Islamo-Fascisim: Taqiyya and Tu-Quoque

[DKW 86 7,451]

http://jihadwatch.org/archives/004628.php

I. Taqiyya and Tu-Quoque ....

It has been quite an effort to prevent Infidels from getting the wrong (that is to say, the right) impression of Islam, at least until such time as Muslims in the West currently singing the praises of “pluralism” no longer have need for Infidel good will and tolerance. To date, the twin techniques of “Taqiyya” and Tu-Quoque have been relied on. “Taqiyya” is the religiously-sanctioned doctrine, with its origins in Shi’a Islam but now practiced by non-Shi’a as well, of deliberate dissimulation about religious matters that may be undertaken to protect Islam, and the Believers. (In short, outright lying about your muslim believes is perfectly acceptable.) A related term, of broader application, is “kitman,” which is defined as “mental reservation.” An example of “Taqiyya” would be the insistence of a Muslim apologist that “of course” there is freedom of conscience in Islam, and then quoting that Qur’anic verse -- “There shall be no compulsion in religion.” But the impression given will be false, for there has been no mention of the Muslim doctrine of abrogation, or naskh, whereby such an early verse as that about “no compulsion in religion” has been cancelled out by later, far more intolerant and malevolent verses. In any case, history shows that within Islam there is, and always has been, “compulsion in religion” for Muslims, and for non-Muslims. The “compulsion” for Muslims comes from the treatment of apostasy as an act punishable by death. And though “dhimmis” are allowed to practice their religion, they do so under conditions of such burdens and restrictions that many, not as an act of conscience but rather as a response to inexorable Muslim pressure, have converted (or “reverted”) to Islam.

http://peace.heebz.com/dhimma.html

2. dhimmis- non Muslims living under a caliphate.

"The vile and ignorant dhimmis (non-Muslims in an Islamic country) must be humiliated, belittled and rendered abominable and able to be distinguished by their appearance." For example, "different colored shoes, one white the other black"; for males badges such as an "ape for a Jew and a pig for a Christian: for women yellow veils." The distinctive dress shows the Muslim that the dhimmi is to be treated as an inferior - not to stand up for her or shake his hand, not to give them Muslim charity. He is to expect respect and deference from the dhimmi who shall not join a group of Muslims or raise his voice in their presence. The non-Muslim is to stand aside if the pathway is narrow. It is haram (unlawful) for him to slaughter animals; reserved for him is the cleaning of lavatories and sewers, and carrying away rubbish and refuse. His house should be painted a dull color and be no larger than that of a Muslim neighbor.

Do you folks not know about how Jews and others were forced out of their homes and businesses by legal decree. The Nazis made it illegal to inter-marry with Jews, etc. They considered the Slavs to literally be a mongoloiod race and treated them as such. Do you not remember the pink triangles, the stars of David, etc that the Nazis forced the Jews and others to wear? The monkey is a slap at the Jews. The Muslims say that Judaism is a guttural religion. In other words, lower down the evolutionary path. That is why they are compared to Monkeys. We are compared to pigs because we are unclean before them.

Just remember this folks. The Muslims think it is fine and justifiable to lie about their believes and also about the goals of Islam.