AUBwins 10,088 Posted January 7, 2015 Share Posted January 7, 2015 Wasn't there a mention of someone that coaches for Green Bay. I that is the case, then it makes sense we have not hired Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KcPg14 24 Posted January 7, 2015 Share Posted January 7, 2015 Technically, we don't need another coach if Muschamp coached linebackers. But if there was another hire, that would help out a lot with recruiting. Heck, I think Bama has about 5 assistants plus Smart and Saban coaching defense. The more coaches, the merrier. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
auburn2oregon 0 Posted January 7, 2015 Share Posted January 7, 2015 I'm curious as to the holdup on last hire ... Any crazy crazy chance that an Oregon or osu coach is possible? They don't have to hire another coach. One more would put Auburn at the maximum number of on field coaches but they have every position on defense covered right now if WM wants to coach linebackers. While you are absolutely correct, it would be beyond STUPID to not hire another on field coach. Especially since the dead period is coming to an end. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShocksMyBrain 9,375 Posted January 7, 2015 Share Posted January 7, 2015 What reason would there be to not have a full coaching staff? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tsande07 271 Posted January 7, 2015 Share Posted January 7, 2015 Though I doubt we could get a coach from Oregon or Ohio State, it would be so awesome if coach Malzahn could pull off a huge surprise by horing a LB coach from one of those teams. I'm pretty sure Malzahn wouldnt stoop to the level of prostitution just to get a LB coach from Oregon or Ohio ST. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AU80cruiser 1,102 Posted January 7, 2015 Share Posted January 7, 2015 Though I doubt we could get a coach from Oregon or Ohio State, it would be so awesome if coach Malzahn could pull off a huge surprise by horing a LB coach from one of those teams. I'm pretty sure Malzahn wouldnt stoop to the level of prostitution just to get a LB coach from Oregon or Ohio ST. :rimshot:/> Thanks I can't add the emoticon with my phone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metafour 4,969 Posted January 7, 2015 Share Posted January 7, 2015 What reason would there be to not have a full coaching staff? None. I literally shook my head reading that comment LOL. Obviously they will hire another coach, because there is zero reason not to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cooltigger21 0 Posted January 7, 2015 Share Posted January 7, 2015 What reason would there be to not have a full coaching staff? None. I literally shook my head reading that comment LOL. Obviously they will hire another coach, because there is zero reason not to. I never said they should not. I only said they don't have to. Just pointing out different scenarios that COULD happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metafour 4,969 Posted January 8, 2015 Share Posted January 8, 2015 I never said they should not. I only said they don't have to. Just pointing out different scenarios that COULD happen. They DO have to hire another coach. Do you know why? Because we are in the business of competing. We didn't just fire three coaches and give Muschamp $1.6-1.8 million per year so that we could half-ass our way to running a football program. The fact that you actually posted that is beyond belief. Yes, they do need to hire another coach because Auburn football is a business that is trying to succeed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
auburn4ever 1,266 Posted January 8, 2015 Share Posted January 8, 2015 Why would Auburn not want a full coaching staff? that's like Florida only playing 11 games while everyone else played 12 this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cooltigger21 0 Posted January 8, 2015 Share Posted January 8, 2015 I never said they should not. I only said they don't have to. Just pointing out different scenarios that COULD happen. They DO have to hire another coach. Do you know why? Because we are in the business of competing. We didn't just fire three coaches and give Muschamp $1.6-1.8 million per year so that we could half-ass our way to running a football program. The fact that you actually posted that is beyond belief. Yes, they do need to hire another coach because Auburn football is a business that is trying to succeed. Well excuse the hell out of me then. Next time I'll consult your highness before daring to post something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
auburn4ever 1,266 Posted January 8, 2015 Share Posted January 8, 2015 Maybe coach Muschamp should talk to these guys. Two more Ragin’ Cajun football assistant coaches have left UL, making it four since the start of the 2014 season and meaning none of head coach Mark Hudspeth’s original defensive staff members remain with the program. UL confirmed Sunday that both defensive line coach Tim Edwards and interim outside linebackers coach Matt Wallerstedt “will not be returning” in 2015. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AuburnArch13 185 Posted January 8, 2015 Share Posted January 8, 2015 Durkin had a tough choice to make. Come to AU under will muschamp as a position coach or go be a dcoordinator at Michigan under another former boss in harbaugh. How is that a tough choice? He's obviously going to take the DC job, hence why any idea of him coming here as a LB coach was absurd. He was never coming here. Now your contradiction yourself, when I brought up the possibility of him coming here, you come out and say that it was nothing new and that the conversation had been going on before will was hired. Now u say it's absurd because he was never coming, lol. Durkin as a possibility was nothing new. It had been speculated since Muschamp was hired. However that possibility was contingent upon him not receiving a major DC offer. Once Michigan offered DC, we no longer had the best offer on the table, and there was no difficult choice to be made. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tbone4jc 2,241 Posted January 8, 2015 Share Posted January 8, 2015 Some of y'all acting like morons. Go eat a snickers bar and stop being so critical of people who may or may not have info that will eventually come to pass, or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
war eagle6 0 Posted January 8, 2015 Share Posted January 8, 2015 Durkin had a tough choice to make. Come to AU under will muschamp as a position coach or go be a dcoordinator at Michigan under another former boss in harbaugh. How is that a tough choice? He's obviously going to take the DC job, hence why any idea of him coming here as a LB coach was absurd. He was never coming here. Now your contradiction yourself, when I brought up the possibility of him coming here, you come out and say that it was nothing new and that the conversation had been going on before will was hired. Now u say it's absurd because he was never coming, lol. Durkin as a possibility was nothing new. It had been speculated since Muschamp was hired. However that possibility was contingent upon him not receiving a major DC offer. Once Michigan offered DC, we no longer had the best offer on the table, and there was no difficult choice to be made. exactly^^. The only reason I said tough choice is because of his loyalty to will and harbaugh. WDE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PigskinPat 2,579 Posted January 8, 2015 Share Posted January 8, 2015 Durkin had a tough choice to make. Come to AU under will muschamp as a position coach or go be a dcoordinator at Michigan under another former boss in harbaugh. How is that a tough choice? He's obviously going to take the DC job, hence why any idea of him coming here as a LB coach was absurd. He was never coming here. Now your contradiction yourself, when I brought up the possibility of him coming here, you come out and say that it was nothing new and that the conversation had been going on before will was hired. Now u say it's absurd because he was never coming, lol. Durkin as a possibility was nothing new. It had been speculated since Muschamp was hired. However that possibility was contingent upon him not receiving a major DC offer. Once Michigan offered DC, we no longer had the best offer on the table, and there was no difficult choice to be made. exactly^^. The only reason I said tough choice is because of his loyalty to will and harbaugh. WDE 6, you said on several occasions that these hires would be epic and basically shake the college football world to its core. Who are these hires you were referring to?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gravejd 3,271 Posted January 8, 2015 Share Posted January 8, 2015 The fact that it's taking this long could mean some pro guys are in play. Which wouldn't be a bad thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blueridge 29 Posted January 8, 2015 Share Posted January 8, 2015 this thread is starting to look like the muschamp thread on that friday afternoon in early december. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doc4aday 1,887 Posted January 8, 2015 Share Posted January 8, 2015 Is Rudy Ford kin to Dee Ford? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cammycam2 173 Posted January 8, 2015 Share Posted January 8, 2015 Cam newton to coach LBs. You heard it first here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShocksMyBrain 9,375 Posted January 8, 2015 Share Posted January 8, 2015 Cam newton to coach LBs. You heard it first here Sounds legit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doc4aday 1,887 Posted January 8, 2015 Share Posted January 8, 2015 I think we need to get "Tickle" from the Destination America show called "Moonshiners." If this does not work out, we can go out and find "The Mother of all defensive coaches in America." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dom1ni0n 51 Posted January 8, 2015 Share Posted January 8, 2015 Is Rudy Ford kin to Dee Ford? Both brothers with Cole Ford... ...A 'Four Brothers', brotherhood. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chimesAU 89 Posted January 8, 2015 Share Posted January 8, 2015 Durkin had a tough choice to make. Come to AU under will muschamp as a position coach or go be a dcoordinator at Michigan under another former boss in harbaugh. How is that a tough choice? He's obviously going to take the DC job, hence why any idea of him coming here as a LB coach was absurd. He was never coming here. Now your contradiction yourself, when I brought up the possibility of him coming here, you come out and say that it was nothing new and that the conversation had been going on before will was hired. Now u say it's absurd because he was never coming, lol. Durkin as a possibility was nothing new. It had been speculated since Muschamp was hired. However that possibility was contingent upon him not receiving a major DC offer. Once Michigan offered DC, we no longer had the best offer on the table, and there was no difficult choice to be made. exactly^^. The only reason I said tough choice is because of his loyalty to will and harbaugh. WDE 6, you said on several occasions that these hires would be epic and basically shake the college football world to its core. Who are these hires you were referring to?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDUBB4AU 5,123 Posted January 8, 2015 Share Posted January 8, 2015 Hire John Lithgow off Varsity Blues . He was a hard nose guy. Won a lot of district titles Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.