AUFAN78 3,943 Posted February 18, 2018 Share Posted February 18, 2018 26 minutes ago, homersapien said: Well, let me put it this way. What they say is literal and obvious. They both claim what is true about this indictment. (I bolded the key qualifier for you.) You seem to think they represent the final conclusion of Mueller's investigation. They don't. (See my post addressing the same point in the Bertwitz piece you referenced.) Lost me there bro. Not sure what you are trying to say? In no way do I think the Mueller investigation is complete. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaltyTiger 7,908 Posted February 18, 2018 Share Posted February 18, 2018 6 minutes ago, homersapien said: Well not exactly. But I can make a good case to any rational person with a pretty good knowledge of physical science. I know you can Brother Homer, you do well at most things and I try to study your posts......appears all of this Trump/Russia mess is not working out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AU64 10,122 Posted February 18, 2018 Share Posted February 18, 2018 So...foreign nationals paid for trying to influence our elections....wonder when that guy Steele will be indicted for the same "crime".? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUFAN78 3,943 Posted February 18, 2018 Share Posted February 18, 2018 8 minutes ago, AU64 said: So...foreign nationals paid for trying to influence our elections....wonder when that guy Steele will be indicted for the same "crime".? Not to mention those that funded him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
homersapien 11,513 Posted February 18, 2018 Share Posted February 18, 2018 37 minutes ago, AUFAN78 said: Lost me there bro. Not sure what you are trying to say? Let's start over. What was your point in posting these two lines? "There is no allegation in this indictment that any American had any knowledge." "[There is] no allegation in the indictment of any effect on the outcome of the election." –Rod Rosenstein Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUFAN78 3,943 Posted February 18, 2018 Share Posted February 18, 2018 13 minutes ago, homersapien said: Let's start over. What was your point in posting these two lines? "There is no allegation in this indictment that any American had any knowledge." "[There is] no allegation in the indictment of any effect on the outcome of the election." –Rod Rosenstein You said, "Meanwhile, Trump can't seem to accept the fact Russians actually did what they did." Trump has touted Russian interference did not affect the election outcome. Trump has touted no collusion. Deputy A.G Rod Rosenstein's embolden comments appear to agree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
channonc 466 Posted March 29, 2018 Share Posted March 29, 2018 This latest filing is quite interesting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Proud Tiger 4,261 Posted March 29, 2018 Share Posted March 29, 2018 52 minutes ago, channonc said: This latest filing is quite interesting. If he is guilty punish him. But i see Ms. Weiner is still accompanying Hillary around and she had classified info on her computer. Do you agree she should be punished too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaltyTiger 7,908 Posted March 29, 2018 Share Posted March 29, 2018 5 minutes ago, Proud Tiger said: If he is guilty punish him. But i see Ms. Weiner is still accompanying Hillary around and she had classified info on her computer. Do you agree she should be punished too. This entire thing reads like a family tree that you need a flow chart to follow: Mueller: Rick Gates spoke to person with Russian spy ties in late 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.