DKW 86 7,429 Posted July 25, 2005 Share Posted July 25, 2005 From Gridscape! 2000-2004 - UT, Florida, Georgia, Auburn, LSU, and Bama vs. each other. Auburn - 14-8 (.636) Florida - 12-7 (.631) LSU - 12-9 (.571) Georgia - 10-10 (.500) Tennessee - 9-12 (.428 ) Alabama - 3-14 (.176) WTG Tommy!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tigermike 3,039 Posted July 25, 2005 Share Posted July 25, 2005 That is surprising, good job CTT & staff and PLAYERS! WDE Even more surprising is Tennessee - 9-12 (.428 ). I would have thought they would have won more SEC games during that period. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AuNuma1 1 Posted July 25, 2005 Share Posted July 25, 2005 The gridscape people seem to think our numbers are good because we haven't played UF lately. They also say "Thank God for Albamia". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tigermike 3,039 Posted July 25, 2005 Share Posted July 25, 2005 The gridscape people seem to think our numbers are good because we haven't played UF lately. They also say "Thank God for Albamia". 170327[/snapback] I say it's Florida's good fortune they didn't play AUBURN last year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quietfan 233 Posted July 25, 2005 Share Posted July 25, 2005 The gridscape people seem to think our numbers are good because we haven't played UF lately. They also say "Thank God for Albamia". 170327[/snapback] I say it's Florida's good fortune they didn't play AUBURN last year. 170337[/snapback] Well, if the Gators want a piece of us, just tell 'em to meet us in Atlanta on Dec 3rd! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexgreatau 0 Posted July 25, 2005 Share Posted July 25, 2005 Of course, UAT is 3-14 because of Phil Fulmer and probation. UAT is the mecca of college football, remember? UAT brought national respectability to the SEC and now with their demise, the SEC is befeft of that national respect that it once had during the Bear Bryant years. This program would have won four straight national championships by now and the record against teams like UGA, Fla, UT, LSU, and Auburn would have been 17-0 had it not been for the whistleblower Fulmer. Alex Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CarolinaTiger 0 Posted July 25, 2005 Share Posted July 25, 2005 aside from having the highest winning %, we also played the most games in that group as well. BUT, it's really not a fair stat, given that we get to play alabama every year and some schools like UF and UGa don't get to every year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarEagle_57 0 Posted July 25, 2005 Share Posted July 25, 2005 Alabama won 3? Did they beat LSU one year that I can't remember or something? I wonder what those numbers would look like if you replaced Alabama with Arky or even Ole Miss or SC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TigerFreak 6 Posted July 26, 2005 Share Posted July 26, 2005 From Gridscape!2000-2004 - UT, Florida, Georgia, Auburn, LSU, and Bama vs. each other. Auburn - 14-8 (.636) Florida - 12-7 (.631) LSU - 12-9 (.571) Georgia - 10-10 (.500) Tennessee - 9-12 (.428 ) Alabama - 3-14 (.176) WTG Tommy!!!! 170313[/snapback] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarEagle_57 0 Posted July 26, 2005 Share Posted July 26, 2005 Very odd that AU played the top 6 teams the most and had the best %, while uaT played the top 5 the least and had the worst %. You'd think it would be the other way around wouldn't you? Auburn's other SEC losses in those years included once to MSU, once to Ole Miss, and twice to arkansas. I wonder if the other teams all had less losses to the bottom 6 than we did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Draven 0 Posted July 26, 2005 Share Posted July 26, 2005 Way to go CTT and staff Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.