TexasTiger 13,000 Posted April 27, 2023 Share Posted April 27, 2023 This is the kind of crazy folks we have in Texas leadership: “Employees are expected to comply with this dress code in a manner consistent with their biological gender,” reads the memo, posted in full on the Observer's website. “Violation of this agency policy includes remedies up to and including termination.” https://www.sacurrent.com/news/sid-millers-texas-department-of-agriculture-adopts-new-anti-lgbtq-dress-code-31570168?utm_source=nextdoor&utm_medium=RSS&utm_campaign=Nextdoor What the hell does that even mean? There’s no one way for women or men to dress. We were more progressive in the 1970s in regard to these issues. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I_M4_AU 7,957 Posted April 27, 2023 Share Posted April 27, 2023 Is this an appointed office or is he voted on? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wdefromtx 3,159 Posted April 27, 2023 Share Posted April 27, 2023 9 minutes ago, I_M4_AU said: Is this an appointed office or is he voted on? Elected. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaltyTiger 7,853 Posted April 28, 2023 Share Posted April 28, 2023 5 hours ago, TexasTiger said: This is the kind of crazy folks we have in Texas leadership: Men “no pants tucked in boots”. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TexasTiger 13,000 Posted April 28, 2023 Author Share Posted April 28, 2023 11 hours ago, SaltyTiger said: Men “no pants tucked in boots”. It’s Texas. Men have flasks in boots. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoffeeTiger 5,165 Posted April 28, 2023 Share Posted April 28, 2023 Quote The document is signed by TDA Commissioner Sid Miller, a conservative Republican with a history of making offensive social media comments targeting women and people of color. Those have included urging the U.S. to bomb the "Muslim World" and calling Hillary Clinton a "****." Classy Guy. Unless The Texas Department of Ag has men coming to work in dresses and skirts I imagine this rule is just a solution in search of a problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I_M4_AU 7,957 Posted April 28, 2023 Share Posted April 28, 2023 1 hour ago, CoffeeTiger said: Classy Guy. Unless The Texas Department of Ag has men coming to work in dresses and skirts I imagine this rule is just a solution in search of a problem. Or just a political statement considering the current mind set. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
homersapien 11,428 Posted April 28, 2023 Share Posted April 28, 2023 18 hours ago, TexasTiger said: This is the kind of crazy folks we have in Texas leadership: “Employees are expected to comply with this dress code in a manner consistent with their biological gender,” reads the memo, posted in full on the Observer's website. “Violation of this agency policy includes remedies up to and including termination.” https://www.sacurrent.com/news/sid-millers-texas-department-of-agriculture-adopts-new-anti-lgbtq-dress-code-31570168?utm_source=nextdoor&utm_medium=RSS&utm_campaign=Nextdoor What the hell does that even mean? There’s no one way for women or men to dress. We were more progressive in the 1970s in regard to these issues. It's obviously meant as a way to persecute transexuals or "butch" lesbians. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaltyTiger 7,853 Posted April 28, 2023 Share Posted April 28, 2023 2 hours ago, TexasTiger said: It’s Texas. Men have flasks in boots. I always heard Texan pants in boots meant you had money. I always wore Georgia Boots when on job site. Put mine in boots to avoid mud and concrete. Couldn’t have worked for Texas Ag. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AU9377 5,025 Posted April 28, 2023 Share Posted April 28, 2023 1 hour ago, I_M4_AU said: Or just a political statement considering the current mind set. If so, that is a total failure in leadership. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TexasTiger 13,000 Posted April 28, 2023 Author Share Posted April 28, 2023 Interesting perspective on this issue: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
icanthearyou 4,463 Posted April 29, 2023 Share Posted April 29, 2023 On 4/28/2023 at 10:25 AM, homersapien said: It's obviously meant as a way to persecute transexuals or "butch" lesbians. There can be no appearances of validating or accepting the idea that these queers and trannies are equal human beings. Anything else is "woke". 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now