posted April 13, 2015 Author Share Posted April 13, 2015 The one thing the republican candidate needs to do is remind everyone of the fact that she was in charge of trashing all the women that Bill was cheating on her with. The millennial generation doesn't know that about her. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
icanthearyou 4,462 Posted April 13, 2015 Share Posted April 13, 2015 The one thing the republican candidate needs to do is remind everyone of the fact that she was in charge of trashing all the women that Bill was cheating on her with. The millennial generation doesn't know that about her. Yea. The conservatives should focuss on demonizin Hitlary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarTim 3,456 Posted April 13, 2015 Share Posted April 13, 2015 The one thing the republican candidate needs to do is remind everyone of the fact that she was in charge of trashing all the women that Bill was cheating on her with. The millennial generation doesn't know that about her. Yea. The conservatives should focuss on demonizin Hitlary. No need. The pantsuit can't stop putting her own stinking foot in her mouth... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cooltigger21 0 Posted April 13, 2015 Author Share Posted April 13, 2015 The vote for Hillary because she is a woman and all criticism of her is sexist is falling in deaf ears. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
icanthearyou 4,462 Posted April 13, 2015 Share Posted April 13, 2015 The one thing the republican candidate needs to do is remind everyone of the fact that she was in charge of trashing all the women that Bill was cheating on her with. The millennial generation doesn't know that about her. Yea. The conservatives should focuss on demonizin Hitlary. No need. The pantsuit can't stop putting her own stinking foot in her mouth... Then why do it? Why do you attack her with rhetoric rather than substance? At some point, shouldn't Republicans and conservatives further their own policies and ideas? Or, are you simply going to replace libtards are dumb, barry sux with, libtards are dumb, hitlary the pantsuit sux. Is there a reason to vote for a Republican or conservative or, just reasons to vote against Democrats, liberals, and progressives? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarTim 3,456 Posted April 13, 2015 Share Posted April 13, 2015 Name THREE Positive accomplishments that the pantsuit can claim in service as Senator or SOS......Waiting...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Auburn4life 24 Posted April 13, 2015 Share Posted April 13, 2015 crickets.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DKW 86 7,419 Posted April 13, 2015 Share Posted April 13, 2015 Is there a reason to vote for a Republican or conservative or, just reasons to vote against Democrats, liberals, and progressives? ichy, are we actually voting FOR someone or something or are we just voting AGAINST someone else? Since 1984, i really honestly think i would have to say i was voting AGAINST someone more often than FOR someone. 1988-Paul-Libertarian: Wanted Kemp or Gore (believe it or not.) 1992-Perot-Libertarian: Wanted Kerrey or Paul. 1996-Dole-Republican: Wanted Graham or Keyes. 2000-DID NOT VOTE: Elizabeth Dole, Kasich, Keyes, Bradley. 2004-Bush43: Wanted Clark Leibermann, Anyone but Bush43. I Hated Kerry. 2008-Aubie the Tiger: Wanted Thompson, Thompson, Keyes or Paul. Didnt think McCain was a good candidate at all. 2012-Aubie the Tiger: Wanted Paul, Gingrich, Cain.Knew Romney was going to lose the base badly. Romneycare and runs against Obamacare? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cooltigger21 0 Posted April 13, 2015 Author Share Posted April 13, 2015 I think there are good candidates this time. All declared candidates on the republican side offer me something to vote for. If Walker and Carson get in I think the same about them. None are perfect but I like how they present a positive view of America as a nation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AURaptor 1,122 Posted April 13, 2015 Share Posted April 13, 2015 Hillary can't even face the public to announce her run. She has to hide behind a scripted, choreographed and completely controlled video. She's an empty pantsuit with exactly zero accomplishments beyond marrying Bill & riding his coat tails. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MDM4AU 332 Posted April 14, 2015 Share Posted April 14, 2015 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
icanthearyou 4,462 Posted April 14, 2015 Share Posted April 14, 2015 I just hope the caption doesn't turn into, "If you think you really have a choice,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,think again". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MDM4AU 332 Posted April 14, 2015 Share Posted April 14, 2015 I just hope the caption doesn't turn into, "If you think you really have a choice,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,think again". I honestly pray that is not the case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
homersapien 11,367 Posted April 15, 2015 Share Posted April 15, 2015 Hillary can't even face the public to announce her run. She has to hide behind a scripted, choreographed and completely controlled video. She's an empty pantsuit with exactly zero accomplishments beyond marrying Bill & riding his coat tails. Man, you've really got a thing about pantsuits, dotcha ya? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AURaptor 1,122 Posted April 15, 2015 Share Posted April 15, 2015 Hillary can't even face the public to announce her run. She has to hide behind a scripted, choreographed and completely controlled video. She's an empty pantsuit with exactly zero accomplishments beyond marrying Bill & riding his coat tails. Man, you've really got a thing about pantsuits, dotcha ya? What difference, at this point, does it make ? Naw, actually, she does. Which is why it's funny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RunInRed 16,404 Posted April 15, 2015 Share Posted April 15, 2015 Name THREE Positive accomplishments that the pantsuit can claim in service as Senator or SOS......Waiting...... She played a leading role in the development of State Children’s Health Insurance Program She was instrumental in the creation of the Adoption and Safe Families Act and the Foster Care Independence Act She successfully fought to increase research funding for prostate cancer and asthma at the National Institute of Health (NIH) At the Department of Justice, she helped create the office on Violence Against Women She was instrumental in securing over $21 billion in funding for the World Trade Center redevelopment She a leading role in the investigation of health consequences of first responders and drafted the first bill to compensate and offer the health services our first responders deserve (Clinton’s successor in the Senate, Kirsten Gillibrand, passed the bill) She was instrumental in working out a bi-partisan compromise to address civil liberty abuses for the renewal of the U.S. Patriot Act She brokered human rights with Burma She oversaw free trade agreements with our allies Panama, Colombia, and South Korea Again, I'm not necessarily a Hillary supporter (yet) but to say she hasn't accomplished anything is quite ignorant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
autigeremt 6,600 Posted April 15, 2015 Share Posted April 15, 2015 She assisted in the deaths of four Americans, including one of her own in the State Dept. winner, winner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RunInRed 16,404 Posted April 15, 2015 Share Posted April 15, 2015 She assisted in the deaths of four Americans, including one of her own in the State Dept. winner, winner. That's worse than the equivalent of blaming 4,000+ American causalities in Iraq on GWB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
autigeremt 6,600 Posted April 15, 2015 Share Posted April 15, 2015 She assisted in the deaths of four Americans, including one of her own in the State Dept. winner, winner. That's worse than the equivalent of blaming 4,000+ American causalities in Iraq on GWB. Not really......Bush was a fool as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.