TexasTiger 12,876 Posted April 15, 2021 Share Posted April 15, 2021 Folks will still whine about the hoax of the “Russian Hoax,” but the key question is how this information didn’t previously see the light of day? https://www.justsecurity.org/75766/us-treasury-provides-missing-link-manaforts-partner-gave-campaign-polling-data-to-kremlin-in-2016/ 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jj3jordan 2,053 Posted April 15, 2021 Share Posted April 15, 2021 Still couldn’t tell what he did with the info. Was this Trump internal polling that showed him ahead? Or other public polling that showed him losing badly? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TexasTiger 12,876 Posted April 15, 2021 Author Share Posted April 15, 2021 2 hours ago, jj3jordan said: Still couldn’t tell what he did with the info. Was this Trump internal polling that showed him ahead? Or other public polling that showed him losing badly? I suspect it’s polling on what to exploit. But why share any polling with Russian intelligence? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jj3jordan 2,053 Posted April 16, 2021 Share Posted April 16, 2021 (edited) 2 hours ago, TexasTiger said: I suspect it’s polling on what to exploit. But why share any polling with Russian intelligence? You think this information steered the Russians into what particular Facebook ads to purchase? Edited April 16, 2021 by jj3jordan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TexasTiger 12,876 Posted April 16, 2021 Author Share Posted April 16, 2021 53 minutes ago, jj3jordan said: You think this information steered the Russians into what particular Facebook ads to purchase? Wouldn’t shock me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jj3jordan 2,053 Posted April 16, 2021 Share Posted April 16, 2021 22 minutes ago, TexasTiger said: Wouldn’t shock me. 22 minutes ago, TexasTiger said: Wouldn’t shock me. It would shock me if anyone out there is dumb enough to make a voting decision from Facebook information. 1 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TexasTiger 12,876 Posted April 16, 2021 Author Share Posted April 16, 2021 13 hours ago, jj3jordan said: It would shock me if anyone out there is dumb enough to make a voting decision from Facebook information. Got news for you. Folks believe a lot of crazy stuff they see on social media, such as DT won the election. Beyond that, however, is this establishes the link Trump denied and Mueller was denied access to. Cover up? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigbird 60,529 Posted April 16, 2021 Share Posted April 16, 2021 I thought everyone is supposed to accept the election results? 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TexasTiger 12,876 Posted April 16, 2021 Author Share Posted April 16, 2021 This is not the smack forum. This thread is about new information not previously disclosed. It’s not apparent anyone responding even read the article. If you don’t want to reasonably discuss this topic, there are numerous smack threads on which you can regurgitate the same old tired partisan lines. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaltyTiger 7,808 Posted April 16, 2021 Share Posted April 16, 2021 51 minutes ago, TexasTiger said: This is not the smack forum. This thread is about new information not previously disclosed. It’s not apparent anyone responding even read the article. If you don’t want to reasonably discuss this topic, there are numerous smack threads on which you can regurgitate the same old tired partisan lines. Read the article twice and curious as to how TD can make a definitive while the others danced all around it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TexasTiger 12,876 Posted April 16, 2021 Author Share Posted April 16, 2021 1 hour ago, SaltyTiger said: Read the article twice and curious as to how TD can make a definitive while the others danced all around it. I don’t think others dance around it as much as everything pointed in that direction but they weren’t provided confirmation from intelligence. The assumption was that Mueller was conducting two investigations— one a counterintelligence investigation that was still ongoing even after his report. Later turned out Rosenstein quashed that. The choices appear to be that the intelligence was there, but not provided before or the current TD is just making it up. Why would the Russian operative not share the info with Russian intelligence? How likely is that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaltyTiger 7,808 Posted April 16, 2021 Share Posted April 16, 2021 1 hour ago, TexasTiger said: I don’t think others dance around it as much as everything pointed in that direction but they weren’t provided confirmation from intelligence. The assumption was that Mueller was conducting two investigations— one a counterintelligence investigation that was still ongoing even after his report. Later turned out Rosenstein quashed that. The choices appear to be that the intelligence was there, but not provided before or the current TD is just making it up. Why would the Russian operative not share the info with Russian intelligence? How likely is that? Stand to reason that he may share info but hard to imagine it being anything of real value. 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TexasTiger 12,876 Posted April 16, 2021 Author Share Posted April 16, 2021 42 minutes ago, SaltyTiger said: Stand to reason that he may share info but hard to imagine it being anything of real value. 10 years ago if you’d been told the nominee of either party was sharing polling data with Russian intelligence would you have been as likely to dismiss it as unimportant? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaltyTiger 7,808 Posted April 16, 2021 Share Posted April 16, 2021 2 hours ago, TexasTiger said: 10 years ago if you’d been told the nominee of either party was sharing polling data with Russian intelligence would you have been as likely to dismiss it as unimportant? I would bet it happened 10 years ago. Just that no one felt it multiple investigation worthy. Further, if you told me we would elect Donald Trump 10 years ago I would have called you a nutcase. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DKW 86 7,424 Posted April 16, 2021 Share Posted April 16, 2021 That $1.3M that compensated for being our spent by $500M.... Must have been the singular most shrewd ad buy in history. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TexasTiger 12,876 Posted April 16, 2021 Author Share Posted April 16, 2021 2 hours ago, SaltyTiger said: I would bet it happened 10 years ago. Just that no one felt it multiple investigation worthy. Further, if you told me we would elect Donald Trump 10 years ago I would have called you a nutcase. So which nominee are you guessing engaged Russian intelligence 10 years ago? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TexasTiger 12,876 Posted April 16, 2021 Author Share Posted April 16, 2021 56 minutes ago, DKW 86 said: That $1.3M that compensated for being our spent by $500M.... Must have been the singular most shrewd ad buy in history. David continues to bend over backwards to defend Trump by glossing over the fact of his working with Russians after previously claiming it didn’t happen. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jj3jordan 2,053 Posted April 16, 2021 Share Posted April 16, 2021 16 hours ago, TexasTiger said: Got news for you. Folks believe a lot of crazy stuff they see on social media, such as DT won the election. Beyond that, however, is this establishes the link Trump denied and Mueller was denied access to. Cover up? Which election that DT won are you referencing? 2016? Did social media crazily proclaim that DT won? Because next to NOBODY on the left/dem establishment believed it true and accepted it as a win. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TexasTiger 12,876 Posted April 16, 2021 Author Share Posted April 16, 2021 2 minutes ago, jj3jordan said: Which election that DT won are you referencing? 2016? Did social media crazily proclaim that DT won? Because next to NOBODY on the left/dem establishment believed it true and accepted it as a win. That’s an absolute crock. HRC conceded right away. Obama recognized it right away and graciously welcomed Trump to the WH. How many Dems voted not to certify the results? There’s no comparison and any one claiming it as such has been brainwashed by some medium. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jj3jordan 2,053 Posted April 16, 2021 Share Posted April 16, 2021 Just now, TexasTiger said: That’s an absolute crock. HRC conceded right away. Obama recognized it right away and graciously welcomed Trump to the WH. How many Dems voted not to certify the results? There’s no comparison and any one claiming it as such has been brainwashed by some medium. Did you miss the Russia Russia Russia collusion investigation? I'm pretty sure there were numerous dems who objected to the certification. Obama was no fan of Hillary. Hillary was forced to concede but it's doubtful she would have without urging. Then she spent the next four years claiming the russians (the ones she hired) helped DT win so it was not legit. Acceptance that is not. That whole thing was designed to get DT out BEFORE inauguration so Hillary could be declared the winner. Didn't happen so they went to impeachment and yada yada yada. If you think ANYTHING done by the dems was acceptance of DT victory you are delusional. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaltyTiger 7,808 Posted April 16, 2021 Share Posted April 16, 2021 33 minutes ago, TexasTiger said: So which nominee are you guessing engaged Russian intelligence 10 years ago? Nominee? The 2016 nominee never engaged Russian intelligence. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TexasTiger 12,876 Posted April 17, 2021 Author Share Posted April 17, 2021 2 hours ago, jj3jordan said: Did you miss the Russia Russia Russia collusion investigation? I'm pretty sure there were numerous dems who objected to the certification. Obama was no fan of Hillary. Hillary was forced to concede but it's doubtful she would have without urging. Then she spent the next four years claiming the russians (the ones she hired) helped DT win so it was not legit. Acceptance that is not. That whole thing was designed to get DT out BEFORE inauguration so Hillary could be declared the winner. Didn't happen so they went to impeachment and yada yada yada. If you think ANYTHING done by the dems was acceptance of DT victory you are delusional. Obama certainly wanted Hillary over Trump. Hillary conceded the next morning so it didn’t take much urging: https://www.google.com/amp/s/time.com/4564480/read-hillary-clintons-concession-speech-full-transcript/%3famp=true Trump hasn’t conceded yet. McConnell waited until the electoral college voted. Obama urged acceptance the next day: But you @SaltyTigerand @bigbird and others keep believing your hyper partisan fantasy. Facts don’t penetrate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TexasTiger 12,876 Posted April 17, 2021 Author Share Posted April 17, 2021 This guy’s as conservative as they come. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jj3jordan 2,053 Posted April 17, 2021 Share Posted April 17, 2021 7 hours ago, TexasTiger said: This guy’s as conservative as they come. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/08/25/joe-walsh-apologizes-racist-comments-run-against-trump/2115011001/ If that is your conservative standard bearer you need to pick another one. Again, for real, how did the Kremlin help Trump win? By saying that Hillary is an arrogant mean unlikeable vengeful drunk leftist? Still no legit sane believable explanation. FB? Sorry that’s just pathetic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TexasTiger 12,876 Posted April 17, 2021 Author Share Posted April 17, 2021 33 minutes ago, jj3jordan said: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/08/25/joe-walsh-apologizes-racist-comments-run-against-trump/2115011001/ If that is your conservative standard bearer you need to pick another one. Again, for real, how did the Kremlin help Trump win? By saying that Hillary is an arrogant mean unlikeable vengeful drunk leftist? Still no legit sane believable explanation. FB? Sorry that’s just pathetic. Can’t stand a guy who apologizes for racist comments? He can’t be a real conservative? Thanks for finally clarifying how you and your buddies have redefined conservatism. So you endorse campaigns working with Russian intelligence. How about China? Iran? Any limits? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now